D'oh!
Thanks!
On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
(I upgraded to 0.19.1 last week.)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll
gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, pending MAHOUT-110, I think we are good to go on the release.
Not sure
who volunteered to upgrade Hadoop, so go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682980#action_12682980
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-110:
--
I say go for it. I will merge with my patch locally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682983#action_12682983
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-110:
Will do. Thanks for the kick in the pants
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved MAHOUT-99.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.1
Committed revision 755548.
Thanks!
Improving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated MAHOUT-111:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 0.2)
0.1
Redirect Test output to file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved MAHOUT-111.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.1
Fixed
Redirect Test output to file
On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Enis Soztutar wrote:
-Grant
Knowing nothing about the mahout build script(s), I think that
having both ant and maven scripts might prove to be problematic.
However keeping one module(taste) in ant will work. As a side note,
we have discussed this same thing
http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/03/12/speeding-up-k-means-clustering-algebra-sparse-vectors/
-Grant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved MAHOUT-110.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed
Ant script for building Taste web app
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Enis Soztutar wrote:
-Grant
Knowing nothing about the mahout build script(s), I think that having
both ant and maven scripts might prove to be problematic. However
keeping one module(taste) in ant will work. As a side note, we have
Hey Jeff,
Is it appropriate to have a Job example like we do for k-means and
some of the other clustering algorithms for dirichlet? I see you do
have some type of UI in there, right?Are there directions
somewhere for running the example?
Interesting optimization. We can incorporate it by adding a centroid^2
argument to DistanceMeasure interface and adjusting the affected
clustering algorithms. All would benefit from this optimization. I will
build a test to assess its impact and report.
Jeff
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Did you reopen this issue because of this error? I just ran the example
and it ran without error.
Jeff
Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reopened MAHOUT-99:
Not only appropriate but essential. I will add a README file in the code
and instructions in the wiki today.
Jeff
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hey Jeff,
Is it appropriate to have a Job example like we do for k-means and
some of the other clustering algorithms for dirichlet? I see you do
have
Yeah, I was wondering about that simple, but nice cluster-showing UI...
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:01:28 PM
I'm running the example in Eclipse using the stand-alone mode in the
hadoop-0.19.1 jar file. It works fine, as does the hadoop compile in
Eclipse. I cannot; however, get any hadoop stuff to work from the
command line. Even though my JAVA_HOME environment is set to
/Library/Java/Home and java
Hi,
Am I the only person getting the following after mvn package?
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Failed to create assembly: Error creating
On my Mac, I have:
$ echo $JAVA_HOME
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6/Home
-Grant
On Mar 18, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
I'm running the example in Eclipse using the stand-alone mode in the
hadoop-0.19.1 jar file. It works fine, as does the hadoop compile in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683140#action_12683140
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
I seem to recall hitting something similar
Yes, at the top. Bad?
Doing it from core worked.
How come it doesn't work from root and should it, at least for 0.2? WOuld be
more intuitive, no?
Otis
- Original Message
From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Hi,
Is there a way to get a collection of neighbours for a given user? I'm
referring to the same neighbour collection that recommendations are derived
from. I didn't see a way, so I simply made NearestNUserNeighborhood.Estimator
public (diff below), so I could do something like this:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683170#action_12683170
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-103:
--
1. How do you feel about, therefore, changing to use
How about the method UserBasedRecommender.mostSimilarUsers()? or a bit
more directly, UserNeighborhood.getUserNeighborhood()? (They are
arguably kind of redundant but it's 'for historical reasons' and low
on my list of design sins.) These in turn largely use
TopItems.getTopUsers() and you
Took me ~15 minutes the first time, 5 minutes subsequent times. Yeah
it still seems long, and does seem like something is amiss, but if it
works it seems OK for now.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Jeff Eastman
j...@windwardsolutions.com wrote:
[WARNING] Entry:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683232#action_12683232
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-103:
1. How do you feel about, therefore, changing to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683238#action_12683238
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-103:
--
The comparison would be to Item. You could say that's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683251#action_12683251
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-103:
--
The comparison would be to Item. You could say that's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-59?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683254#action_12683254
]
Richard Tomsett commented on MAHOUT-59:
---
Ugh, I had an example almost done but managed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683297#action_12683297
]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
Yup. That must be the issue. But I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683312#action_12683312
]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
I have used KeyValueLineRecordReader
The Synthetic Control kMeans job calls the Canopy job to build its
initial clusters as is commonly done. If the kMeans record format was
changed and the Canopy not changed accordingly, then everything would
still compile but there would be a mismatch when the kMeans mapper tried
to read in the
Yeah. But, I am wondering how the testcases succeeded? I ran them using mvn
clean install command.
Thanks
Pallavi
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Eastman [mailto:j...@windwardsolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:56 AM
To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira]
Sure, why don't you go ahead and post a patch?
Pallavi Palleti (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683312#action_12683312 ]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
It depends on the kind of output. If we are just outputting only some numeric
values then it is preferred to have SequenceFile as the data is written as
binary. If not, it is preferred to write as simple text. Text file is readable
where as binary is not readable.
As we consider the data as
34 matches
Mail list logo
