At 03:14 PM 10/15/01 -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>Make it so list moderators can set or unset the per-user moderate
> bit (right now only list admins can do that).
Generically, there's a lot of things that should be done with list
moderators...
Really, I think we need to redesign large chun
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> There were two patches sent here, by Ben Gertzfield and Mark Tearle.
>
> Was one of the two integrated in mailman CVS?
>
> If not, any recommendations on which one I should look at today and Barry,
> if you're reading, whether you're planning to put one i
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:14:13 -0400
Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, each member has a "moderate" bit associated with their
> options. If their bit is on, their postings are held for
> moderation regardless of any other setting. If their bit is off,
> then the message is pass
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:16:17 -0400
Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "JCL" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JCL> Aye, I'd like it as well. What's really needed is a
JCL> per-subscriber config option which is controllable only by the
JCL> ListOwner (there are good argu
> "JCL" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JCL> Aye, I'd like it as well. What's really needed is a
JCL> per-subscriber config option which is controllable only by
JCL> the ListOwner (there are good arguments for it being both
JCL> invisible and visible to members)
I'm about to checkin a bunch of changes implementing new
sender-centric moderation rules. I think this will make moderation
based on sender (i.e. From:) more flexible and more understandable.
One of the things that I dislike intensely, and I often get negative
email about is the overloading of
Just to let you know that we solved the problem below.
Turns out it was to do with rlimits causing problems with Apache.
All is good now though.
:)
Donal
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 23:51:57 -0400
>To: Donal Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>S
Hi Barry and co.
We at sindominio.net are running several mailing lists with GNU Mailman.
One of our lists gets quite a lot of spam. Last week, we had 22 messages
pending for approval. When we tried to approve/reject/discard them, we got a
413 error message:
Request Entity Too Large
The
