On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Tux99 tux99-...@uridium.org wrote:
What is to be gained by removing the support for these architectures?
I would say if it doesn't have any practical advantage (apart from 'code
cleanliness') then I would keep them, even if nobody wants to support
those
On 24.02.2011 11:06, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 08:27:36, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Am Donnerstag 24 Februar 2011, 08:20:41 schrieb Tux99:
I have always hated that apps 'disappear' in the Other folders, can we
not completely get rid of the Other folders, they don't make
Dexter Morgan a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Tux99tux99-...@uridium.org wrote:
What is to be gained by removing the support for these architectures?
I would say if it doesn't have any practical advantage (apart from 'code
cleanliness') then I would keep them, even if nobody
Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 08:27:36, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Am Donnerstag 24 Februar 2011, 08:20:41 schrieb Tux99:
I have always hated that apps 'disappear' in the Other folders, can we
not completely get rid of the Other folders, they don't make any sense
(at
On 24 February 2011 08:14, Tux99 tux99-...@uridium.org wrote:
What is to be gained by removing the support for these architectures?
I would say if it doesn't have any practical advantage (apart from 'code
cleanliness') then I would keep them, even if nobody wants to support
those archs now,
Ok, seems I will have to learn a new way of working after getting
along for many years with many Linux flavors very well.
Say, with a new laptop which has a 360 Go harddisk with Windows
preinstalled - which is one of the top most user cases:
1. I start windows, move everything from D:\ to C:\
Hi everyone,
On 24 February 2011 13:27, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
This is not the number of click, but the fact that it take a longer time
to scan the whole menu. Like reading a article with and without carriage
return. The number of word to read are the same, but it is easier with
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Now with LVM, what do I do?
Pretty much exactly the same, if that's what you want. LVM is just a
layer of indirection that you place on top of *only* those partitions
you want LVM to control. It lets you create multiple virtual
partitions each of which includes one
Hi packagers,
I have just tested and our build system supports having a noarch
subpackage together with arch specific ones.
So please, have noarch data/doc packages (expecially for games or
other stuff with huge data), this will allow them to not be duplicated
on mirrors
On 24 February 2011 14:52, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi packagers,
I have just tested and our build system supports having a noarch
subpackage together with arch specific ones.
So please, have noarch data/doc packages (expecially for games or
other stuff with huge data), this
On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote:
And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't adapted, what's the
point re-emerging it now given that changing the new isn't easy now
that the infra- is already in place.
In 4+ months, a lot will be changed/corrected.
In my
2011/2/24 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote:
And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't adapted, what's the
point re-emerging it now given that changing the new isn't easy now
that the infra- is already in place.
Maarten Vanraes maarten.vanr...@gmail.com writes:
Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 23:53:01 schreef André Machado:
I was watching now and I realized that both mageia and Mandriva have ports
for both i586 and x64 architetures.
When Mageia is released, she will compete directly with Mandriva, even
Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com writes:
Hi packagers,
I have just tested and our build system supports having a noarch
subpackage together with arch specific ones.
So please, have noarch data/doc packages (expecially for games or
other stuff with huge data), this will allow them to not be
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 13:53 +0100, Jérôme Hénin a écrit :
Hi everyone,
On 24 February 2011 13:27, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
This is not the number of click, but the fact that it take a longer time
to scan the whole menu. Like reading a article with and without carriage
Quote: Michael Scherer wrote on Thu, 24 February 2011 13:27
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 10:06 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I don't think so. Several Mandriva releases ago, there was no such
More
entry, but real sub-categories in the menu. Then it changed for
what we have
On 24.02.2011 18:57, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: Michael Scherer wrote on Thu, 24 February 2011 13:27
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 10:06 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I don't think so. Several Mandriva releases ago, there was no such
More
entry, but real sub-categories in the menu. Then it
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 20:30 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 24.02.2011 18:57, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: Michael Scherer wrote on Thu, 24 February 2011 13:27
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 10:06 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I don't think so. Several Mandriva releases ago, there
nice thread :)
I prefer a 2-level menu tree. If people find that it makes too much
clicks,
This is not the number of click, but the fact that it take a longer time
to scan the whole menu. Like reading a article with and without carriage
return. The number of word to read are the same,
Le vendredi 25 février 2011 à 00:09 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 24.02.2011 21:15, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 20:30 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
I have about 15-30 entries in everyone of Internet, Office, Audio/Video,
Tools, Tools-System submenus.
By
On 25.02.2011 02:12, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 25 février 2011 à 00:09 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 24.02.2011 21:15, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 20:30 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
With a two-level system it would be considerably less and closer to the
~7
21 matches
Mail list logo
