I'm ready to patch this issue, but I went the other way -- fixed the
output to use Locale.ENGLISH.
Either way works, what's preferred to you guys? Is it making the
output deterministic, or locale-friendly? I opted for fixing it to
Locale.ENGLISH because I like not depending on the platform, and
Weak, surely my changes that did it but I don't know why I didn't see
this in a local build / test.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org wrote:
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mahout%20Trunk/584/changes
Changes:
[srowen]
Running org.apache.mahout.cf.taste.hadoop.similarity.item.ItemSimilarityTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.039
sec FAILURE!
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Sean Owen sro...@gmail.com wrote:
Weak, surely my changes that did it but I don't know why I didn't
I see all tests pass in a full clean / test. :( I will look at
Hudson's output to see why it think it failed.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Robin Anil robin.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tasted this before, That was when I didn't do a clean install before
checking in.
I can't reproduce this at all and don't see how to get details out of
Hudson. Does anyone know where it sticks test output? or can anyone
repro this?
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Sean Owen sro...@gmail.com wrote:
I see all tests pass in a full clean / test. :( I will look at
Hudson's output
That must be it. I had removed the '/' earlier since on OS X the temp
dir path ends with '/', and at the time I believed it was the cause of
some other failures (which I'm guessing I was wrong about). I can
easily make the logic account for both cases.
Sean
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:24 AM,
Hi Sean,
I think I saw another potential problem, lines 233 to 237 should be
changed from
if (tmpDir.exists()) {
recursiveDelete(tmpDir);
} else {
tmpDir.mkdirs();
}
to
if (tmpDir.exists()) {
recursiveDelete(tmpDir);
}
tmpDir.mkdirs();
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853919#action_12853919
]
Hui Wen Han commented on MAHOUT-358:
I used the latest code test again ,
the final
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853929#action_12853929
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-358:
--
Maybe it also clarifies to say: those valus are *not*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853930#action_12853930
]
Kris Jack commented on MAHOUT-356:
--
No, I haven't set a CLASSPATH var (not intentionally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853977#action_12853977
]
Hui Wen Han commented on MAHOUT-358:
I have no negative ratings.
the pref value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853983#action_12853983
]
Hui Wen Han commented on MAHOUT-358:
I will debug and tell you the result .
Thanks :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854073#action_12854073
]
Hui Wen Han commented on MAHOUT-358:
if use Text as the out format ,everything is ok.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854077#action_12854077
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-358:
--
You mean that you do not see those negative values?
Hearing no other remarks, I will proceed to disconnect and make the
version 1.0-SNAPSHOT, and call a release vote RSN.
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Last question: What's the first version going to be? I propose '1.0'.
0.4 would get mighty
This still lives in Mahout, just has a different version number?
what's the substance of the change in the short-term; I think I missed
that step.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hearing no other remarks, I will proceed to disconnect and make the
Substance:
1: remove collections-codegen and collections from the top-level pom's
module list.
2: change their parents to point to the apache parent.
3: tweak their poms so that the release plugin works right with them.
4: release them
5: change rest of mahout to consume release.
On Tue, Apr 6,
For what it is worth, I actually prefer this approach to the multi-pom
approach in many cases. If it really is a separate thing, it might as well
have a separate release schedule and artifact. If it isn't a separate
thing, then you might as well use a single pom. This heuristic doesn't
always
I agree in principal, but having a whole different set of versionings seems
kinda... messy? If m-collections goes 1.0, and then 1.1, and then m-math
goes 1.0, and core goes to 0.5, we have a whole pile of different version
numbers to keep track of.
Didn't Lucene and Solr just intentionally do
The Lucene/Solr community have decided to loosely couple release schedules
and explicitly decided to not lock version numbers. One of their arguments
was that it would confuse users, which doesn't apply for us. The other
argument was that either side should be free to have a release that was
I should have said there should SOON be a vanishingly small number of
collections releases. Clearly that isn't so just yet.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
if only because there should be a vanishingly small number of collections
releases
We gain the ability to release collections more frequently. *because*
it is less mature, it needs that.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree in principal, but having a whole different set of versionings seems
kinda... messy? If m-collections goes
Where are we on the consensus process?
Jake, have Ted and I satisfied you? Does this call for a VOTE to be
sure that we're on the same page?
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Very cool. Very exciting.
Benson, that sounds like consensus to me.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'm in favor, I guess, of:
1: remove collections-codegen and collections from the top-level pom's
module list.
2: change their parents to point
Indeed. Off I go.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool. Very exciting.
Benson, that sounds like consensus to me.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'm in favor, I guess, of:
1: remove
Great proposal. Hopefully this will push Mahout core to have faster releases
Robin
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
+1. Release early, release often.
-Grant
On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Indeed. Off I go.
On Tue, Apr
In order to decouple the mahout-collections library from the rest of
Mahout, to allow more frequent releases and other good things, we
propose to release the code generator for the collections library as a
separate Maven artifact. (Followed, in short order, by the collections
library proper.) This
[GSOC] Proposal to implement Neural Network with backpropagation learning on
Hadoop
---
Key: MAHOUT-364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-364
Project:
Here is a good project wish list, If anyone wishes to take it forward I
would be willing to help mentor.
http://www.graphviz.org/
Check out one of the graphs which i believe is a good way to represent
clusters. Creating this graph is as easy was writing cluster output to the
graphviz format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zaid Md. Abdul Wahab Sheikh updated MAHOUT-364:
---
Description:
Proposal Title: Implement Multi-Layer Perceptrons with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zaid Md. Abdul Wahab Sheikh updated MAHOUT-364:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: formatting :()
[GSOC] Proposal to
Is that possible here instead:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/mahout/?
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
In order to decouple the mahout-collections library from the rest of
Mahout, to allow more frequent
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that possible here instead:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/mahout/?
No, that's not right. That path has our last (0.3) release in it.
However, I had forgotten to close it.
I just submitted a proposal to implement Neural Network with
backpropagation learning
Jira issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-364
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Robin Anil robin.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having a tough time separating Mahout proposals from rest of Apache on
Hi all,
I just submitted a GSoC proposal for implementing Neural Network with
backpropagation on Hadoop.
Jira issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-364
I would appreciate your feedback and comments on the proposal and on
the working or implementation plan.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854304#action_12854304
]
Jake Mannix commented on MAHOUT-364:
I've got to say, this is a fantastically well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854317#action_12854317
]
Hui Wen Han commented on MAHOUT-358:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854349#action_12854349
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-364:
This is a very nicely written proposal.
One
I confirm that the components exist and appear in good order.
Is there a way for me to test this component? Is there any testing needed
beyond checking existence?
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Ted Dunning
Is there a patch which pulls this dependency to build Mahout. Thats the good
test for it
Robin
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I confirm that the components exist and appear in good order.
Is there a way for me to test this component? Is there any
40 matches
Mail list logo
