On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:25:19PM +0100, Thierry wrote in
caonretzx+xuw-tbvmzoaacp4f35798i5jlzkiwlwwhcof02...@mail.gmail.com:
rpm -qp --suggests foo.rpm
The long form would be
rpm -qp --queryformat %{SUGGESTS} foo.rpm
Not until that patch is applied:
Le 24/02/2012 00:27, Pascal Terjan a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 22:44, Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org wrote:
Mystification badge will redonner it tomorrow
If you say so :)
I generated the list (138 packages)
I should stop sending message from my phone... :)
Thanks for fixing
--
Anne
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:24:22PM +0100, mitya wrote:
mitya mitya 0.12.1-3.mga2:
+ Revision: 213565
- Fix build (see GNOME bug #669378)
Cool! Couldn't figure out where the bug was (cogl, vala, libchamplain,
etc), so nice to see it is magically resolved :)
--
Regards,
Olav
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:51:25PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
A bunch of GNOME modules now have --enable-systemd configure flags. This
will make them use systemd instead of (deprecated ConsoleKit) to track
login sessions.
[..]
These seem to be compile time checks. Meaning: if --enable-systemd
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But once
more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which make the
list less readable. For a beginner, this is more annoying.
So, I have unselected Core 32 bit and everything seams to be ok. As pcpa said
On 24.02.2012 12:09, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But once
more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which make the
list less readable. For a beginner, this is more annoying.
So, I have unselected Core 32 bit
24.02.2012 13:09, Pierre Jarillon kirjutas:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But once
more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which make the
list less readable. For a beginner, this is more annoying.
So, I have unselected Core 32 bit
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But
once
more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which make the
list less readable. For a beginner, this is more annoying.
I have also noticed that some
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 12:14:30, nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But
once more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which
make the list less readable. For a
On Friday, 24 February 2012 13:09:45 Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But
once more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which
make the list less readable.
Then rpmdrake shouldn't be showing libraries by default.
nicolas vigier skrev 24.2.2012 13:14:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But once
more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which make the
list less readable. For a beginner, this is more
Hi,
New dracut. Should help fix graphical issues experienced after switching
to xz compressed kernel modules (KMS modules were not include in the
initramfs and were sometimes not loaded properly when the real fs kicked
in).
The other big change here is to automatically generate a much bigger
'Twas brillig, and David W. Hodgins at 24/02/12 02:17 did gyre and gimble:
In Mageia 1, which nic is assigned eth0 or eth1 etc, is controlled
by /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules.
In beta 1, /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules is not being
created, although I can't figure out
'Twas brillig, and Claire Robinson at 24/02/12 12:00 did gyre and gimble:
On 24/02/12 11:39, Thomas Backlund wrote:
nicolas vigier skrev 24.2.2012 13:14:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro.
But once
more, I was
On Friday, 24 February 2012 13:14:30 nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But
once more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which
make the list less readable. For a
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:04 +0200
Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
I think rpmdrake should only show x86_64 packages
on x86_64 by default.
So, rpmdrake shouldn't show get-skype or wine32?
That sounds less usable to me.
I guess it could hide 32-bit packages when there's
On Friday, 24 February 2012 14:30:10 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:04 +0200
Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
I think rpmdrake should only show x86_64 packages
on x86_64 by default.
So, rpmdrake shouldn't show get-skype or wine32?
That sounds
Buchan Milne a écrit :
On Friday, 24 February 2012 13:14:30 nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But
once more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which
make the
Colin Guthrie skrev 24.2.2012 14:13:
noarch packages should be available in both, but as a quirk urpmi and
friends sometimes prefer downloading them via the 32 bit repo. If the
repo was removed it should find them via the 64 bit repo happily.
Afaik tv fixed this recently, so it will prerfer
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:37:48 +0200
Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
On Friday, 24 February 2012 14:30:10 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:04 +0200
Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
I think rpmdrake should only show x86_64 packages
on
On 24/02/12 13:02, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Colin Guthrie skrev 24.2.2012 14:13:
noarch packages should be available in both, but as a quirk urpmi and
friends sometimes prefer downloading them via the 32 bit repo. If the
repo was removed it should find them via the 64 bit repo happily.
Afaik
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Friday, 24 February 2012 13:14:30 nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But
once more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake
24.02.2012 00:36, Anne nicolas kirjoitti:
Hi there
While working on debugging isos, we found out that a big cleanning
should be done on rpmsrate. Below a list of packages non available in
Mageia. Can you please add a status
deprecated
imported
don't import
so that we can clean this
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 14:22, Anssi Hannula an...@mageia.org wrote:
24.02.2012 00:36, Anne nicolas kirjoitti:
Hi there
While working on debugging isos, we found out that a big cleanning
should be done on rpmsrate. Below a list of packages non available in
Mageia. Can you please add a status
24.02.2012 16:25, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 14:22, Anssi Hannula an...@mageia.org wrote:
24.02.2012 00:36, Anne nicolas kirjoitti:
Hi there
While working on debugging isos, we found out that a big cleanning
should be done on rpmsrate. Below a list of packages non
On 24 February 2012 15:22, Anssi Hannula an...@mageia.org wrote:
I guess tetex-latex should be replaced by texlive, not removed?
It isn't very clear to me if listing it in Deprecated / Do not import
means it would be removed, which would be wrong AFAICS. It should rather
be replaced.
Hm,
On 24 February 2012 12:09, Pierre Jarillon jaril...@abul.org wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But once
more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which make the
list less readable. For a beginner, this is more annoying.
So, I have
On 24 February 2012 12:31, Buchan Milne bgmi...@zarb.org wrote:
On Friday, 24 February 2012 13:09:45 Pierre Jarillon wrote:
I have just installed Mga2b1 x86_64 and it is already a great distro. But
once more, I was annoyed with an unuseful bunch of rpm in rpmdrake which
make the list less
On 24 February 2012 13:13, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
noarch packages should be available in both, but as a quirk urpmi and
friends sometimes prefer downloading them via the 32 bit repo. If the
repo was removed it should find them via the 64 bit repo happily.
It now always
The release of Mageia2 Beta 1 was announced in Linux Today News for
anyone interested in reading it.
http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/mageia-2-beta-1-released/
Richard
On 02/24/2012 09:27 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
On 24 February 2012 13:13, Colin Guthriemag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Op vrijdag 24 februari 2012 15:19:02 schreef nicolas vigier:
[...]
Yes I think that would be nice. And only showing one entry for multiple
versions of the same package, defaulting to the latest version (currently
all versions from release and updates repositories are shown).
yes, that would
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 à 12:12 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
I think wine is using 32bit packages too.
I think people who are able to use wine ( who is far from being fool
proof enough ) are also able to read a doc explaining how to enable 32
bits repositories, and wine by itself is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/23/2012 07:37 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
On 23 February 2012 12:00, zezinho lists.jjo...@free.fr wrote:
How easy should the upgrade from Beta 1 - Beta 2 - RC - Release be?
It is not supported, the only upgrade path is MGA1-MGA2.
But it
Michael Scherer skrev 24.2.2012 19:14:
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 à 12:12 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
I think wine is using 32bit packages too.
I think people who are able to use wine ( who is far from being fool
proof enough ) are also able to read a doc explaining how to enable 32
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Robins jeffrobins...@gmail.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
3) I installed a second NIC in the machine and the eth0 and eth1 aliases
keep sometimes switch between the two
- I already saw a bug report about this, but it is really
Thomas Backlund a écrit :
Michael Scherer skrev 24.2.2012 19:14:
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 à 12:12 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
I think wine is using 32bit packages too.
I think people who are able to use wine ( who is far from being fool
proof enough ) are also able to read a doc
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 16:24:31, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
No.
Ony may want to run the 32bit version of some program because it eat less
memory (eg: firefox)
I agree. If I try to summary all this discuss, we should :
- default to disable 32b on x86_64
- only show latest and best vlc :
Hi..
I have updated Cauldron on several boxes, all x86-64 went ok and now I
even got rid of libcogl7, everything updated.
But on i586 update is sill blocked for some packages, as it looks like
gnome-themes-standard-3.3.90.1 for i586 got lost in the ether:
Some requested packages cannot be
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 22:25:39, Sander Lepik a écrit :
Sorry, but i can't agree. Why is it so bad if 32-bit Core is enabled? Hide
32-bit packages when there is 64-bit package too. But don't break
usability. get-skype is noarch package. That means it is in 64-bit nonfree
too. So user
On 25.02.2012 01:00, zezinho wrote:
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 22:25:39, Sander Lepik a écrit :
Sorry, but i can't agree. Why is it so bad if 32-bit Core is enabled? Hide
32-bit packages when there is 64-bit package too. But don't break
usability. get-skype is noarch package. That means it is
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:42:01 -0500, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
The other big change here is to automatically generate a much bigger
initramfs when doing an upgrade from mga1. This will include a lot more
I just tried it running dracut in a chroot from mga1, and got the
bigger
25. helmikuuta 2012 0.34 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com kirjoitti:
Hi..
I have updated Cauldron on several boxes, all x86-64 went ok and now I
even got rid of libcogl7, everything updated.
But on i586 update is sill blocked for some packages, as it looks like
gnome-themes-standard-3.3.90.1
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:42:01 -0500, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
The other big change here is to automatically generate a much bigger
initramfs when doing an upgrade from mga1. This will include a lot more
stuff (e.g. lvm, raid etc) that may or may not be needed on a given
setup,
Hello!
I'm going to add a volume mixer for a default desktop in Window Maker.
What is the name of the binary of the gnome mixer applet? I am looking
for something modern against pulseaudio.
Regards
44 matches
Mail list logo
