Re: [Mailman-Developers] Gsoc'16 Project:GitLab/development tools integration

2016-03-22 Thread Simon Hanna
Note that these are my personal thoughts and nothing official. :-) On 03/21/2016 10:50 PM, Shubham Ghiya wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Shubham Ghiya, a 3 year undergraduate from IIIT-Hyderbad. > > I was going through the GSOC 2016 ideas and found "GitLab/development tools > integration" project

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Discussion On Project Idea "Preset List Settings Templates" .

2016-03-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 13, 2016, at 03:01 AM, Harshit Bansal wrote: >Sorry, I think I have used wrong terminology here. By 'copying' I >actually meant 'inheriting'. Just a quick follow up to my previous comment about multiple inheritance. I was thinking about the way it's done in the Python code now, but even t

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Correcting the display name in the recipient address

2016-03-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 22, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Aditya Divekar wrote: >So according to what I've gathered from the conversation, the fall back on >the user name can be made implicit. The user name is to be always used in >case of missing display name for the subscribed address. Right. >The feature for suggesting

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Correcting the display name in the recipient address

2016-03-22 Thread Aditya Divekar
Hi! I certainly agree as far as mining for display names in linked, but not > subscribed, addresses. However, I do want to keep the intended semantic > that > if the *subscribed* address has no display name, we fall back to the linked > user record. The idea is that a user can set their display

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Correcting the display name in the recipient address

2016-03-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 23, 2016, at 12:03 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >I'm with Mark here. Okay cool, I think we're all in agreement about how this should behave. >I think the right thing to do is to file an RFE with Postorius to have >the "link new address" screen "suggest" the existing display names, >but

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Correcting the display name in the recipient address

2016-03-22 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Barry Warsaw writes: > On Mar 20, 2016, at 08:15 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >I wonder if we aren't over thinking here. Maybe I didn't associate a > >display name with my user record and my alternate address on purpose for > >my own reasons. Maybe when I subscribe my alternate address to some >

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSoC Project: pgp plugin

2016-03-22 Thread Jonas
I was not going to exclude anyone from a discussion relevant to them or start an offtopic conversation. I uploaded my draft yesterday, summerofcode.withgoogle.com worked after I switched from firefox to chromium. However to update the file to my local working copy – I can't help it– I had to creat