I had this issue too, yesterday after my daily upgrade.
I cleant my ~/.config dir and all went fine again.
David
2011/3/26 Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com:
On 26 March 2011 00:13, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote:
This is probably an incredibly stupid question, but is LXDE expected
Op vrijdag 25 maart 2011 21:25:25 schreef Thomas Backlund:
Ahmad Samir skrev 25.3.2011 20:59:
The repo name in installations is Core Testing, so the inconsistency
is not fully my fault :)
Not anymore...
I fixed the naming 12 days ago when I added media.cfg to svn.
But since you
Romain d'Alverny a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:38, Tux99tux99-...@uridium.org wrote:
Also is there an official rule somewhere that specifies:
because we don't want to have software built on a deprecated library in
the repository
or is this simply an arbitrary rule that restricts
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:33:04AM +0100, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: andr55 wrote on Fri, 25 March 2011 01:29
My though was essentially that firmware is so close to hardware that
its
actual free/non-free status shouldn't apply - we should treat it like
(almost) part of the hardware.
I
Op zaterdag 26 maart 2011 13:19:10 schreef Michael scherer:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:33:04AM +0100, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: andr55 wrote on Fri, 25 March 2011 01:29
My though was essentially that firmware is so close to hardware that
its
actual free/non-free status shouldn't apply -
congratulations obgr_seneca :)
On 26 March 2011 02:15, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2011 00:13, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote:
This is probably an incredibly stupid question, but is LXDE expected to work
in conjunction with GDM ?
I thought I'd give LXDE a try, but both from my usual ID
lör 2011-03-26 klockan 10:44 +0200 skrev Maarten Vanraes:
Op vrijdag 25 maart 2011 21:25:25 schreef Thomas Backlund:
Ahmad Samir skrev 25.3.2011 20:59:
The repo name in installations is Core Testing, so the inconsistency
is not fully my fault :)
Not anymore...
I fixed the naming
Op zaterdag 26 maart 2011 20:49:54 schreef Thomas Backlund:
lör 2011-03-26 klockan 10:44 +0200 skrev Maarten Vanraes:
Op vrijdag 25 maart 2011 21:25:25 schreef Thomas Backlund:
Ahmad Samir skrev 25.3.2011 20:59:
The repo name in installations is Core Testing, so the
inconsistency is
On 24.03.2011 22:27, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 20:08, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.03.2011 19:35, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
Summary (from http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=licensing_policy):
* core: stuff that is not Free/Open Source according to
Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi schrieb am 26.03.2011
I don't really have a strong preference here, as long as
1) it is consistent, and
2) users are happy (e.g. no situation where even the free radeon
driver doesn't work with any ISO)
Couldn't we have the following:
- Live CDs (like
Op zaterdag 26 maart 2011 23:15:22 schreef Oliver Burger:
Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi schrieb am 26.03.2011
I don't really have a strong preference here, as long as
1) it is consistent, and
2) users are happy (e.g. no situation where even the free radeon
driver doesn't work with
On 03/26/2011 01:11 AM, andre999 wrote:
Frank Griffin a écrit :
From what you say, there are not a lot of points of disagreement
between us, on this issue.
We both have contributed to open source for a long time, you
apparently mostly on developement/packaging, myself mostly
translating/
On 03/26/2011 06:37 PM, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
During the times mandriva had several CDs to install it, the new ones often
only dl'ed one and complained when stuff didn't work.
I forsee possibly here the same issue with this, people will forget to
download the extra non_free CD, or do not care
Quote: Frank Griffin wrote on Sun, 27 March 2011 00:34
For you to complain that because you have minimal network access, the
rest of the Mageia community should bend over backwards to avoid your
having to swap a few CDs during install is a pretty hollow argument, in
my opinion.
And why
15 matches
Mail list logo
