Op zondag 16 januari 2011 01:19:29 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
Hi all!
Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
Not having it will
In data domenica 16 gennaio 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula ha scritto:
Hi all!
Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any
%if %mdkversion x to fail
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 11:26:54, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
In data domenica 16 gennaio 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula ha scritto:
Hi all!
Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
Not having
Hi,
I though that I can find more time to work on this week end, but
unfortunately it was not the case.
The Mandriva doc is really not a good starter
(http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Python_packaging_policy)
so I propose to use the Fedora one
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python) with
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:10:08PM +0100, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op zaterdag 15 januari 2011 14:01:51 schreef John Balcaen:
[...]
Regarding the spec we've got at least a major difference in our kde's spec
For example not all the %define are localized at the top of the
spec,especially
Hi,
'Twas brillig, and Sascha Schneider at 21/12/10 21:06 did gyre and gimble:
Wiki updated http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=soundstudio
Sorry I've been a little quiet of late. Email backlog + work commitments
+ $EXCUSE.
I've added a comment to the wiki page about the suggestion of
The idea with the sound-profile really sounds good, didn't knew about that.
Regards, sascha
2011/1/16 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
Hi,
'Twas brillig, and Sascha Schneider at 21/12/10 21:06 did gyre and gimble:
Wiki updated http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=soundstudio
Sorry
Hi,
I am supposed to be the maintainers of this software, required by base
of the system:
perl-MDV-Distribconf-4.02-1mdv2010.1.src.rpm
perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-5mdv2010.1.src.rpm
Should we remove the 'MDV' part ?
Notice changing this is not only about the rpm itself, MDV is part of
the
On 1/16/11, Olivier Thauvin nanar...@nanardon.zarb.org wrote:
So I am favor to import it with this name (we didn't rename RPM because
it mean RedHat Package Manager...).
At the risk of being called pedantic, RPM _now_ stands for RPM
Package Manager in all its GNU recursive acronym goodness
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 04:07:56 pm Anssi Hannula wrote:
Hi all!
Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any
%if %mdkversion x to fail to
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 04:07:56 pm Anssi Hannula wrote:
Hi all!
Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
Not having
11 matches
Mail list logo