Am 27.08.2011 22:19, schrieb Michael Scherer:
> Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
>> Am 04.03.2011 22:30, schrieb Michael Scherer:
>>>
>>> But we can filter and configure it to be a little more perfect.
>>>
>>> In a rather autocratic fashion, as the maintainer of rpmlin
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
Am 04.03.2011 22:30, schrieb Michael Scherer:
But we can filter and configure it to be a little more perfect.
In a rather autocratic fashion, as the maintainer of rpmlint ( both packages
and uptream ), as
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Florian Hubold wrote:
> Am 27.08.2011 22:19, schrieb Michael Scherer:
>>
>> Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
>>>
>>> What about the following, AFAIK those are deprecated and rpmlint
>>> shouldn't
>>> complain about:
>>>
>>> *files-att
Am 27.08.2011 22:19, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
What about the following, AFAIK those are deprecated and rpmlint shouldn't
complain about:
*files-attr-not-set*as i was told by dmorgan, empty default attributes
(%defattr(-,roo
Am 27.08.2011 22:16, schrieb Guillaume Rousse:
On 27/08/2011 22:06, Florian Hubold wrote:
I think the following are bogus, but i may be totally wrong:
*strange-permission * for SOURCES and SPEC it complains if not 0644, why
is that?
rpmrebuild won't work if you can't read the files included in
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
> Am 04.03.2011 22:30, schrieb Michael Scherer:
> >
> >
> > But we can filter and configure it to be a little more perfect.
> >
> > In a rather autocratic fashion, as the maintainer of rpmlint ( both packages
> > and uptream ), as a pac
On 27/08/2011 22:06, Florian Hubold wrote:
I think the following are bogus, but i may be totally wrong:
*strange-permission * for SOURCES and SPEC it complains if not 0644, why
is that?
rpmrebuild won't work if you can't read the files included in the source
package after extracting them.
*%
Am 04.03.2011 22:30, schrieb Michael Scherer:
But we can filter and configure it to be a little more perfect.
In a rather autocratic fashion, as the maintainer of rpmlint ( both packages
and uptream ), as a packager representative, and as a apprentice dictator
( since there is lots of open pos
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:49:28 +0100, Remy CLOUARD wrote:
Regarding license names, I haven’t checked the code, will provide a
patch for this, it would be nice if rpmlint could load valid license
names from a yaml config file which will contain valid licenses as
mentionned here:
http://fedoraproject
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:30:36PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so as done before on another time and land, I have pushed a rpmlint
> specific
> policy for Mageia, aptly named 'rpmlint-mageia-policy" ( maybe
> rpmlint-policy-mageia would be better, not sure ).
>
> For those that do not
Hi,
so as done before on another time and land, I have pushed a rpmlint
specific
policy for Mageia, aptly named 'rpmlint-mageia-policy" ( maybe
rpmlint-policy-mageia would be better, not sure ).
For those that do not know, rpmlint is a tool to check a rpm against a
list
of rules written in p
11 matches
Mail list logo
