I'm trying to setup virtual hosting on a test install of MM 2.1 rc1 ... my
default list host is midrange.com, and the virtual is
lists.fallingrock.net.
I've setup a virtual hosted list with the 'lists.fallingrock.net' domain,
but when I send a message to the list I get odd results.
Some of the
DG == David Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DG Any ideas why the reply-to, send, errors-to, etc, all have
DG 'midrange.com' instead of 'lists.fallingrock.net'?
Your MTA is probably munging them.
-Barry
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
MT == Marco Trevisan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MT There are some variable I lost or still I don't know, or it's
MT a feature that is not available on 2.0.13 version?
It's not possible in MM2.0, but it is in MM2.1.
-Barry
--
Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
DG Any ideas why the reply-to, send, errors-to, etc, all have
DG 'midrange.com' instead of 'lists.fallingrock.net'?
Your MTA is probably munging them.
Thanks! That's what I needed to know.
Dear all,
is there anywhere a how to that exlains in a step-by-step manner how
to setup mailing lists for virtual hosts?
I assume that the
add_virtualhost('host')
is sufficient to cope with the different virtual hosts.
But how can I do the following:
My scenario:
- I have a few domains
Maybe it's the version. Mine is version 2.0.13 and what do you have?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
J == JMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
J Maybe it's the version. Mine is version 2.0.13 and what do you
J have?
I'm only dealing with MM2.1 issues now -- it's more than enough to
keep my plate quite full.
-Barry
--
Mailman-Users
Dear all,
I do not understand how to configure a read only mailing list with
2.1rc1.
Thanks for any hint!
Lukas
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch
Wanna know anything about raw ip?
Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on http://www.rawip.org
--
Mailman-Users
Sunday, December 29, 2002, 2:06:27 PM, you wrote:
MG == Mark Geisinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MG Is autorespond_requests broken in 2.1x, or do I perhaps
MG misunderstand its purpose? I'm using 2.1b4 and would like to
MG avoid having a request autoresponse sent to a subscribe
At 22:35 -0600 12/30/2002, Mark Geisinger wrote:
My point is a) that traffic for subscription confirms is redundant, and b)
it's
actually confusing subscribers. Since moving from v2.0.13, where this behavior
didn't exist, I've actually had a number of folks miss the purpose of the
subscription
On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 12:30:45 AM, you wrote:
And we've had in 2.0.x subscribers fail to confirm because (as of 2.0.6,
anyhow), the request could easily be misread as an acknowledgement. We hacked
the message a little to make it more obvious. (Old news now.)
Darn pesky users. ;}
11 matches
Mail list logo