On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
It looks like our BS is becoming hungry to eat built packages:
Submitted User Package Target Media Status Build time
18 hours ago wally libcanberra-0.28-3.mga2 cauldron core/release
2011/8/29 r...@mageia.org:
Revision 135989 Author ze Date 2011-08-29 08:09:56 +0200 (Mon, 29 Aug 2011)
Log Message
- cmake its already builrequires by kde-macros
- this way we dont force building strictly with OpenJDK
- remove clean section (done by default)
- simple way to list dirs
-
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 08:02 +0200, D.Morgan a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
It looks like our BS is becoming hungry to eat built packages:
Submitted UserPackage Target Media Status Build time
18 hours agowally
On 11/08/25 16:41 +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote:
i therefore propose to apply the following patch:
$ svn di
Index: find-provides.in
===
--- find-provides.in(révision 1889)
+++ find-provides.in(copie de travail)
@@ -47,7
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 13:47 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 08:02 +0200, D.Morgan a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
It looks like our BS is becoming hungry to eat built packages:
Submitted User
2011/8/29 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
After looking at the problem, I suspect it could be linked to texmf.
Each time iurt install it, the process stop.
Will updating texlive help? It seems Mandriva's texlive packages are
currently well-maintained.
Yet, I have no more idea, and couldn't
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/29 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
After looking at the problem, I suspect it could be linked to texmf.
Each time iurt install it, the process stop.
Will updating texlive help? It seems Mandriva's texlive packages are
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 13:47 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 08:02 +0200, D.Morgan a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
It looks like our BS is becoming
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Funda Wang wrote:
2011/8/29 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
After looking at the problem, I suspect it could be linked to texmf.
Each time iurt install it, the process stop.
Will updating texlive help? It seems Mandriva's texlive packages are
currently well-maintained.
Hi all,
The topic came up what to do with small cosmetic fixes in packages which
are part of the official release. See for instance the following bug
report: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784
Should we push these things as an update (and spending GB's of bandwidth
for all the
Anyway, I've split out texlive deps out of gtk-doc, so normal gnome
packages will be faster when building.
2011/8/29 Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com:
2011/8/29 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
After looking at the problem, I suspect it could be linked to texmf.
Each time iurt install it, the
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 18:38 +0200, Remco Rijnders a écrit :
Hi all,
The topic came up what to do with small cosmetic fixes in packages which
are part of the official release. See for instance the following bug
report: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784
Should we push these
Remco Rijnders a écrit :
Hi all,
The topic came up what to do with small cosmetic fixes in packages which
are part of the official release. See for instance the following bug
report: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784
Should we push these things as an update (and spending GB's of
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:18:47 -0400, andre999 andre999@laposte.net wrote:
it seems most appropriate to
(1) have a minimal QA for the change, and
(2) push the package with a low (lowest) priority
Agreed. As long as qa knows it's a cosmetic change, we'll primarily be
checking that the
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:06 PM, nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Jani Välimaa wrote:
2011/8/28 Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com:
Why did you rebuild these? They have been obsoleted in i586 with php-pear-
Horde packages with mostly the same name.
As most of you may have noticed,
we already needed to update Firefox for Mageia 1, as Mozilla EOL'ed older
firefox releases with each new one. For thunderbird the situation is a bit
different, in a short summary:
Thunderbird 6 has been released, and EOL'ed Thunderbird 5, available for
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Florian Hubold wrote:
After all we need a decision how to proceed. So what's your opinion?
Decision on what ?
Am 30.08.2011 01:15, schrieb nicolas vigier:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Florian Hubold wrote:
After all we need a decision how to proceed. So what's your opinion?
Decision on what ?
On the subject ^^ isn't that obvious?
thunderbird update for mageia 1: update to 6.0 or go with 3.1 branch?
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:22:14 -0400, Florian Hubold doktor5...@arcor.de wrote:
After all we need a decision how to proceed. So what's your opinion?
I'd like to see 3.* releases go to updates, and 6 and following, to
backports, with only the latest version kept there.
Regards, Dave Hodgins
2011/8/29 John Balcaen mik...@mageia.org:
2011/8/29 r...@mageia.org:
Revision 135989 Author ze Date 2011-08-29 08:09:56 +0200 (Mon, 29 Aug 2011)
Log Message
- cmake its already builrequires by kde-macros
- this way we dont force building strictly with OpenJDK
- remove clean section (done
2011/8/30 Zé mmode...@gmail.com:
%if %with_java
-BuildRequires: java-rpmbuild
+BuildRequires: java-devel
BuildRequires: chrpath
%endif
This is stupid.
The problem was that i didnt saw the part in the end about the
problems of the GCJ/Jamvm alternatives.
So this i imediatly reverted.
21 matches
Mail list logo
