[Mahara-contributors] [Bug 1095890] Re: allowcomments not respected properly

2013-08-19 Thread Aaron Wells
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1171310 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171310 ** Changed in: mahara Milestone: 1.8.0rc1 = None ** Changed in: mahara Assignee: Son Nguyen (ngson2000) = (unassigned) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1171310 Can bypass comment

[Mahara-contributors] [Bug 1095890] Re: allowcomments not respected properly

2013-03-13 Thread Aaron Wells
** Changed in: mahara Status: Invalid = Triaged ** Changed in: mahara Milestone: 1.7.0 = 1.8.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095890 Title: allowcomments not

[Mahara-contributors] [Bug 1095890] Re: allowcomments not respected properly

2013-01-14 Thread Son Nguyen
** Changed in: mahara Assignee: (unassigned) = Son Nguyen (ngson2000) ** Changed in: mahara Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095890

[Mahara-contributors] [Bug 1095890] Re: allowcomments not respected properly

2013-01-14 Thread Son Nguyen
There are two options the function user_comments_allowed() needs to check: allowcomments and approvecomments. if allowcomments of one access right is true, the user can put comments and if approvecomments of one access right is FALSE given the allowcomments is TRUE then the user can publish

[Mahara-contributors] [Bug 1095890] Re: allowcomments not respected properly

2013-01-14 Thread Hugh Davenport
Hi Son, The issue with this is that you can't actually configure the allowcomment flag of any access rights, in the web interface it appears as just a overall view setting. I think either the for loop needs to cover the objectionable access type which doesn't show up anywhere in the access