On Jun 30, 2010, at 05:14 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>Ah, sorry, seems like I was too quick with my merge proposal. Gnn, now I
>have to grok how to supersede it on lp. I'll go and fix it.
Just push an update to your existing branch. I believe LP will rescan your
branch and update the merge pr
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:55:38AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I don't have a problem with including the patch in 2.1, except for the
> Defaults.py.in
>
> ALLOW_SENDER_OVERRIDES = Yes
>
> If it were no, the feature would be entirely transparent to those who
> didn't want it, essentially preservin
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 16:55:38 Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I looked at your patch yesterday. It seems good, but it's missing a
> critical piece. It has to increment DATA_FILE_VERSION in
> Mailman/Version.py. Otherwise, the code in Mailman/versions.py to add
> the include_sender_header attribute to exi
Malte S. Stretzwrote:
>
>Here is a branch for 2.1:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~mss/mailman/2.1-sender-header
>And here for 2.2:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~mss/mailman/2.2-sender-header
>
>Not sure how to proceed from here, shall I try a merge proposal?
I looked at your patch yesterday. It
On Jun 30, 2010, at 04:38 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>On Wednesday 30 June 2010 16:24:07 Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 04:07 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>> >Any chance to have my patch applied to 2.1 (and/or 2.2)? I ask
>> >because I have to take care of some mailing lists on a shared
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 16:24:07 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 04:07 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> >Any chance to have my patch applied to 2.1 (and/or 2.2)? I ask
> >because I have to take care of some mailing lists on a shared server
> >and I doubt that the admin will upgrade to 3.0
On Jun 30, 2010, at 04:07 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>Cool. I set the status of bug 266824 to Fix Committed.
Thanks. I've targeted that to 3.0a6.
>Any chance to have my patch applied to 2.1 (and/or 2.2)? I ask because I
>have to take care of some mailing lists on a shared server and I doubt
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 04:15:46 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 06:19 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >On 6/29/2010 6:15 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >> It may just be time to ditch the Sender rewriting in Mailman 3. I
> >> don't think a reading of RFC 5322 can justify it, and I'm pretty
> >> s
