[Mailman-Developers] Re: running mailman2 supervised

On 5/22/19 2:03 AM, A. Schulze wrote: > > But I noticed a smaller bug in mailmanctl: > line 314 implement a command-line option "no-start" while > lines 43 and 326 name the option "no-restart" Fixed at . Thanks for

[Mailman-Developers] Re: running mailman2 supervised

Ye Xiaoxing: To Q1, you may look at the code of mailmanctl https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1/view/head:/bin/mailmanctl . When you are running using `mailmanctl start`, it actually forks more processes for qrunners - maybe you can modify it somehow and write a watcher

[Mailman-Developers] Re: running mailman2 supervised

On 5/21/19 12:47 PM, Abhilash Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2019, at 5:45 AM, A. Schulze wrote: >> >> Q1: is there a better way to start mailman in some kind of non forking mode? >> Q2: is it possible to run mailman3 supervised? > > Yes, you can run the "master" command in Mailman 3 to run it in

[Mailman-Developers] Re: running mailman2 supervised

On Thu, May 16, 2019, at 5:45 AM, A. Schulze wrote: > Hello, > > I'm porting a mailman installation from a legacy server into docker. > To make it not more complicated I decided to stay on the same mailman > version 2.1.29 (build from source) > > Now I'm faced to the problem that mailman is

[Mailman-Developers] Re: running mailman2 supervised

Hi Andreas, To Q1, you may look at the code of mailmanctl https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1/view/head:/bin/mailmanctl . When you are running using `mailmanctl start`, it actually forks more processes for qrunners - maybe you can modify it somehow and write a watcher