On Jan 14, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>It could try, but it wouldn't be 100% successful, and it would surely
>break DKIM signatures. A third-party add-on, sure. A Mailman
>feature, I'm -1 on that.
Right. I don't think it's a good idea for Mailman to attempt to strip body
con
Andrew Stuart writes:
> Should Mailman be stripping these out as part of its processing?
It could try, but it wouldn't be 100% successful, and it would surely
break DKIM signatures. A third-party add-on, sure. A Mailman
feature, I'm -1 on that.
___
Why would it? There isn't anything special about the link that would
tell mailman to do so.
Ideally, people would have signature separators that would cause the
footer to be trimmed, but that isn't mailman's job. (like Mark's did for
me).
On 1/13/15 10:06 PM, Andrew Stuart wrote:
Should Ma
Should Mailman be stripping these out as part of its processing?
On 12 Jan 2015, at 2:26 pm, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 01/11/2015 06:27 PM, Andrew Stuart wrote:
> errr…. is this someone saying they would prefer I wasn’t on this list? I’d
> rather hear directly from someone if you feel that way.
U
