Op maandag 31 oktober 2011 22:14:06 schreef Claire Robinson:
[...]
Can I just mention bug 2317 and run away!
Nice to bring it back on topic :-)
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I certainly don't expect a package maintained by a team to be marked as
nobody (well, certainly not longer term). But again, I think even
allocating a gatekeeper or a team leader puts too many social pressures
on that
Op dinsdag 01 november 2011 00:32:38 schreef Michael Scherer:
[... stuff ...]
So this mean it's preferred, that for example:
- I grab mysql and httpd
- I do as i see fit
- contributions to httpd (which happen), will have to ask me before doing it.
- since i only wanted to help, i may do a bad job
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011, andre999 wrote:
I like that idea, at least as a supplement to multiple maintainers ...
there are a lot of packages where I could help solve problems, but wouldn't
want to be a maintainer. I'm sure this applies to many others.
You can already help solve problems on any
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op dinsdag 01 november 2011 00:32:38 schreef Michael Scherer:
[... stuff ...]
So this mean it's preferred, that for example:
- I grab mysql and httpd
- I do as i see fit
- contributions to httpd (which happen), will have to ask me before doing
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011, andre999 wrote:
I like that idea, at least as a supplement to multiple maintainers ...
there are a lot of packages where I could help solve problems, but wouldn't
want to be a maintainer. I'm sure this applies to many others.
You can
Am 01.11.2011 11:45, schrieb andre999:
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011, andre999 wrote:
I like that idea, at least as a supplement to multiple maintainers ...
there are a lot of packages where I could help solve problems, but wouldn't
want to be a maintainer. I'm sure this
Am 31.10.2011 13:16, schrieb Manuel Hiebel:
2841;gutenprint
1481, 2184, 1454, 2404, 2738;system-config-printer
2834;task-printing-scanning
I'll try to take a look into those. If someone knows python and would
be available for help with s-c-p that would be quite helpful.
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 06:56, David W. Hodgins wrote:
Merging /usr into / would require a large amount of work,
In my oppinion, that single change would be the most stupid change in an
operating system ever performed.
--
Johnny A. Solbu
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
signature.asc
Description:
Am 16.10.2011 16:15, schrieb Florian Hubold:
Hello guys,
as i'm writing this, hplip-3.11.10 should be available for cauldron.
I've removed some of the Fedora patches after checking back with Tim Waugh
and Jiří Popelka, both Fedora hplip maintainers. The patches were used for:
On Monday 31 October 2011 18:17, Michael Scherer wrote:
So why merge / and /usr and kill a usable feature?
What is the usable feature ?
I can ask you the same thing: What is the usable feature of merging the two?
What benefit do I get as a result?
One reson to have a separate /usr is
在 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:49:20 +0800, Florian Hubold
doktor5...@arcor.de寫道:
Ping?
Nobody with a cauldron install interested in proper HP support?
Otherwise i'll assume everything works properly and there are
no problems with this.
No problem encountered here.
Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 12:54 +0100, Johnny A. Solbu a écrit :
On Monday 31 October 2011 18:17, Michael Scherer wrote:
So why merge / and /usr and kill a usable feature?
What is the usable feature ?
I can ask you the same thing: What is the usable feature of merging the two?
What
Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 01:56 -0400, David W. Hodgins a écrit :
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:17:15 -0400, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
What is the usable feature ?
To be able to put some kind of quota on /usr ?
To be able to use a different fs for / and /usr ?
I once ran into the
2011/11/1 Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org:
Name : kdenlive Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.8.2 Vendor: Mageia.Org
[...]
- new version 0.8.2
Juancho maybe we should push it also on updates because according to
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 13:24, Michael Scherer wrote:
I suggest to re-read the other mails of the thread, especially the one
where I give this url :
http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg158642.html
I have read the entire thread on the Fedora list, every message, including that
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011, Johnny A. Solbu wrote:
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 13:24, Michael Scherer wrote:
I suggest to re-read the other mails of the thread, especially the one
where I give this url :
http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg158642.html
I have read the entire thread on
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 13:24, Michael Scherer wrote:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg158642.html
I have one nitpick with point A on that list. :-)=
The developer does not have to consider wether or not to put something in bin
and not sbin. In my experience it's the other way
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 06:25:38PM +0100, Johnny A. Solbu wrote:
I'm sorry if someone feel trampled upon, but when I see something
which I really do think is stupid and idiotic, I reserve the right to
say so. If someone can't handle that, tough luck!
I prefer a constructive way of discussing
'Twas brillig, and Johnny A. Solbu at 01/11/11 17:25 did gyre and gimble:
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 13:24, Michael Scherer wrote:
I suggest to re-read the other mails of the thread, especially the
one where I give this url :
http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg158642.html
I have
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 18:39, Olav Vitters wrote:
Lastly, it seems that you think saying stupid and idiotic is acceptable
In some circumstances, yes I do.
However calling someone an idiot, stupid or the like, is Not acceptable. I do
not do that. Nor did I do that in this thread. If you
Johnny A. Solbu a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 13:24, Michael Scherer wrote:
I suggest to re-read the other mails of the thread, especially the one
where I give this url :
http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg158642.html
I have read the entire thread on the Fedora
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Thierry Vignaud
thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 October 2011 17:11, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
takashi takashi 0.714.0-1.mga2:
+ Revision: 158214
- update to 0.714
A requested package cannot be installed:
23 matches
Mail list logo
