Just a heads up. The list will be finalized tomorrow and make its way
to the packaging policy (hopefully) by the end of the week. Any
changes after tomorrow should be proposed on the wiki page.[1]
[1]https://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Package_categories
--
Ryan Abel
Maemo Community Council chair
_
On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:41 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
> ext Ryan Abel wrote:
>> Yes, a structured plan with enough open-endedness to keep the
>> creativity
>> flowing would be best. A Diablo-based community branch (perhaps
>> combined
>> with osv-c) might be helpful as a test-bed for some of the wilder
ext Ryan Abel wrote:
> Yes, a structured plan with enough open-endedness to keep the creativity
> flowing would be best. A Diablo-based community branch (perhaps combined
> with osv-c) might be helpful as a test-bed for some of the wilder ideas
> before pushing them to the proper Fremantle develo
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Simon Pickering wrote:
>> - Development worklow? Do you want to have a structured
>> process with an
>> agreed set of features in scope, a UI plan and so on or do you see
>> better to continue the ad hoc approach of discussion+patches?
>> Specially
>> if you expect us
"ext Andrew Flegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marius Vollmer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Sources are now on Gitorious:
>>
>>http://gitorious.org/projects/hildon-application-manager
>
> Why the move to git? Is this just some tool fetishism or did the sv
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marius Vollmer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Application manager for Fremantle is developed openly:
>
>http://hildon-app-mgr.garage.maemo.org/devel.html
Glad to see this has been updated :-)
> Sources are now on Gitorious:
>
>http://gitorious.org/proj
"ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The community has plans, Nokia, but they're really hard to act on
> unless we know what you're up to. Help us to help you. :)
The Application manager for Fremantle is developed openly:
http://hildon-app-mgr.garage.maemo.org/devel.html
Sources ar
> - Development worklow? Do you want to have a structured
> process with an
> agreed set of features in scope, a UI plan and so on or do you see
> better to continue the ad hoc approach of discussion+patches?
> Specially
> if you expect us providing i.e. nice icons this is not something that
>
ext Ryan Abel wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
>> However, although I think the new UI is an improvement, it shouldn't
>> be the UI which gets into fremantle's Application Manager for the
>> default starting point of installing an app; it should be *much*
>> prettier,
2008/10/29 Andrew Flegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> Agree with all that. However, if "Programming" is a better English
>> term than "Development" - which I agree with - surely the section name
>> should be "users
"ext Andrew Flegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it's important they all fit, so an interim version which
> shaves the pixels off (although that assumes the font size isn't
> increased) would be useful.
That's what I did: there are now three columns and five rows visible
without scrolling
"ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So while they should be valid, localized sections from h-a-m's point
> of view, they shouldn't be valid sections for packages (I don't want
> to see any debs with user/other or user/all ;)).
Yes, very good point.
__
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Agree with all that. However, if "Programming" is a better English
> term than "Development" - which I agree with - surely the section name
> should be "users/programming"?
Why, though? The "technical English" k
2008/10/29 Andrew Flegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1) "Consistency" - with what? Why is consistency between the package
> maintainer's key and the displayed text /in one language/
> important?
>
> 2) These are *example* English versions. Further discussions have
> resulted in other s
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Glen Ditchfield wrote:
>
>> In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail
>> end of the
>> key. For consistency, could the English string in this case
>> be "Development"?
>
> W
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Glen Ditchfield wrote:
> Ryan Abel wrote:
>> KeyEnglish i18n Examples
>> user/development ProgrammingPy2Deb
>
> In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail
> end of the
> key. For consistency, could the English string in
Ryan Abel wrote:
> Key English i18n Examples
> user/development Programming Py2Deb
In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail end of the
key. For consistency, could the English string in this case
be "Development"?
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> However, although I think the new UI is an improvement, it shouldn't
> be the UI which gets into fremantle's Application Manager for the
> default starting point of installing an app; it should be *much*
> prettier, with icons 'n' stuff.
Clearl
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On that note, in windowed mode, there are 12 category buttons visible
> on-screen with Jaffa's patch, but the 5th line (which would bring us
> to 15 categories) is almost (but not quite) completely visible on
> screen. Does a
I'll note that I've added
user/science ScienceScientific and engineering
applications
To the list on the wiki at the request of Yves (who, presumably,
accidentally emailed me directly off-list). I figure it makes sense to
have a Science section if we have an Education section
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> "ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So after a fair bit of discussion, we've arrive at a suitable list of
>> package categories:
>
> Excellent! Just for completeness, what about also listing "All" and
> "Others"? These need to be
"ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So after a fair bit of discussion, we've arrive at a suitable list of
> package categories:
Excellent! Just for completeness, what about also listing "All" and
"Others"? These need to be translated as well, but maybe it is better
to keep them out
22 matches
Mail list logo
