Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>[1] I personally wish Mark would cut his FAQ-answering time by about
>80%; there are plenty of experienced users who can do the job well enough.
Of course you are right, but there is a reason my nickname on the
acknowledgements page is "Mailman's compulsive responder
Brian J Mingus writes:
> I have only recently subscribed to this list and I can say that you
> and every other person that read my e-mail saw fit to ignore
> it.
I don't see anything in my folder or in the archives for this list
(Mailman Developers). Perhaps you are referring to your post
"E-m
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:13:32AM -0200, Gerheim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've terminated to configure my server but when I create a list, the welcome
> message stops on queue.
> Analysing /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure I get:
>
> Oct 29 09:04:29 2009 (18551) delivery to t...@xxx.xxx.xxx failed with code
Joost Schuttelaar wrote:
>When the obscure email address feature in the admin settings is
>enabled, e-mail addresses are transformed into the format 'xxx AT xxx'
>in the archives. This may have worked 5 years ago to prevent spam
>harvesting. But it does not work anymore.
You may be interes
Gerheim wrote:
>
>I've terminated to configure my server but when I create a list, the welcome
>message stops on queue.
>Analysing /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure I get:
>
>Oct 29 09:04:29 2009 (18551) delivery to t...@xxx.xxx.xxx failed with code
>-1: (101, 'Network is unreachable')
>
>Could anyone
Brian J Mingus wrote:
>
>Perhaps the failure of the mailman dev team to attract community
>participation can be related not to any crazy versioning scheme but rather
>to a failure to engage with the community. I have only recently subscribed
>to this list
You are subscribed to mailman-users, not
On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Joost Schuttelaar wrote:
When the obscure email address feature in the admin settings is
enabled, e-mail addresses are transformed into the format 'xxx AT
xxx' in the archives. This may have worked 5 years ago to prevent
spam harvesting. But it does not work any
On Nov 2, 2009, at 3:25 AM, Kaja P. Christiansen wrote:
A field for an address for redirection of spam and a 'Redirect'
button would make a big difference for list administrators!
I really want imap access for admindb functionality. ;)
-Barry
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Brian J Mingus wrote:
Perhaps the failure of the mailman dev team to attract community
participation can be related not to any crazy versioning scheme but
rather
to a failure to engage with the community. I have only recently
subscribed
to this list and I can say
When the obscure email address feature in the admin settings is
enabled, e-mail addresses are transformed into the format 'xxx AT xxx'
in the archives. This may have worked 5 years ago to prevent spam
harvesting. But it does not work anymore.
I've patched (well... butchered) my own install
[This posting was originally sent on Oct 27th
but it seems it didn't make it to the list]
Hello all,
Our MTA provides strong and effective spam filtering
(MIMEdefang with Solido/greylisting/NilSimsa). Part
of the process is redirecting spam which gets through
to our spam filters.
In my role as
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> As you know, Mailman 2.1 has long been in maintenance-only mode. Mailman
> 2.2 was where we were going to add new features and update the user
> interface, without changing the basic model. Mailman 3 was where we were
> going to fix the mode
Hi,
I've terminated to configure my server but when I create a list, the welcome
message stops on queue.
Analysing /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure I get:
Oct 29 09:04:29 2009 (18551) delivery to t...@xxx.xxx.xxx failed with code
-1: (101, 'Network is unreachable')
Could anyone help?
Thanks
Walla
13 matches
Mail list logo
