Le 05/04/2013 02:54, FundaWang a écrit :
Hello,
Could postgresql-(8.4,9.0,9.1,9.2) be pushed to fix several security
Vulnerabilities?
CVE-2013-1899, CVE-2013-1900, CVE-2013-1901
Done.
--
BOFH excuse #157:
Incorrect time synchronization
Hello,
Could postgresql-(8.4,9.0,9.1,9.2) be pushed to fix several security
Vulnerabilities?
CVE-2013-1899, CVE-2013-1900, CVE-2013-1901
Regards.
Hello,
Could postgresql(8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2) be pushed? They fixes a denial-of-service
(DOS) vulnerability (CVE-2013-0255).
Regards.
[1]: http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1446/
Hello,
Could newer version of postgresql-jdbc be pushed? We currently have 9.0 series
of postgresql-jdbc, but it won't build against latest java tool stack.
Considering we are promoting postgresql 9.2 in mga3, same series of jdbcd
driver might be more acceptable.
Regards.
BTW, you may want to
Le 08/02/2013 09:29, FundaWang a écrit :
Hello,
Could postgresql(8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2) be pushed? They fixes a
denial-of-service (DOS) vulnerability (CVE-2013-0255).
Done.
BTW, that's just insane to ship 4 different versions of postgresql.
Unless there is a context with tomcat maintainer for
Le 08/02/2013 09:44, FundaWang a écrit :
Hello,
Could newer version of postgresql-jdbc be pushed? We currently have 9.0
series of postgresql-jdbc, but it won't build against latest java tool stack.
Considering we are promoting postgresql 9.2 in mga3, same series of jdbcd
driver might be