> 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is
-1
> 2. Do a + b
+1
> 3. Do a + b + c
0
And, separately, to use summaries instead of full messages for
bugs/patches/etc.
+1
--
Misha
msg05721/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Mailman-D
* Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is
-1
> 2. Do a + b
+1
> 3. Do a + b + c
0
--
| Matthew Davis /\ http://dogpound.vnet.net/ |
||
| Thursday,
Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
a. I create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list
b. Send SF tracker messages to this list instead of mailman-developers
c. Possibly (and I think optimally), retire mailman-checkins and send
the cvs diffs to mailman-coders as well. Personally, I don't see
the need for two diffe
> 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is
0
> 2. Do a + b
+1
> 3. Do a + b + c
0
4. do a + b + post summaries to mailman-developers
+1
I don't mind getting the SF messages, even on those "my poor laptop's on
dialup" days, but to be honest, they get procmailed to another folder and I
> 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is
+0
> 2. Do a + b
+1
> 3. Do a + b + c
+1
Gee, eVote could help here. I'm dawdling with the install process and
documentation, but soon.
On an eVoted list, for this poll, you'd send a message to the list address
that says:
eVote poll pu
> "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BF> I don't entirely understand this -1/0/+1 thing, but option 3
BF> would be my preference.
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0010.html
-Barry
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 12:12 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
3. Do a + b + c
I don't entirely understand this -1/0/+1 thing, but option 3 would be
my preference.
Bryan
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:12:07AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> a. I create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list
>
> b. Send SF tracker messages to this list instead of mailman-developers
>
> c. Possibly (and I think optimally), retire mailman-checkins and send
>the cvs diffs to mailman-coders as wel
> "TN" == Tom Neff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TN> It completely sucks, and has completely sucked ever since the
TN> decision was made a few months ago, that Mailman-Developers
TN> gets Cc'd on every Sourceforge update. I'm sure Barry (or
TN> whoever) felt they were doing a s
* Tom Neff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If you don't actually want to have a Developers discussion list, then shut
> it down and let people submit stuff via Sourceforge only. If you do want
> one, let us have one.
How about a mailman-developers and mailman-bugsandpatches list?
It completely sucks, and has completely sucked ever since the decision was
made a few months ago, that Mailman-Developers gets Cc'd on every
Sourceforge update. I'm sure Barry (or whoever) felt they were doing a
service, but it has practically killed discussion here and cost us many,
many kilo
11 matches
Mail list logo
