On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 07:04, You-Cheng Hsieh yochenhs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Was the fontconfig rules of google droid fonts used for any specific purpose?
http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/google-droid-fonts/current/SOURCES/
There is a Mageia1/cauldron bug which might be
2012/3/1 Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 07:04, You-Cheng Hsieh yochenhs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Was the fontconfig rules of google droid fonts used for any specific purpose?
http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/google-droid-fonts/current/SOURCES/
There is a
Hi all,
Looking at a recent bugreport [1] I see that /etc/profile sources
everything under /etc/profile.d/*.sh no matter what shell is being used.
In this case this resulted in a small annoyance for the user as one of the
scripts under there uses a bashishm that's not supported in all shells
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Remco Rijnders wrote:
Looking at a recent bugreport [1] I see that /etc/profile sources
everything under /etc/profile.d/*.sh no matter what shell is being
used. In this case this resulted in a small annoyance for the user
as one of the scripts under
On 01/03/12 09:50, You-Cheng Hsieh wrote:
2012/3/1 Pascal Terjanpter...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 07:04, You-Cheng Hsiehyochenhs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Was the fontconfig rules of google droid fonts used for any specific purpose?
On 03/01/2012 05:20 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Remco Rijnders wrote:
Looking at a recent bugreport [1] I see that /etc/profile sources
everything under /etc/profile.d/*.sh no matter what shell is being
used. In this case this resulted in a small annoyance
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:59:56AM -0500, Frank Griffin wrote:
IIRC there was a concerted effort in the Mandriva days to eliminate
bashisms in init scripts because (pre-systemd) there was a move to
replace bash with dash for initscripts. Backsliding ?
IIRC there is a tool which checks for
On 03/01/2012 08:08 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:59:56AM -0500, Frank Griffin wrote:
IIRC there was a concerted effort in the Mandriva days to eliminate
bashisms in init scripts because (pre-systemd) there was a move to
replace bash with dash for initscripts. Backsliding
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:08:56PM +0100, Olav wrote in
20120301130856.gb20...@bkor.dhs.org:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:59:56AM -0500, Frank Griffin wrote:
IIRC there was a concerted effort in the Mandriva days to eliminate
bashisms in init scripts because (pre-systemd) there was a move to
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 02:28:25 AM Jerome Quelin wrote:
On 12/02/22 09:40 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
It's still a requirement of Scribus (there is an upstream bug) and
PHP (Thomas is having look) + Perl (there are bugs against Jerome's
packages) modules.
perl-Test-Spelling
Hi,
Recently (last couple days) I've been seeing this kind of error/debug
when running rpm manually from the command line:
Freeing read locks for locker 0x809: 23048/140698330855168
It's generally repeated over and over.
Anyone else see this?
Col
--
Colin Guthrie
colin(at)mageia.org
On 1 March 2012 12:59, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote:
IIRC there was a concerted effort in the Mandriva days to eliminate bashisms
in init scripts because (pre-systemd) there was a move to replace bash with
dash for initscripts. Backsliding ?
That was just an idea, but nothing was
I noticed that on my system, some libraries are marked executable and others
aren't.
I know that certain libraries are executable, like libc, but i figure that this
is rather the exception rather than the rule.
I wonder if we should have some kind of policy about this?
I can be wrong, but i
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:22:37 schreef Maarten Vanraes:
[...]
forgot to add my counts from my system:
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64 -iname *.so -executable | sort |
uniq | wc -l
4113
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64 -iname *.so | sort | uniq | wc -
l
4147
[ ]$
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 21:22, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
I noticed that on my system, some libraries are marked executable and others
aren't.
I know that certain libraries are executable, like libc, but i figure that
this
is rather the exception rather than the rule.
Yes but I
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:36:08 schreef Pascal Terjan:
[...]
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
ok, thanks for your pov
01.03.2012 23:36, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
/usr/lib/rpm/mageia/find-debuginfo.sh:
# Strip ELF binaries
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ! -path ${debugdir}/*.debug -type f \
\( -perm -0100 -or -perm -0010 -or -perm -0001
On 01.03.2012 22:25, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:22:37 schreef Maarten Vanraes:
[...]
forgot to add my counts from my system:
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64 -iname *.so -executable | sort |
uniq | wc -l
4113
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:54:59 schreef Anssi Hannula:
01.03.2012 23:36, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
/usr/lib/rpm/mageia/find-debuginfo.sh:
# Strip ELF binaries
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ! -path ${debugdir}/*.debug -type f \
02.03.2012 00:03, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:54:59 schreef Anssi Hannula:
01.03.2012 23:36, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
/usr/lib/rpm/mageia/find-debuginfo.sh:
# Strip ELF binaries
find
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula:
[...]
does this mean debug info fails for these?
I'm not immediately sure (I never remember how the debug/stripping stuff
works exactly), but I think either a) debug symbols extraction and thus
-debug packaging, b) stripping, or c)
Den 23:17 1. mars 2012 skrev Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be følgende:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula:
[...]
does this mean debug info fails for these?
I'm not immediately sure (I never remember how the debug/stripping stuff
works exactly), but I think either a)
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:37:02 schreef Per Øyvind Karlsen:
[...]
rpmlint already has a check for unstripped files at least.. :)
does it also check only executable files?
Den 23:45 1. mars 2012 skrev Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be følgende:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:37:02 schreef Per Øyvind Karlsen:
[...]
rpmlint already has a check for unstripped files at least.. :)
does it also check only executable files?
No.
--
Regards,
Per Øyvind
On 01/03/12 07:19, Juan Luis Baptiste wrote:
Ok, I just finished reading all the bug comments. I'll start looking
at this tomorrow (2:20 am here :P).
cheers,
You may also want to read https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787
which although closed is related and was never really resolved.
I have uploaded fatback to svn but would like a review regarding the
license or rather the manual wording re. it's use before submitting.
It is all explained in https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1634
where I have also temporarily linked to copies of the rpms which are
very small.
It's
On Friday 02 March 2012 02:08, Barry Jackson wrote:
I have uploaded fatback to svn but would like a review regarding the
license or rather the manual wording re. it's use before submitting.
I did a grep -i license and found that everywhere where the GPL is mentioned,
which is 5 files and the
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:24:02 +0100
Johnny A. Solbu coo...@solbu.net wrote:
I have uploaded fatback to svn but would like a review regarding
the license or rather the manual wording re. it's use before
submitting.
I did a grep -i license and found that everywhere where the GPL is
On Friday 02 March 2012 06:52, Charles A Edwards wrote:
Did you look at COPYING?
I did, yes.
As a header above the GPLv2 license:
And in the AUTHORS file it is written that the rest of the program is written
by Nicholas Harbour of the DoD (Department of Defence) Computer Forensics Lab.
E.G.
Hello,
Is there any problem with i586 tainted repository? The build of ffmpeg
and gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad has been stalled for hours.
Thanks.
30 matches
Mail list logo