[Mailman-Users] Archive access with only password?

2002-03-29 Thread Gary Wang
I was hacking around my new Mailman setup, and found out to my great surprise: The private archives are accessible without a username. Well, that's only half the story, but it really caught me by surprise. I eventually figured out that the list is accessible by entering just the admin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Archive access with only password?

2002-03-29 Thread Ron Jarrell
At 10:41 PM 3/29/02 +0900, Gary Wang wrote: I was hacking around my new Mailman setup, and found out to my great surprise: The private archives are accessible without a username. Well, that's only half the story, but it really caught me by surprise. I eventually figured out that the list is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Archive access with only password?

2002-03-29 Thread Gary Wang
Well, it IS rather convinient, but I am more concerned of the potential (sort-of) security risk. Because access is allowed without username, some d00d with evil intent would have an easier time brute-forcing the password.. You know what 'they' say... to catch the bad guys, you have to think

[Mailman-Users] admin's private_roster default vs. subscriber's conceal default

2002-03-29 Thread Erik J. Heels
Greetings, My list is set up so that only the administrator can view the list of subscribers. I did this by setting private_roster=2 (List admin only) on the admin's Privacy Options page. However, when subscribers login, they see that conceal=0 is the default. I.e. they see under Conceal

[Mailman-Users] publicly advertised lists in v.2.1b1

2002-03-29 Thread Gary Wang
I just installed v2.1b1, and I have to say that its support for multi-language lists is excellent! One thing I can't seem to get working is the main /mailman/admin page. It is supposed to list the publicly available mailing lists, but I don't know what that means. I haven't found the setting

[Mailman-Users] Virtual Host How-To ???

2002-03-29 Thread Francesca C Smith
Hiya, Just wondering if there is a FAQ out there somewhere that describes basic Virtual Host set-up ??? Im thinking you have to install the software for each domain in its own directory ?? Just some ideas on how this is done would be appreciated .. (Not stuff like.configure settings

[Mailman-Users] Virtual Hosting Faq ??

2002-03-29 Thread Francesca C Smith
Hiya, Just wondering if there is a FAQ out there somewhere that describes basic Virtual Host set-up ??? Im thinking you have to install the software for each domain in its own directory ?? Just some ideas on how this is done would be appreciated .. (Not stuff like .configure settings .. That I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman problem - gid not find

2002-03-29 Thread Carfield Yim
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, RUSSELL P JONES wrote: from the directory with the install files for mailman... %make clean %./configure --with-mail-gid=65534 %make install see if that helps. this is a really common problem (getting the wrong group-id) and is addressed in the mailman faq Thx

[Mailman-Users] Re: Virtual Hosting Faq ??

2002-03-29 Thread Will Yardley
Francesca C Smith wrote: Just wondering if there is a FAQ out there somewhere that describes basic Virtual Host set-up ??? well there was a thread on this just yesterday, so you might check the archives. Im thinking you have to install the software for each domain in its own directory ??

[Mailman-Users] re Mailman

2002-03-29 Thread schuetzen - RKBA!
in re your url at http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/MM21/features.html I have about a dozen elists on Yahoogroups and would love to get them off there and onto a webhost (which I am also looking for) but I really and truly like ALL the features of YHG's email software. I would like to see -

[Mailman-Users] Posts held for approval

2002-03-29 Thread sean pambianco
Hi, I'm moving a live list over to a different server, before the move could be completed there were some pending posts held for administor approval, I copied over the request.db file but when I access the pending task section, the it shows that posts are being held but it can't find the

[Mailman-Users] possible type on the System Setup page?

2002-03-29 Thread DK Smith
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/install-system.html This text: % cd $prefix % chgrp mailman . % chmod a+rx,g+ws . Shoudl he chgrp and chmod commands include the switch capital R (-R) ? On a fresh installation, if I run these exact commands without the switch -R then the program

[Mailman-Users] Another mailman bug

2002-03-29 Thread Russell King
Hi, I've just been through my mailman lists handling the held postings, and I notice that mailman is playing silly buggers with the web interface. Please see: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/images/mailmangroupings.jpg I'm rapidly loosing confidence in Mailman as a decent piece of secure

[Mailman-Users] bad links on http://www.list.org/MM21/faq.html

2002-03-29 Thread dale
Sorry for the widespread distribution this is getting, but this *is* the address given on the referenced page under Email Us, so I hope this will get to the right person so this can be corrected. On page http://www.list.org/MM21/faq.html the links: (Stripmime)

[Mailman-Users] weird locking problems

2002-03-29 Thread Will Yardley
i've been having some problems with our mailman installation at the office. it's mailman 2.0.8 from the debian package (so the installation is a bit weird, to conform with debian policy etc. etc.), but seems to work pretty well most of the time. the archives are from an older mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] weird locking problems

2002-03-29 Thread Dan Mick
anyway the problem is that there are lock files, which don't have a date or time on them. if i create files in that directory, they have a date / time as they should, but the lock files look like: -rw-rw-r--2 list list 41 Mar 29 2002 adm.lock -rw-rw-r--2 list

[Mailman-Users] Re: weird locking problems

2002-03-29 Thread Will Yardley
Dan Mick wrote: What you're seeing is that the lock file timestamp is in the future, and that's by design; the file timestamp is used as the 'expiration time' to break stale locks. It's normal behavior. Do you think it's causing problems? (This 'feature' of ls is not well known, but

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: weird locking problems

2002-03-29 Thread Dan Mick
in any event, i wasn't sure if this was the problem; however removing the locks generally fixes the problems (ie messages on the list won't appear and after removing the locks, they do). There may well be locking issues, but the future timestamp is not evidence. Try checking for the PIDs;

[Mailman-Users] Files and Mailman... a question.

2002-03-29 Thread Paul L. Schumacher
Yahoo groups has a service that allows users to upload files, and it notifies the users of new uploads. Can this, or has this been done with Mailmna? thanks -- Paul L. Schumacher Winona State University Computer Science Department --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: how to remove List-* headers

2002-03-29 Thread Ron Jarrell
At 12:37 PM 3/29/02 -0500, Tom Neff wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:53:00 +1100 Darryl Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if there was an option to turn on or off the email headers that mailman adds. This is one of their ideological hot buttons - you're not supposed to WANT to turn

Re: [Mailman-Users] possible type on the System Setup page?

2002-03-29 Thread Gary Wang
I think that is how it's should be, since on a fresh install, these commands are entered *before* you `make install`. On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 09:06 AM, DK Smith wrote: http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/install-system.html This text: % cd $prefix % chgrp mailman . % chmod

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: how to remove List-* headers

2002-03-29 Thread Tom Neff
--On Friday, March 29, 2002 9:30 PM -0500 Ron Jarrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 2.1 you can go into mm_cfg.py and break RFC2369 compliance by setting ALLOW_RFC2369_OVERRIDES to 1. That'll enable a policy at your site that list owners can turn it off, which will cause the cgi scripts to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Another mailman bug

2002-03-29 Thread Ron Jarrell
At 03:43 PM 3/28/02 +, Russell King wrote: Hi, I've just been through my mailman lists handling the held postings, and I notice that mailman is playing silly buggers with the web interface. Please see: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/images/mailmangroupings.jpg What's the issue? The