Le 02/03/2012 22:01, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit :
Den 21:51 2. mars 2012 skrev Maarten Vanraesal...@rmail.be følgende:
Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 21:29:05 schreef Anssi Hannula:
02.03.2012 21:57, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 15:22:23 schreef Anssi Hannula:
02.03.2012
02.03.2012 00:17, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula:
[...]
does this mean debug info fails for these?
I'm not immediately sure (I never remember how the debug/stripping stuff
works exactly), but I think either a) debug symbols extraction and
Den 23:05 1. mars 2012 skrev Anssi Hannula an...@mageia.org følgende:
02.03.2012 00:03, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:54:59 schreef Anssi Hannula:
01.03.2012 23:36, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
02.03.2012 21:57, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 15:22:23 schreef Anssi Hannula:
02.03.2012 00:17, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula:
[...]
does this mean debug info fails for these?
I'm not immediately sure (I never
Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 21:29:05 schreef Anssi Hannula:
02.03.2012 21:57, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 15:22:23 schreef Anssi Hannula:
02.03.2012 00:17, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula:
[...]
does this mean
Den 21:51 2. mars 2012 skrev Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be følgende:
Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 21:29:05 schreef Anssi Hannula:
02.03.2012 21:57, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 15:22:23 schreef Anssi Hannula:
02.03.2012 00:17, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op donderdag 01
I noticed that on my system, some libraries are marked executable and others
aren't.
I know that certain libraries are executable, like libc, but i figure that this
is rather the exception rather than the rule.
I wonder if we should have some kind of policy about this?
I can be wrong, but i
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:22:37 schreef Maarten Vanraes:
[...]
forgot to add my counts from my system:
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64 -iname *.so -executable | sort |
uniq | wc -l
4113
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64 -iname *.so | sort | uniq | wc -
l
4147
[ ]$
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 21:22, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
I noticed that on my system, some libraries are marked executable and others
aren't.
I know that certain libraries are executable, like libc, but i figure that
this
is rather the exception rather than the rule.
Yes but I
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:36:08 schreef Pascal Terjan:
[...]
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
ok, thanks for your pov
01.03.2012 23:36, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
/usr/lib/rpm/mageia/find-debuginfo.sh:
# Strip ELF binaries
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ! -path ${debugdir}/*.debug -type f \
\( -perm -0100 -or -perm -0010 -or -perm -0001
On 01.03.2012 22:25, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:22:37 schreef Maarten Vanraes:
[...]
forgot to add my counts from my system:
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64 -iname *.so -executable | sort |
uniq | wc -l
4113
[ ]$ find -L /lib /lib64 /usr/lib /usr/lib64
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:54:59 schreef Anssi Hannula:
01.03.2012 23:36, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
/usr/lib/rpm/mageia/find-debuginfo.sh:
# Strip ELF binaries
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ! -path ${debugdir}/*.debug -type f \
02.03.2012 00:03, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 22:54:59 schreef Anssi Hannula:
01.03.2012 23:36, Pascal Terjan kirjoitti:
I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it
/usr/lib/rpm/mageia/find-debuginfo.sh:
# Strip ELF binaries
find
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula:
[...]
does this mean debug info fails for these?
I'm not immediately sure (I never remember how the debug/stripping stuff
works exactly), but I think either a) debug symbols extraction and thus
-debug packaging, b) stripping, or c)
Den 23:17 1. mars 2012 skrev Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be følgende:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula:
[...]
does this mean debug info fails for these?
I'm not immediately sure (I never remember how the debug/stripping stuff
works exactly), but I think either a)
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:37:02 schreef Per Øyvind Karlsen:
[...]
rpmlint already has a check for unstripped files at least.. :)
does it also check only executable files?
Den 23:45 1. mars 2012 skrev Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be følgende:
Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:37:02 schreef Per Øyvind Karlsen:
[...]
rpmlint already has a check for unstripped files at least.. :)
does it also check only executable files?
No.
--
Regards,
Per Øyvind
18 matches
Mail list logo