On 25/01/2008, Steve Yelvington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since adding GSM capability would bulk up the basic unit, it seems that
> perhaps an external GSM enabler would be a good move. Connect via
> Bluetooth. Maybe even make it work as a speaker/mike, so I don't have to
> wave the Internet tab
Kevin,
what is important about Nokia's assertion about building an Internet
Tablet that supports WIMAX in the U.S. ~2.4 ghz frequency band has to do
with two thing primarily:
a) Nokia would like to get a piece of the market action with a big
U.S. customer like Sprint, who up until now (
James,
re your comment:
"... It wouldn't take much to add an IP header to it.."
That is what the 3GPP^1 has been working toward lo these many years and
the standards are now emerging as the Long Term Evolution (LTE^2 )
technology for IMT-Advanced^3 (informally referred to as 4g) mobile
n
Gary wrote:
> Joshua Layne wrote:
>
>> What frequencies would this radio support? (850,900,1700,1800,1900,2100)
>> (1700 and 2100 are data only)
>> What data standards? EDGE? UMTS? HSDPA? and on which of the above
>> frequencies?
>>
>>
>
> Quad band phones are more common than they used
I take some of that back -- I remember using PGPfone over a dialup in
'95 and its performance at the time was impressive. Compare that to the
first GSM network going live in '91. But PKI's use in GSM is only for
network authentication and not en/decipherment of all traffic. Either
way, networks
Joshua Layne wrote:
> What frequencies would this radio support? (850,900,1700,1800,1900,2100)
> (1700 and 2100 are data only)
> What data standards? EDGE? UMTS? HSDPA? and on which of the above
> frequencies?
>
Quad band phones are more common than they used to be but GPRS, even
with EDGE, is
Adilson Oliveira wrote:
> Some time later he told me
> he spent about 30 minutes answering a lot of questions about why was he
> buying a cellphone without a cellphone plan.
Heh. I had a similar run-in ordering my N810 directly from Nokia (with
the dev discount coupon, IIRC). They had to do all t
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:22:44 -0500, "Jonathan Greene"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's pretty painless to switch the SIM card out. As long as it's open
> and not packaged from the carrier there should be no issue. I
> purchased an N95 NAM (north american) from the Nokia Store and put my
> iPho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Newcomb escreveu:
>> If you visit that www page you will see that they refer to the N800 as a
>>
>>
>> "Nokia N800 Internet Tablet Cell Phone"
>>
>>
> LOL. That's classic. And it's overpriced.
>
I have a good one about this. A friend ordere
> If you visit that www page you will see that they refer to the N800 as a
>
>
> "Nokia N800 Internet Tablet Cell Phone"
>
>
LOL. That's classic. And it's overpriced.
--
Thanks,
Aaron Newcomb
http://www.thesourceshow.org
http://www.opennewsshow.org
Gary,
I agree that bluetooth tethering is a great solution/workaround to the
need to sometimes use the N8XX as a voice communications device. The
problem I have is that when I have bluetooth + CDMA/EVDO turn on on my
mobile phone, it runs down the battery very quickly. I
would like to see Nok
Kevin T. Neely wrote:
> This is quite timely, since the FCC spectrum auction just went up today:
>
> https://auctionsignon.fcc.gov/signon/index.htm
>
> So don't look backward to 20th Century technology, look forward to ubiquitous
> wireless access, making VOIP a reality and ditching those SIM card
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jonathan Greene wrote:
> It's pretty painless to switch the SIM card out. As long as it's open
> and not packaged from the carrier there should be no issue.
I use GSM myself so I'm familiar with how easy it is to swap SIMs. But
only two carriers in the U.S. are GSM. Sprint
It's pretty painless to switch the SIM card out. As long as it's open
and not packaged from the carrier there should be no issue. I
purchased an N95 NAM (north american) from the Nokia Store and put my
iPhone ATT sim in and have been using it that way since ... no issues
- though the the MMS serv
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Steve Yelvington wrote:
> There are compromises to be made whether you take the integrated route
> (a la iPhone) or the component route (a la Nokia). I have an N800, a
The great thing about bluetooth tethering is that you can switch carriers
and not have to replace your tet
On Jan 24, 2008 5:01 PM, Julio Biason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/01/2008, at 7:13 AM, Alfredo J. Fabretti wrote:
>
> > I agree, add cell phone support to the next tablet and it'll be the
> > killer device (yeah, I know the battery usage issue).
>
> Yeah, and then we would have to sign with
Clearwire has offered voip for the broadband wireless service around
here for almost a year in our area (Seattle, WA USA). I think our area
has been part of their beta test.
Bandwidth seems to be a modest problem in our local experience
because Clearwire wireless broadband is a popular o
Since adding GSM capability would bulk up the basic unit, it seems that
perhaps an external GSM enabler would be a good move. Connect via
Bluetooth. Maybe even make it work as a speaker/mike, so I don't have to
wave the Internet tablet around in the air to use the phone. It might
look like this
On 01/24/2008 11:49, sebastian maemo wrote:
> 2008/1/24, Tim Ashman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Absolutely NOT. I use Skype and Gizmo on my device and have no need for
> > cell
> > phone companies.
>
> But when there's no WiFi access point available, then a GSM/3G phone
> connection is really handy (
Interestingly clearwire announced they plan to offer voip using sip
today. As I am sure you all know they are sprint's partner in wimax
so it's not hard to connect the dots here.
We already have a sip stack and always on makes it quite easy to do
voice ... Assuming you live or work within an avai
Aaron,
the N800 and N810 Internet Tablet are what I would call pre-4g mobile
devices.
Nokia has asserted that is is going to launch a WIMAX version of the
Internet Tablet for use on Sprint's Xohm (WIMAX) Network. If Nokia
follows through on its announced intent (I think they will), then that
On Jan 24, 2008 8:01 PM, Julio Biason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/01/2008, at 7:13 AM, Alfredo J. Fabretti wrote:
>
> > I agree, add cell phone support to the next tablet and it'll be the
> > killer device (yeah, I know the battery usage issue).
>
> Yeah, and then we would have to sign with
On 25/01/2008, at 7:13 AM, Alfredo J. Fabretti wrote:
> I agree, add cell phone support to the next tablet and it'll be the
> killer device (yeah, I know the battery usage issue).
Yeah, and then we would have to sign with a telephone company too, a
la iPhone + AT&T deal...
_
On Jan 24, 2008 5:59 PM, Aaron Newcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 2:32 PM, Tim Ashman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Absolutely NOT. I use Skype and Gizmo on my device and have no need for
> > cell
> > phone companies.
> >
> Don't get me wrong. I love the fact that I can use Sky
On Jan 24, 2008 2:32 PM, Tim Ashman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely NOT. I use Skype and Gizmo on my device and have no need for cell
> phone companies.
>
Don't get me wrong. I love the fact that I can use Skype or Gizmo and
make calls from the current models. However, I am on the road a l
2008/1/24, Tim Ashman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Absolutely NOT. I use Skype and Gizmo on my device and have no need for
> cell
> phone companies.
>
But when there's no WiFi access point available, then a GSM/3G phone
connection is really handy (German joke)...
_
Absolutely NOT. I use Skype and Gizmo on my device and have no need for cell
phone companies.
I sure hope NONE of the current cell phone companies win the FCC auction.
tim
On 01/24/2008 08:38, Aaron Newcomb wrote:
> OK enthusiasts, when is this going to happen? I talked about this a
> lot wi
> So don't look backward to 20th Century technology, look forward to ubiquitous
> wireless access, making VOIP a reality and ditching those SIM cards forever.
I couldn't agree more. The Internet Tablets are for the post-phone
era (which, IMO, can't come soon enough).
--
"My Universe is my eye
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:38:29AM -0500, Aaron Newcomb wrote:
> OK enthusiasts, when is this going to happen? I talked about this a
> lot with attendees of the last Ohio LInuxfest and it is clear that the
> next generation of this device needs a phone. I know that there will
This is quite timely
I can't imagine Nokia commenting on this publicly ...
I agree though - dedicated wireless would be very cool. The first
take will be the WiMax enabled device which should show itself
sometime in Q2 from what I've read. You'll need to live in a place
that can take advantage of this of course, but
OK enthusiasts, when is this going to happen? I talked about this a
lot with attendees of the last Ohio LInuxfest and it is clear that the
next generation of this device needs a phone. I know that there will
be squabbles with the carriers about not being able to lock down the
features (in the US at
31 matches
Mail list logo