Tuukka Tolvanen wrote:
On 5/10/08, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I've noticed is that there seems to be some kind of proxy
thing going on when I try to go to a Web site: instead of just going
directly to the site I selected, there's some sort of
"wysiwyg.something"
On 5/10/08, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing I've noticed is that there seems to be some kind of proxy
> thing going on when I try to go to a Web site: instead of just going
> directly to the site I selected, there's some sort of
> "wysiwyg.something" address that shows in the addre
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Of course, but the UI layer is deeper than that. I'm not sure the
> developers optimizing XUL for Fennec would agree on "the UI is a
> non-issue". Funtionality and performance in the UI layer is a serious
> issue for any browse
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Kevin T. Neely
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:48:33AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> In my earlier post I said that our browser development is being done
>> nowadays on the Gecko trunk (practically same as Fennec) and we are also
>> willi
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:48:33AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In my earlier post I said that our browser development is being done
> nowadays on the Gecko trunk (practically same as Fennec) and we are also
> willing to embrace the Firefox add-on developer community. Fennec will
Will we see
Hi,
> This is actually where the Mozilla version has a very distinct
> advantage: they plan to support plug-ins, and there will be
> much more functionality. The current MicroB has some serious
> shortcomings in that area. There are some rather basic and
> important settings and functionality
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:53:29AM -0400, Jonathan Greene wrote:
> I tend to use the mobile version of GR, which I don't really like, but
> at least it's reliable. They need to do much more than a single item,
ust fired up reader on my 800 and it appears to be working, albeit slowly
(might blame
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Uwe Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sounds very nice! I do want take a look... :)
> ...but is it possible to use the browser without a hardware keyboard?
> The virtual one of os2008 doesen't work, right?
>
> My first impressions are:
> - no field for input
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Kevin T. Neely
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 04:50:54PM +0200, Aniello Del Sorbo wrote:
>>
>> MicroB opens my Google Reader page with no issue at all, and is actually
>> quite fast.
>
>
> Lucky, it doesn't work for me. Fennec is still pretty
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 04:50:54PM +0200, Aniello Del Sorbo wrote:
>
> MicroB opens my Google Reader page with no issue at all, and is actually
> quite fast.
Lucky, it doesn't work for me. Fennec is still pretty unusable for me on an
n800, although i have it installed and am waiting for an upd
Jonathan Greene schrieb:
> I love the Fennec browser though it could clearly use less memory, be
> more stable and launch more quickly. ;)
>
That sounds very nice! I do want take a look... :)
...but is it possible to use the browser without a hardware keyboard?
The virtual one of os2008 doesen'
Same feeling :)
--
Anidel
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Jonathan Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have a feeling that my 915 subscriptions have something to do with
> the load issues. ;)
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Aniello Del Sorbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > That's weird,
I have a feeling that my 915 subscriptions have something to do with
the load issues. ;)
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Aniello Del Sorbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's weird,
>
> MicroB opens my Google Reader page with no issue at all, and is actually
> quite fast.
>
> --
> anidel
>
> On
That's weird,
MicroB opens my Google Reader page with no issue at all, and is actually
quite fast.
--
anidel
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Jonathan Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I love the Fennec browser though it could clearly use less memory, be
> more stable and launch more quickly.
I love the Fennec browser though it could clearly use less memory, be
more stable and launch more quickly. ;)
It can actually render my Google Reader page which MicroB cannot ... I
find it super responsive and hope we see it packaged in a future
release. What I understood from the original Ars p
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But users don't deal with engines alone, you have the UI in between and
> this is where the Mozilla browser in Chinook and Fennec differ most: the
> first uses an own UI providing -as for today- much better performance
> that XUL
Hi,
ext John Holmblad wrote:
> All,
>
> for those who have not already seen the article whose url is:
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080409-first-look-mozilla-fennec-targets-handheld-browser-market.html
>
> It provides a comparison of the performance of Microb versus Fennec o
17 matches
Mail list logo
