FYI:
Originele bericht
Onderwerp: [Mageia-discuss] Fwd: [FOSDEM] Call for stands, devroom
talks and lightning talks
Datum: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:52:57 +0100
Van:Romain d'Alverny r...@mageia.org
Antwoord-naar: Mageia general discussions mageia-disc...@mageia.org
Aan:
On 24.11.2011 00:36, andre999 wrote:
Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
Hello!
As a maintainer of pastebin ( http://raphael.slinckx.net/files/ )my
proposition is to drop it, because:
- it's redundand for betternewermore featured wgetpaste
- it doesn't seem to be updated upstream for years
I can
2011/11/24 Kamil Rytarowski n...@gmx.com
On 24.11.2011 00:36, andre999 wrote:
Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
Hello!
As a maintainer of pastebin (
http://raphael.slinckx.net/**files/http://raphael.slinckx.net/files/)my
proposition is to drop it, because:
- it's redundand for
To Funda :
you modified the spec file of ffmpeg :
disable x264 support as x264 is too old in mageia 1
This may induce a regression (a missing feature)
Why not to update libx264 before updating ffmpeg, and by this way allow
to keep x264 support enabled ?
Is there a problem for other
Yes, new x264 introduces new libmajor, which requires a mass
rebuilding of other packages.
2011/11/24 Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net:
To Funda :
you modified the spec file of ffmpeg :
disable x264 support as x264 is too old in mageia 1
This may induce a regression (a
Funda Wang skrev 24.11.2011 14:26:
Yes, new x264 introduces new libmajor, which requires a mass
rebuilding of other packages.
Then the ffmpeg update must be fixed.
Either only backport the needed fixes,
or fix the build with current x264.
It's not allowed to push updates that
Funda Wang a écrit :
Yes, new x264 introduces new libmajor, which requires a mass
rebuilding of other packages.
2011/11/24 Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net:
To Funda :
you modified the spec file of ffmpeg :
disable x264 support as x264 is too old in mageia 1
This may
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
heavy dilemma ! heavy choice !
- let ffmpeg not updated (with x264 support but with security problem)
The proper thing is to identify the needed fixes and backport them.
- update ffmpeg disabling x264 support
not an option
- update ffmpeg keeping
Funda Wang a écrit :
And, we will rely on current maintainer nobody to take care of this bug.
Don't be angry ... please !!!
I know how much work you do for nobody's packages.
I just pointed a little problem about the dilemma to which you found an
answer that may be discussed and that may
The following package has to be removed for others to be upgraded:
lib64cheese-gtk20-3.3.1-1.mga2.x86_64
(due to missing libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0()(64bit))
There appears to be only one files missing in action (MIA) -
libclutter-glx
Is this intended or should I wait a bit more??
Cheers,
R.Fox
2011/11/24 Robert Fox l...@foxconsult.net:
The following package has to be removed for others to be upgraded:
lib64cheese-gtk20-3.3.1-1.mga2.x86_64
(due to missing libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0()(64bit))
There appears to be only one files missing in action (MIA) -
libclutter-glx
Is this
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
heavy dilemma ! heavy choice !
- let ffmpeg not updated (with x264 support but with security problem)
The proper thing is to identify the needed fixes and backport them.
- update
On 11/11/21 16:22 +0100, Jerome Quelin wrote:
note that i don't understand why some scripts get installed with
/usr/bin/perl5.14.x shebang, while some other are installed with
/usr/bin/perl... maybe if we force -Dinstallusrbinperl in perl spec
file? i need to try that...
and it doesn't seem
Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
Funda Wang a écrit :
And, we will rely on current maintainer nobody to take care of this bug.
Don't be angry ... please !!!
I know how much work you do for nobody's packages.
I just pointed a little problem about the dilemma to which you found an
answer
Hi,
Now a day, when someone wants to install eclipse he has to answer to
less than 17 package selection !
I can anderstand the 2 first (which jvm and javamail vs.
classpathx-mail) but the next 15 are ant-* vs. ant17-* choices.
I was wondering: Is it temporary ?
if not: do we expect that
Le 24/11/2011 21:43, Claire Revillet a écrit :
Hi,
Now a day, when someone wants to install eclipse he has to answer to
less than 17 package selection !
s/to less/not less/
I can anderstand the 2 first (which jvm and javamail vs.
classpathx-mail) but the next 15 are ant-* vs. ant17-*
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 20:58, Dick Gevers dvgev...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:04:56 +0100, Romain d'Alverny wrote about Re:
So please see https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia_2_alpha1 as the canvas
and update as you see fit.
Ping?
Alpha 1 release is in 3 days, and it cannot go
Le jeudi 24 novembre 2011 à 10:49 +0100, Sandro CAZZANIGA a écrit :
Now we need pastebin.mageia.org :)
Well, if you are ready to maintain it, just submit a patch to the puppet
configuration.
--
Michael Scherer
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:53:07 -0500, D.Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
- update ffmpeg keeping x264 support but need to rebuild mass of
packages (not alone ) and provide lots
On 24.11.2011 17:53, D.Morgan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
heavy dilemma ! heavy choice !
- let ffmpeg not updated (with x264 support but with security problem)
The proper thing is to identify the
Hi all...
I have just noticed that GnomeShell is doing strange things wrt windows
decorations. I've had always used the default Adwaita theme, I just
like it. Only changed font sizes.
Chasing another bug (a strange character trailing Mozilla Firefox window
title...)
I tried to change window
2011/11/24 Claire Revillet gren...@zarb.org:
Le 24/11/2011 21:43, Claire Revillet a écrit :
Hi,
Now a day, when someone wants to install eclipse he has to answer to less
than 17 package selection !
s/to less/not less/
I can anderstand the 2 first (which jvm and javamail vs.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Claire Revillet gren...@zarb.org wrote:
Hi,
Now a day, when someone wants to install eclipse he has to answer to less
than 17 package selection !
I can anderstand the 2 first (which jvm and javamail vs. classpathx-mail)
but the next 15 are ant-* vs. ant17-*
Hello,
Currently, we are selecting oxygen as default theme for whole distro,
but oxygen-gtk3 is too unstable, nor seems to be actively maintained.
Maybe we should change default theme for gtk3 applications, the same
as upstream? Especially considering we will providing gtk3 as one
major choice of
I didn't find a marketplace plugin for Mageia, is there one and is it that I
just didn't find it? if no is there one in the works?
Fedora has had one for quite a while.
Michel Catudal
--
For OS/2 and Linux Software visit
http://home.comcast.net/~mcatudal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2011 08:30 PM, D.Morgan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Claire Revillet gren...@zarb.org wrote:
Hi,
Now a day, when someone wants to install eclipse he has to answer to less
than 17 package selection !
I can anderstand the 2
Hi Duane,
I tried to send this via email to you directly, but your overly tight
spamfilter blocked my message and jumping through the hoops it presented
to me didn't work.
It's nice that you sign your posts, but I can't find your public key
online anywhere to check it. Perhaps you can point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2011 09:42 PM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
Hi Duane,
I tried to send this via email to you directly, but your overly tight
spamfilter blocked my message and jumping through the hoops it presented
to me didn't work.
It's nice that you sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:20:46 -0500, Duane Phinney genom...@earthlink.net
wrote:
There is a point: If an email appears on the list from me which has not
been signed its not from me which has happened in the past.
If the public key is not made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2011 10:46 PM, David W. Hodgins wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:20:46 -0500, Duane Phinney
genom...@earthlink.net wrote:
There is a point: If an email appears on the list from me which has not
been signed its not from me which has
hi, it seems that we have a little problem with the last updates of KDE
components...
# urpmi --auto-up
http://twiska.zarb.org/mageia/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/media_info/2025-062623-synthesis.hdlist.cz
média « Core Release » mis à
jour
le média « Core Updates » est à jour
le
31 matches
Mail list logo
