Re: [Mailman-Developers] GitLab/development tools integration project

2016-03-13 Thread Abhilash Raj
Hi Niko, On 03/13/2016 04:19 AM, Niko 7 wrote: > > > > Greetings, > I'm a student from University of Oviedo, Spain, and I was interested in > working with aforementioned project. I have decent experience in Python and > I've already prepared my environment (forked and cloned the core and the

[Mailman-Developers] TLS/SMTP AUTH in MM3? [was: Mailman without localhost ?]

2016-03-13 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Redirected from -users. I have nothing to add to what Mark wrote there. Mark Sapiro writes: > These are for outgoing mail from Mailman only. They have nothing to do > with delivery of mail TO mailman. You can tell Mailman to connect to any > SMTP server and port by setting SMTPHOST to the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Basic workflow of the ARC implementation

2016-03-13 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Aditya Divekar writes: > Yes, in that case the arc verification would need to be postponed to after > the entire code for the header generation has been written. I'll need to > rethink the milestones a bit, since this testing part would have to be > added at the end, and things will change

[Mailman-Developers] GitLab/development tools integration project

2016-03-13 Thread Niko 7
Greetings, I'm a student from University of Oviedo, Spain, and I was interested in working with aforementioned project. I have decent experience in Python and I've already prepared my environment (forked and cloned the core and the client) and I'm going to look into helping with issues soon

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Basic workflow of the ARC implementation

2016-03-13 Thread Aditya Divekar
Hi Steve, > The problem is how do you get such a message? The easiest way is if > you have implemented the creation functions for the ARC-* fields. > > Then you can check that you can roundtrip your own fields (create and > verify). Of course you will eventually need to test against other >

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Basic workflow of the ARC implementation

2016-03-13 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Aditya Divekar writes: > > > 4. ARC Authentication Result - arc verification code completed. tests > > > passed. merge request created. > > > > How do you propose to create tests for #4? > > > > > Here, we could consider a few scenarios- > 1. A message is passed to the function which

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Basic workflow of the ARC implementation

2016-03-13 Thread Aditya Divekar
> Stephen Turnbull writes: > This is all already in the message or msg_data objects, except for the > value of "i" itself. So I'm not sure what you're saying. My point is > merely that any header field mentioned in any of the relevant RFCs > that can be validated must be validated to conform to

[Mailman-Developers] Gsoc Support for Message queue based email archiver

2016-03-13 Thread Anirudh Dahiya
Hello I am a computer scrience undergrad at IIIT-Hyderabad, India. I was looking through the GSoC 2016 ideas and would like to know more about the project "message queue based email archiver" I have played with codebase of mailman and postorius for some time now and am currently trying to