On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:30, Thierry Vignaud
thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 October 2010 00:31, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
While I cannot answer, i think we should indeed try to have a policy for
this.
And in fact, I would also try to remove older Conflicts and Obsoletes
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:41, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is how do we detect old tags???
By commenting when adding an Obsoletes ?
Another a way to do it could be svn annotate *.spec + grep Obsoletes +
look for revision older than a given one
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:43:25AM -0700, Pascal Terjan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:41, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is how do we detect old tags???
By commenting when adding an Obsoletes ?
Another a way to do it could be svn annotate *.spec + grep Obsoletes +
look
Le samedi 16 octobre 2010 à 13:33 +0200, Luca Berra a écrit :
short explanation:
I maintain some package that has multiple spec and initscript hacks to
allow upgrading since 2005LE to current cooker (i.e. postfix). I really
believe it is too far and that some should be pruned.
The question
On 16 October 2010 13:33, Luca Berra bl...@vodka.it wrote:
I maintain some package that has multiple spec and initscript hacks to
allow upgrading since 2005LE to current cooker (i.e. postfix). I really
believe it is too far and that some should be pruned.
The question is, how long should we
