Quim Gil wrote:
ext Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente wrote:
I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published,
with
few points (to make it practical).
Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next
meetings, i.e.
And a second cha
ext Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente wrote:
>> I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published, with
>> few points (to make it practical).
>>
>> Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next
>> meetings, i.e.
>
> And a second c
Hi,
Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente wrote:
> I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published, with
> few points (to make it practical).
>
> Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next
> meetings, i.e.
And a second channel for anyone to talk to, with the
Hello,
I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published, with
few points (to make it practical).
Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next
meetings, i.e.
2008/5/16 Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, the chat was fun but there were some impracticalities
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, the chat was fun but there were some impracticalities. Fine for the
> first time but, as you say, better alternatives should be tried in next
> occasions.
>
> For instance, what about choosing one topic (or two) and go throu
Hi, the chat was fun but there were some impracticalities. Fine for the
first time but, as you say, better alternatives should be tried in next
occasions.
For instance, what about choosing one topic (or two) and go through it?
Of course having questions in advance helps but it is also obvious that
