On 3 August 2012 11:18, Buchan Milne wrote:
>> - obsolete db5.2 in favour of db5.3
>
> Before you push a change like this, you should ensure you aren't going to
> break people's machines and make cauldron uninstallable.
Well, when Funda did, there were only 2 remaining packages build against db-5
On Wednesday, 1 August 2012 05:29:55 fwang wrote:
> fwang 3-21.mga3:
> + Revision: 277136
> - obsolete db5.2 in favour of db5.3
Funda,
Before you push a change like this, you should ensure you aren't going to
break people's machines and make cauldron uninstallable.
Regards,
Buchan
On Wednesday, 1 August 2012 05:29:55 fwang wrote:
> fwang 3-21.mga3:
> + Revision: 277136
> - obsolete db5.2 in favour of db5.3
Funda,
Before you push a change like this, you should ensure you aren't going to
break people's machines and make cauldron uninstallable.
Regards,
Buchan
On 1 August 2012 16:29, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
>> >> Within mageia, libreoffice packages are supposed to replace old
>> >> openoffice packages, so obsoletes are needed.
>> >
>> > Unless they are effective file conflict, and libreoffice can't be installed
>> > simultaneously, I see no actual reason
* Thierry Vignaud (thierry.vign...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 1 August 2012 15:43, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> >> Within mageia, libreoffice packages are supposed to replace old
> >> openoffice packages, so obsoletes are needed.
> >
> > Unless they are effective file conflict, and libreoffice can't be i
On 1 August 2012 15:43, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>> Within mageia, libreoffice packages are supposed to replace old
>> openoffice packages, so obsoletes are needed.
>
> Unless they are effective file conflict, and libreoffice can't be installed
> simultaneously, I see no actual reason to force its
Le 01/08/2012 15:34, Christiaan Welvaart a écrit :
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, andre999 wrote:
This last point reminds me of the obsoletes of openoffice put in the
libreoffice spec, when there was no real conflicts and there were some
differences. So a regression in libreoffice required me to install
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, andre999 wrote:
This last point reminds me of the obsoletes of openoffice put in the
libreoffice spec, when there was no real conflicts and there were some
differences. So a regression in libreoffice required me to install upstream
libreoffice so I could install openoffice
Le 01/08/2012 15:19, Olivier Blin a écrit :
Guillaume Rousse writes:
Morevoer, it's quite ridiculous to focus on removing obsoleted package
from end users machines, without first cleaning our own
infrastructure: db5.2 is still present in the subversion repository,
for instance...
IIRC, the o
Guillaume Rousse writes:
> Morevoer, it's quite ridiculous to focus on removing obsoleted package
> from end users machines, without first cleaning our own
> infrastructure: db5.2 is still present in the subversion repository,
> for instance...
IIRC, the obsoleted package are supposed to be remo
Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Le 01/08/2012 09:31, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Le 01/08/2012 08:46, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 1 August 2012 05:29, fwang wrote:
fwang 3-21.mga3:
+ Revision: 277136
- obsolete db5.2 in favour of db5.3
# urpmi --auto-select --keep -vv --debug
(...)
installed li
Le 01/08/2012 09:31, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Le 01/08/2012 08:46, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 1 August 2012 05:29, fwang wrote:
fwang 3-21.mga3:
+ Revision: 277136
- obsolete db5.2 in favour of db5.3
# urpmi --auto-select --keep -vv --debug
(...)
installed libreoffice-core-3.6.0.1-1.mga
Le 01/08/2012 08:46, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 1 August 2012 05:29, fwang wrote:
fwang 3-21.mga3:
+ Revision: 277136
- obsolete db5.2 in favour of db5.3
# urpmi --auto-select --keep -vv --debug
(...)
installed libreoffice-core-3.6.0.1-1.mga3.x86_64 is conflicting
because of unsatisfied li
On 1 August 2012 05:29, fwang wrote:
> fwang 3-21.mga3:
> + Revision: 277136
> - obsolete db5.2 in favour of db5.3
# urpmi --auto-select --keep -vv --debug
(...)
installed libreoffice-core-3.6.0.1-1.mga3.x86_64 is conflicting
because of unsatisfied libdb-5.2.so()(64bit)
unselecting task-obsolete
14 matches
Mail list logo
