Re: [Mailman-Developers] Postorius issue tracker labels

2016-06-04 Thread Terri Oda
On 2016-06-04 3:23 PM, Simon Hanna wrote: I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it might be more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to indicate bugs that occur due to mailmanclient. 'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Postorius issue tracker labels

2016-06-04 Thread Simon Hanna
>>I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it >might be >>more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to >indicate bugs >>that occur due to mailmanclient. > >'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use the term >'mailman' >for the whole umbr

Re: [Mailman-Developers] New Interface

2016-06-04 Thread Harshit Bansal
Hi, On 04-Jun-2016 1:11 am, "Barry Warsaw" wrote: >I've always wanted styles to be composable, by which I mean that a style can >describe just a partial set of attributes.  For now I'll call these stylets. >One stylet might define how autoresponses work, while another might describe >how digests

Re: [Mailman-Developers] New Interface

2016-06-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 04, 2016, at 07:38 PM, Harshit Bansal wrote: >Would you like to keep these attributes(those which are unused and we >don't want to support) or should these be removed? For now, keep them. It would probably make sense to open an issue on gitlab listing the unused attributes to delete. We

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Postorius issue tracker labels

2016-06-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 04, 2016, at 08:46 AM, Terri Oda wrote: >I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it might be >more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to indicate bugs >that occur due to mailmanclient. 'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Postorius issue tracker labels

2016-06-04 Thread Terri Oda
On 2016-06-04 1:11 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Hi, all I just went through the labels in the Postorius issue tracker https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/labels and documented the undocumented as well as changing a couple of labels. Comments very welcome. There are two labels whose purpos

Re: [Mailman-Developers] New Interface

2016-06-04 Thread Harshit Bansal
Hi, Thanks for replying in spite of being busy! > As you've noticed, some of the attributes in the model class aren't > described > in the interface. Those are mostly the legacy attributes which should > eventually go away (because they are unused or represent features we don't > want to support)

[Mailman-Developers] Postorius issue tracker labels

2016-06-04 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Hi, all I just went through the labels in the Postorius issue tracker https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/labels and documented the undocumented as well as changing a couple of labels. Comments very welcome. There are two labels whose purpose I'm unclear on, "subscription" and "ui". I think