I was wondering if any packager is planning to import and maintain
Seamonkey for Mageia.
If nobody wants to do it I might consider it, but since it's quite a
complex package I'd prefer if someone with more experience than me does
it! :)
--
Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/f
Am 16.04.2011 16:05, schrieb Christiaan Welvaart:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
>
>> I just downloaded the latest Seamonkey 2.0.12 SRPM from Mandriva cooker and
>> rebuilt it on my Mageia VM and it built flawlessly, I only had to remove
>> all the obsolete "%if %mdkversion" sections, but all
Am 07.01.2012 18:36, schrieb Florian Hubold:
> Am 16.04.2011 16:05, schrieb Christiaan Welvaart:
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
>>
>>> I just downloaded the latest Seamonkey 2.0.12 SRPM from Mandriva cooker and
>>> rebuilt it on my Mageia VM and it built flawlessly, I only had to remove
>>> a
Am 12.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Florian Hubold:
> Am 07.01.2012 18:36, schrieb Florian Hubold:
>> Am 16.04.2011 16:05, schrieb Christiaan Welvaart:
>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
>>>
I just downloaded the latest Seamonkey 2.0.12 SRPM from Mandriva cooker and
rebuilt it on my Mageia VM
Tux99 a écrit :
I was wondering if any packager is planning to import and maintain
Seamonkey for Mageia.
If nobody wants to do it I might consider it, but since it's quite a
complex package I'd prefer if someone with more experience than me does
it! :)
It would be nice to see, but I'm still a
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
I was wondering if any packager is planning to import and maintain
Seamonkey for Mageia.
Since I'm moving to mageia plan to maintain all packages I was maintaining
there unless someone else wants to do it. Seamonkey is one of them.
If nobody wants to do it
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>> If nobody wants to do it I might consider it, but since it's quite a
>> complex package I'd prefer if someone with more experience than me does
>> it! :)
>
> Unfortunately the seamonkey name and logos are trademarked and the license
> terms are m
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
If nobody wants to do it I might consider it, but since it's quite a
complex package I'd prefer if someone with more experience than me does
it! :)
Unfortunately the seamonkey name and logos are tradem
Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> >
> >> Unfortunately the seamonkey name and logos are trademarked and the
> licen
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>>
If nobody wants to do it I might consider it, but since it's quite a
complex package I'd prefer if someone with more experience than me doe
Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 à 00:28 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> >>
> If nobody wants to do it I might consider it, but since it's quit
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
>
>
> Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
>
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> > >
> > >> Unfortunately the sea
Quote: nicolas vigier wrote on Fri, 11 March 2011 00:39
> So maybe we need to request permission, as explained in the
> "Modifications" section.
I think you are right and I think it might be rather urgent given that
Firefox is already in on the mirrors and in the alpha1 isos.
--
Mageia ML For
I just downloaded the latest Seamonkey 2.0.12 SRPM from Mandriva cooker and
rebuilt it on my Mageia VM and it built flawlessly, I only had to remove
all the obsolete "%if %mdkversion" sections, but all dependecies are
available in Mageia.
So technically importing Seamonkey into Mageia seems strai
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 00:35, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 à 00:28 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
>> >>> Unfortunately the seamonkey name and logos are trademarked and the
>>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 00:35, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 à 00:28 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
> >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
> >> >>> Unfortunately t
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:51, nicolas vigier wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
>> Wasn''t there a license change regarding the Firefox logo in the end
>> of 2010, that was related to this?
>
> Yes :
> http://glandium.org/blog/?p=933
Right, thanks. But that doesn't solve the t
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
Unfortunately the seamo
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> nicolas vigier a écrit :
> > Also the "do not charge for it" would make it non free (but it does not
> > seem to be mentioned in the "Modifications" section, only in the
> > "Unaltered Binaries" section).
>
> Why would "do not charge for i
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
nicolas vigier a écrit :
Also the "do not charge for it" would make it non free (but it does not
seem to be mentioned in the "Modifications" section, only in the
"Unaltered Binaries" section).
Why would "do n
Romain d'Alverny a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:51, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
Wasn''t there a license change regarding the Firefox logo in the end
of 2010, that was related to this?
Yes :
http://glandium.org/blog/?p=933
Right, thanks. But tha
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 19:25 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> Michael Scherer a écrit :
> >
> > Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> >> nicolas vigier a écrit :
> >
> >>> Also the "do not charge for it" would make it non free (but it does not
> >>> seem to be mentioned in the "Modi
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
> nicolas vigier a écrit :
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
>>>
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
> On
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> > nicolas vigier a écrit :
>
> > > Also the "do not charge for it" would make it non free (but it does not
> > > seem to be mentioned in the "Modifications" section, only in the
> > > "Unaltere
Le vendredi 18 mars 2011 à 01:00 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> > > nicolas vigier a écrit :
> >
> > > > Also the "do not charge for it" would make it non free (but it does not
> > > > s
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 18 mars 2011 à 01:00 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
> > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
> >
> > > Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> > > > nicolas vigier a écrit :
> > >
> > > > > Also the "do not charg
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 19:25 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
nicolas vigier a écrit :
Also the "do not charge for it" would make it non free (but it does not
seem to be mentioned in the
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
> Romain d'Alverny a écrit :
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:51, nicolas vigier wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
Wasn''t there a license change regarding the Firefox logo in the end
of 2010, that was related to this?
>>>
>>> Y
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
>
>> The article of the FSF explicitly list this as a right for free software
>> users http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html .
>
> That is a provision of unmodified GPL, and not a requirement of all open
> source licenses. In fact, even the FSF admits th
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 21:05 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > So I cannot distribute it by selling a CD, since this would subject the
> > distribution to a fee.
>
> Only if the CD contained only (or primarily) Mozilla products would I
> say that you would reason for con
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:00:24 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote about Re:
[Mageia-dev] Seamonkey package:
>No, I think you misinterpret this :
>
>"The author (Panagiotis Tsirigotis) grants permission to use, copy,
>and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Thu,
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
Romain d'Alverny a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:51, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
Wasn''t there a license change regarding the Firefox logo in the end
of 2010, that was related to thi
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
> nicolas vigier a écrit :
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
>>
>>> nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
>
>
> Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
> -
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
I just downloaded the latest Seamonkey 2.0.12 SRPM from Mandriva cooker and
rebuilt it on my Mageia VM and it built flawlessly, I only had to remove
all the obsolete "%if %mdkversion" sections, but all dependecies are
available in Mageia.
So technically importin
To Christiaan Welvaart
You uploaded iceape 2.0.12...
and it obsoleted seamonkey 2.0.13 that ennael had uploaded 2 days
before...
to be more precise :
iceape 2.0.12 replaces seamonkey 2.0.13
iceape-irc replaces seamonkey-irc
iceape-dom replaces seamonkey-dom
iceape-mail replaces seamonkey-mail
i
Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
To Christiaan Welvaart
You uploaded iceape 2.0.12...
and it obsoleted seamonkey 2.0.13 that ennael had uploaded 2 days
before...
to be more precise :
iceape 2.0.12 replaces seamonkey 2.0.13
iceape-irc replaces seamonkey-irc
iceape-dom replaces seamonkey-dom
iceape-mai
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, andre999 wrote:
Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
To Christiaan Welvaart
You uploaded iceape 2.0.12...
and it obsoleted seamonkey 2.0.13 that ennael had uploaded 2 days
before...
Firefox and Thunderbird can be installed at the same time as
Seamonkey without problem.
As well, m
>We're not going to have the same application twice with different names in
>mageia. The obsoletes/provides are needed to allow upgrades from mandriva
>linux 2010.1 .
The problem remains for seamonkey-enigmail-2.0.13 and
seamonkey-enigmime-2.0.13
They are in the mageia repo because it seems th
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Philippe DIDIER wrote:
We're not going to have the same application twice with different names in
mageia. The obsoletes/provides are needed to allow upgrades from mandriva
linux 2010.1 .
The problem remains for seamonkey-enigmail-2.0.13 and
seamonkey-enigmime-2.0.13
The
41 matches
Mail list logo
