Le 24/08/2012 10:12, Shlomi Fish a écrit :
How do you propose to resolve all that?
By calling /usr/bin/perl directly...
What? I don't understand. Do you mean that the Perl programs should have
#!/usr/bin/perl as their sha-bang? (Which will require either
postprocessing them or tweaking their
On 24 August 2012 10:20, Guillaume Rousse guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you propose to resolve all that?
By calling /usr/bin/perl directly...
What? I don't understand. Do you mean that the Perl programs should have
#!/usr/bin/perl as their sha-bang? (Which will require either
On 24 August 2012 11:11, Guillaume Rousse guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
By calling /usr/bin/perl directly...
What? I don't understand. Do you mean that the Perl programs should have
#!/usr/bin/perl as their sha-bang? (Which will require either
postprocessing them or tweaking their
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Guillaume Rousse
guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 24/08/2012 11:21, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 24 August 2012 11:11, Guillaume Rousse guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
By calling /usr/bin/perl directly...
What? I don't understand. Do you mean that the Perl
On 24 August 2012 11:28, Guillaume Rousse guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
By calling /usr/bin/perl directly...
What? I don't understand. Do you mean that the Perl programs should
have
#!/usr/bin/perl as their sha-bang? (Which will require either
postprocessing them or tweaking their
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Olivier Blin mag...@blino.org wrote:
Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Olivier Blin mag...@blino.org wrote:
Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie writes:
jonund was seeing plenty urpmi segv's today...
Yep, there is
在 Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:48:54 +0800, Kira elegant.pega...@gmail.com寫道:
在 Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:35:32 +0800, Thierry Vignaud
thierry.vign...@gmail.com寫道:
telling what is your graphic card, if you're using proprietary driver
or not,
providin /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old ... could help
I had tried
Le 24/08/2012 16:43, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Guillaume Rousse at 23/08/12 20:01 did gyre and gimble:
Le 20/08/2012 20:49, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Unless someone step it to fix pending issues, those packages should
better get dropped.
I just removed madwifi-sources,
I think removing mod python and ruby is an error
Enviado desde mi DROID 4G LTE de Verizon Wireless
Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie escribió:
'Twas brillig, and Guillaume Rousse at 23/08/12 20:01 did gyre and gimble:
Le 20/08/2012 20:49, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Unless someone step it to
Guillaume Rousse guillomovi...@gmail.com writes:
Le 24/08/2012 16:43, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Guillaume Rousse at 23/08/12 20:01 did gyre and gimble:
Le 20/08/2012 20:49, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Unless someone step it to fix pending issues, those packages should
better
EatDirt dirteat@... writes:
I am actually using torque at work (but from centos...), so I can give
it a try; unless someone has a peculiar interest in doing it instead.
Good to hear :o) Please have a look at this when you do:
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6082
Le 24/08/2012 16:58, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
I think removing mod python and ruby is an error
Well, that's a bit late... However, feel free to resurect them from the
subversion repository, if you're ready to take maintainership of course.
--
BOFH excuse #341:
HTTPD Error 666 :
Le 24/08/2012 17:04, Olivier Blin a écrit :
Agreed. Hence the point of writing the procedure somewhere.
You mean like already done here? :)
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Packaging_guidelines#Obsoleting_a_package
Ah, great. Excepted that I disagree with the 'thou shall force users to
remove the
So torque-2.5.12-1mga3 landed; please open bug reports if it doesn't
work for you.
Cheers,
Chris.
EatDirt skrev 23.8.2012 19:14:
Hi,
torque package is not maintained by anyone. The version we have on
mageia is 2.5.3 which is *very* old. Torque comes in various branches,
the version 2 is now at 2.5.12 wheras the last version is 4.1.0
The spec file is an old monster from mandriva that would
the obvious question
Do we really need 2 branches of torque ?
Why not simply say bye-bye to 2.* series ?
--
Thomas
Agreed! I was just avoiding to do a big jump as 2.5.x is still
maintained upstream, but ultimately that could be the plan.
As we have some bugs on the current 2.5.3
On Saturday 25 August 2012 02:33, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
For me obsolete should be reserved for replacements or rename, nothing
more.
I agree on this.
--
Johnny A. Solbu
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
17 matches
Mail list logo
