> BuildRequires: %{_lib}jpeg62
Thanks! It worked pretty well. I've reverted libjpeg, please push it
(right now it has bogus Provides: due to a typo).
Thanks! Mitya
05.05.2012 21:46, Dimitri skrev:
You are right guys... my bad. But shouldn't lib[64]jpeg62 provide some
platform-agnostic token so it can be Requires:'d in a portable way? How
about "jpeg62"? Right now I have the following in racket.spec:
%ifarch x86_64
BuildRequires: lib64jpeg62
%else
BuildReq
You are right guys... my bad. But shouldn't lib[64]jpeg62 provide some
platform-agnostic token so it can be Requires:'d in a portable way? How
about "jpeg62"? Right now I have the following in racket.spec:
%ifarch x86_64
BuildRequires: lib64jpeg62
%else
BuildRequires: libjpeg62
%endif
Looks pre
'Twas brillig, and Anssi Hannula at 05/05/12 14:55 did gyre and gimble:
> 05.05.2012 16:35, Dimitri kirjoitti:
>> Please push libjpeg. The updated version fixes Provides: libjpeg62 for
>> both 32- and 64-bit platforms. It's important because now it's
>> impossible to require libjpeg62 on a 64-bit p
05.05.2012 16:35, Dimitri kirjoitti:
> Please push libjpeg. The updated version fixes Provides: libjpeg62 for
> both 32- and 64-bit platforms. It's important because now it's
> impossible to require libjpeg62 on a 64-bit platform, one has to require
> lib64jpeg62 instead.
Isn't that provide altoge
Please push libjpeg. The updated version fixes Provides: libjpeg62 for
both 32- and 64-bit platforms. It's important because now it's
impossible to require libjpeg62 on a 64-bit platform, one has to require
lib64jpeg62 instead.
Thanks! Mitya
