On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 19:10 +0100, ext Neil MacLeod wrote:
If Nokia Internet Tablet staff wish that the Maemo mailing lists are kept
platform neutral
I didn't mean to keep the list platform neutral. I meant to keep it on
topic with the maemo platform: open source software for maemo + Nokia
Quim Gil wrote:
Now, a question and a long thought for the maemo lovers:
What do you think we should do? Bring the Nokia devices/commercial
agenda also here or keep maemo apart from that?
I guess until other non-Nokia Maemo-based devices exist (mid 2008?), Maemo ==
Nokia and vice versa.
Hanno, Neil, Randall co. Your comments are very interesting. I have
already reported to the right people internally quoting some of your
insightful thoughts and linking to this whole thread. I'm confident we
will do better next time.
Now, a question and a long thought for the maemo lovers:
What
Am Dienstag 03 Juli 2007 08:02 schrieb Quim Gil:
What do you think we should do? Bring the Nokia devices/commercial
agenda also here or keep maemo apart from that?
We shouldn't make this an either-or black-and-white question.
In one hand we are trying to build a maemo community based on
What do you think we should do? Bring the Nokia devices/commercial
agenda also here or keep maemo apart from that?
Maemo should work to function and be perceived as an independent
organization from Nokia. It should work toward an independent server
infrastructure and a governance model that
On Tue, 2007-03-07 at 17:37 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
On 7/3/07, Kevin T. Neely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example: Poor Skype just couldn't get their software ready, however,
and I went with Gizmo. I likely would have anyway, as the open source
model appeals to me and I see no
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:37:01PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
On 7/3/07, Kevin T. Neely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example: Poor Skype just couldn't get their software ready,
however, and I went with Gizmo. I likely would have anyway, as the
open source model appeals to me and I see
