On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 19:30 +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
Battery life eating is a particularly tricky bug to nail down to a
single application (or home applet).
Yes, for PCs and even laptops most issues are almost unnoticeable by
average users, but in our case any non-optimization (leave alone
ext Graham Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Click to install doesn't work on the 770.
It works 'somwewhat'. The Application Manager will silently ignore
files that are not compatible with the 770 instead of complaining
loudly. (I don't really remember if there was a good reason for this
or if I
Eero Tamminen wrote:
You use extra hardware for that, not software. :-)
Extra hardware may not be needed.
But anyway, that is not really relevant information when talking
about applications. The question is not how much doing a thing
consumes power, but is doing that thing really something
Hi,
ext Frantisek Dufka wrote:
True. But still seeing power consumption could help and having actual
current drawn from battery somewhere in /proc would be very useful in
many situations.
Even if I agree with things you said I still think your response is
influenced by the fact that Nokia
Hrmmff... One of these days I'll stop embarassing myself ;)
/usr/sbin I guess, but it's in my path when I'm root, so I just type visudo.
If it's not there automatically, I can't think of what might have installed
it. I did find this thread [1] on the ITT forums that shows others using it
with no
On 17/08/07, Eero Tamminen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
ext Frantisek Dufka wrote:
True. But still seeing power consumption could help and having actual
current drawn from battery somewhere in /proc would be very useful in
many situations.
snip
These were just examples and some of
Hi,
ext Michael Thompson wrote:
On 17/08/07, Eero Tamminen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Frantisek Dufka wrote:
True. But still seeing power consumption could help and having actual
current drawn from battery somewhere in /proc would be very useful in
many situations.
snip
These were just
On 17/08/07, Eero Tamminen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
ext Michael Thompson wrote:
On 17/08/07, Eero Tamminen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Frantisek Dufka wrote:
True. But still seeing power consumption could help and having actual
current drawn from battery somewhere in /proc would
We are planning to reorganize the products and components structure in
http://bugs.maemo.org in order to make it more user friendly and
manageable. We also want to have a structure platform-centric, without
being so defined by hardware as it is now.
On Friday 17 August 2007 09:23, Marius Vollmer wrote:
But, downloads.maemo.org claims that GPE Calendar works with both IT
OS 2007 and IT OS 2006, so the .install file should have entries for
both. It only has one for IT OS 2007, tho, and that is the problem:
Ah, sorry for that. I
Thanks a ton! -- Dave
Click to install doesn't work on the 770. You have to add the repository to
the Application Manager by hand. In the Application Manager, use the
Tools/Application catalogue... menu item and add a new catalogue. If you go
to http://www.cobb.uk.net/770 you will see
Here's something that shows the promise of being practical and useful
-- the new version (2.0 Beta) of Glide on a PC/Mac/Linux desktop
combined with 770/800 access through GlideMobile. Plus a GlideSync
application for convenient uploading from the desktop.
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:46 +0300, Eero Tamminen wrote:
How do we know what the actual current consumption is?
You use extra hardware for that, not software. :-)
I always wondered if the N800 platform made this information available.
I'm still wondering what the proprietary power management
On Thursday 16 August 2007 20:44:16 Paul Klapperich wrote:
On 8/16/07, James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On this one visudo is not on the box but the real solution is don't
chmod the file. VI it as root, then instead of doing wq to quit (write
quit) do wq! (w q then
14 matches
Mail list logo
