On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 14:07, Ron Jarrell wrote:
> So, because I updated from cvs a long time ago, then got distracted
> (becoming management makes it difficult to be useful sometimes, ya
> know?) I'm running 2.2a0... How much of a pain will "downgrading" to
> 2.1.6b2 be? I know update is gonna
So, because I updated from cvs a long time ago, then got distracted
(becoming management makes it difficult to be useful sometimes, ya
know?) I'm running 2.2a0... How much of a pain will "downgrading" to
2.1.6b2 be? I know update is gonna pitch a fit, but will it do the
right thing?
_
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:18:28PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
> >> - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
> >> document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
>
> > This is *not* a positive move.
>
> I'll mildly disagree if the installation ball inclu
PS - Tokio: I've got a pile of patches for the in-line documentation of
the stuff in bin/ that I need to double-check and submit. Will there be
any problem if I check them in now? I can wait if it makes your life
easier.
No problem! Thanks.
--
Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp
http://
J C Lawrence wrote:
Do note that LaTeX and TeX is a plain text format and is quite human
readable, even more so than say [nrt]roff.
For some definition of "readable" ;-) though I would probably agree that it's
moreso than *roff.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Jan 26, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:39, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I have to agree. Doesn't it make more sense to move to something like
reStructuredText if you need to produce somewhat nice-looking web or
printed documents without much effort?
I think the do
Hi,
Before some one 'fifth' this, I should say:
The plain text version mailman-install is already in the tar ball --
admin/www/mailman-install.txt. What is missing is the pointer.
Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On January 26, 2005 08:36:55 -0500 Bob Puff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I third the motion. I h
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:03:51 -0800
Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will take this back *slightly* in the case of mailman: since it's
> designed to work with a webserver, you're obviously installing it
> where the docs are actually viewable (at least if they're html, does
> anyone actuall
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:32:06 -0800
Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
>> document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
> This is *not* a positive move.
I'll mildly disagree if the
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:39, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I have to agree. Doesn't it make more sense to move to something like
> reStructuredText if you need to produce somewhat nice-looking web or
> printed documents without much effort?
I think the doc source doesn't make much of a difference
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 01:32, Alan Batie wrote:
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
> > - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
> > document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
>
> This is *not* a positive move. Installation instructions should be in
--On January 26, 2005 08:36:55 -0500 Bob Puff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I third the motion. I hate it when the docs for something are in
something other than plain text. I rarely am logged in with a gui -
always a terminal mode, and even html can get goofy.
Bob
I fourth it. I don't even know if
;
To: Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: mailman-developers@python.org
Sent: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:39:01 +0900
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.6 beta 2 released
> >>>>> "Alan" == Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ala
> "Alan" == Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> - Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a
>> latex document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for
>> details.
Alan> This is *not* a positive move. Installation in
Alan Batie wrote:
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
- Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
This is *not* a positive move. Installation instructions should be in a
flat text document, unless you're installin
Alan Batie wrote:
I install most software from a shell, and want to be
able to see what I'm doing without having to install the instructions on
a web server somewhere
I will take this back *slightly* in the case of mailman: since it's designed to
work with a webserver, you're obviously installin
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:32, Alan Batie wrote:
> This is *not* a positive move.
I 100% agree. Since Mailman is designed to be installed from the shell (and
certain commands run from the shell) and since a web / mail server likely is
not going to have a GUI installed on it, the docs should
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
- Most of the installation instructions have been moved to a latex
document. See admin/www/mailman-install/index.html for details.
This is *not* a positive move. Installation instructions should be in a flat
text document, unless you're installing it from a web bro
Hi,
I put together a tarball for Mailman 2.1.6 beta 2 and placed on my
Japanese Mailman site at:
http://mm.tkikuchi.net/mailman-2.1.6b2.tgz
This is the second beta release of 2.1.6 which are roughly scheduled to
be released by the end of February. Please grab it from above site and
upgrade your
19 matches
Mail list logo
