On 6 May 2001, at 21:44, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BAW> I've uploaded the Mailman 2.0.5 patch and tarball to
> BAW> SourceForge. Please check out
>
> The 2.0.5 tarball had a bug in the admindb.py. Thanks to Phil Barnett
> wh
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> Just for info: No stale locks showed up over the weekend with
MM> 2.0.5, and messages are still happily flowing.
MM> 2.0.5 looks good.
Yay!
MM> Thanks Barry
MM> Marc
You're very welcome, thanks for the feedback. A
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BAW> I've uploaded the Mailman 2.0.5 patch and tarball to
BAW> SourceForge. Please check out
The 2.0.5 tarball had a bug in the admindb.py. Thanks to Phil Barnett
who helped discover this. The patch file did not have the bug.
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> I'll try to remember to check it again on sunday night and report back.
Just for info:
No stale locks showed up over the weekend with 2.0.5, and messages are still
happily flowing.
2.0.5 looks good.
Thanks Barry
Marc
--
Microsoft i
* (Barry A. Warsaw)
| On the third hand, maybe bin/update should just be culled of all
| ability to upgrade from a pre-2.0 revision? In that case, I'll bet
| bin/update can just go away.
Please, please, please, please don't do that. It will force me to
maintain that code in Debian, because De
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:25:52PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> The problem is that while the dolist() step happens unconditionally,
> it only needs to be done if it updates the archive_directory or
> private_archive_file_dir attributes. Below is a patch to skip this
> step if those attrs don'
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> The uprade procedure was a bit painful, because once again,
MM> update touched all my lists as root, recreated all the
MM> config.db files as root, which broke all the lists on my
MM> system (admittedly, that's my fault fo
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:58:54PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've uploaded the Mailman 2.0.5 patch and tarball to SourceForge.
> Please check out
>
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=103
lynx -dump http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/test |
Hi all,
I've uploaded the Mailman 2.0.5 patch and tarball to SourceForge.
Please check out
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=103
I've tested this on my system and on {python,zope}.org and it seems to
work well. Still, I would love to get some feedback on this specific
