Hi,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:48:34AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Abhilash Raj writes:
> >
> > This is a list of topics that probably needs to be discussed in detail
> > again. I tried to mention in breif about the discussions in past
> > personally with a someone or on mm-dev list.
Joost van Baal-Ilić writes:
> Indeed, that could work. Another way to deal with it could be: "a
> key is considered valid if it is imported in the trusted keyring of
> the current list". And declare deciding wether to import out of
> the scope of the project.
I think that we necessarily hav
Hi,
You have provided me with EXACTLY the information that I requested.
To operate in this mode, I recommend the following:
1) Read enough about Vagrant to be able to "freeze" an image of the VM and use
that as a base for your actual work.
That way, you can work through the initial setup of your
On Jun 16, 2013, at 03:42 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Barry Warsaw writes:
>
> > I know this is a little backwards, but it's probably the best match
> > for the current rule/chain model.
>
>I have a smallish problem with this model. Specifically, for a list
>with a maximum size, I think it's
On 06/15/2013 02:45 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Abhilash Raj wrote:
>
>> * Inline pgp should be supported or not?
>
> Probably not as a first step. PGP/MIME will be easier to support so do that
> first. As Stephen suggests, a survey of popular MUAs might be useful
On 06/15/2013 11:42 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> Barry Warsaw writes:
>
> > I know this is a little backwards, but it's probably the best match
> > for the current rule/chain model.
>
> I have a smallish problem with this model. Specifically, for a list
> with a maximum size, I think it
On Jun 15, 2013, at 09:09 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
>It's been a couple of months or so since my last update, and I finally got
>round to doing some more work on the content migration from Confluence to
>MoinMoin.
>
>As always, the results can be found here:
>
>http://mmwiki.boddie.org.uk/
It's lo
Barry Warsaw writes:
> It's a valid complaint. What I've suggested in the past is that a
> rule can do some *nondestructive* processing of a message before it
> makes its decision. The rule would either throw out the results of
> the processing (possibly leading to duplication of work) or wo
On Sunday 16 June 2013 17:43:48 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 09:09 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> >
> >http://mmwiki.boddie.org.uk/
>
> It's looking great Paul. I really appreciate your continued efforts here.
> I'd like to hear especially from Mark and the other top wiki editors what
> the
