[Mailman-Users] Race condition with summary moderation screen?

2003-01-02 Thread David Shaw
I just upgraded to 2.1 and noticed an interesting race condition with the summary version of the moderation page. Take this timeline: 1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends 3 messages to the list 2) moderator visits summary moderation page and sees the 3 messages 3) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends another message

Re: [Mailman-Users] mm2.1 - message is unparsable

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BF> I guess now that mm2.1 has been released, general questions BF> should go here? If not, let me know and I'll send to -dev. Yes. For now, I'm reading this list and trying to answer questions just to get folks familiar with 2.1

Re: [Mailman-Users] upgrading plaintext patched 2.0.13 to 2.1

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "DP" == Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DP> I apologize for my total ignorance of Python - the only DP> programming I usually do is of concerts and recitals :-) Cool! One of these days we definitely need a Mailman jam session. :) DP> The upgrading readme for 2.1 ment

Re: [Mailman-Users] Archive and web link problems with 2.1

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JS" == John Swartzentruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JS> 1. When I go to the private archive for a list at JS> http://mcswartz.org.swartz/mailman/private/listname, I see the ---^^^ Wow, I wasn't aware that "swartz" was a new TLD. :) JS> Is this a

Re: [Mailman-Users] 'advertised' setting being ignored (problem in2.1?)

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BF" == Bob Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BF> I'm trying out version 2.1 and am having problems with the BF> 'advertised' option. This can be changed by a list BF> administrator and 'list_lists -a' will show or not show it, BF> depending on the current setting.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman rpm for RedHat 7.3?

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "RW" == Rich West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RW> I rolled an RPM earlier today. If anyone finds it useful, RW> feel free to use it. RW> ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/i386/mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm RW> ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/SRPMS/mailman-2.1-1.src.rpm RW> Now th

Re: [Mailman-Users] sync_members traceback errors still there -- anyone using itsuccessfully?

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "NWC" == NOW Website Coordinator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NWC> I upgraded to the very latest release of 2.1 and I still NWC> can't get sync_members to work. Dumb bugs on my part. Here's a patch. -Barry Index: sync_members ===

Re: [Mailman-Users] Converting 2.0 to 2.1

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "MJ" == Matthias Jänichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MJ> 1.) we have a problem with missing lists in the lists MJ> overview, while they appear in the admin overview. Will this MJ> be fixed in 2.1, if not, what might be wrong (settings already MJ> checked, same for all lists

Re: [Mailman-Users] features or bugs ?

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "jb" == jorge becerra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jb> 1-I have .mbox older than one year with archivers configured jb> to one month. I recreate the files and bin/arch seems to know jb> not much about the years, he mixes january from 2002 and jb> 2003. Is there any way to av

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM2.1 > Some question resolved, another onequestion.

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
I don't use Qmail, so others will have to speak up, but you might look at the following two patches: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=645513&group_id=103&atid=300103 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=621257&group_id=103&atid=300103 to see if they h

[Mailman-Users] mm2.1 - message is unparsable

2003-01-02 Thread Bryan Fullerton
I guess now that mm2.1 has been released, general questions should go here? If not, let me know and I'll send to -dev. Just installed mm2.1 and moved over some lists yesterday. Today I found the following in logs/error: Jan 02 18:58:19 2003 (35619) message is unparsable: 1041551899.569575+7753

[Mailman-Users] upgrading plaintext patched 2.0.13 to 2.1

2003-01-02 Thread Dan Phillips
I apologize for my total ignorance of Python - the only programming I usually do is of concerts and recitals :-) The upgrading readme for 2.1 mentions problems with versions having plaintext patch #413752. I followed the links and read all that is there, and also searched the archives, but am u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem when starting mailmanctl ("Cannot import runner module xxx")

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "ST" == Sebastian Talmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I use Mailman 2.1 with | Python 2.1.1 (#1, Oct 25 2001, 09:53:13) | [GCC 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)] on linux Start by upgrading to Python 2.1.3. I'm not sure that's your problem, but I just tested it with that version and i

Re: [Mailman-Users] vhosts (does it ever end?)

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "AMK" == Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AMK> Under MM2.0.x I created separate installations for AMK> different virtual hosts. This allowed me to create the same AMK> list name, on a different virtual host without having mailman AMK> conflict. Now, with M

[Mailman-Users] Problem when starting mailmanctl ("Cannot import runner module xxx")

2003-01-02 Thread Sebastian Talmon
Hi, when I start mailmanctl (with ./mailmanctl start) it shows many errors: # ./mailmanctl start Starting Mailman's master qrunner. Cannot import runner module Mailman.Queue.IncomingRunner No module named _weakref Cannot import runner module Mailman.Queue.VirginRunner No module named _weakref Ca

[Mailman-Users] vhosts (does it ever end?)

2003-01-02 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Under MM2.0.x I created separate installations for different virtual hosts. This allowed me to create the same list name, on a different virtual host without having mailman conflict. Now, with MM2.1, how should I continue to do this? I have one single machine that hosts several domains.

Re: [Mailman-Users] 'advertised' setting being ignored (problem in2.1?)

2003-01-02 Thread Bill Hilburn
If I am not mistaken the URL in the list DB must match the URL for the list. So if I move a list from one server to another (different URL's) I have to run bin/fix_url to update the URL in the list DB. One way to check is the run bin/dumpdb, let it scroll, at the bottom will be the list URL, i

[Mailman-Users] retrieve subscriber list by email?

2003-01-02 Thread Christopher Adams
Is there a way, via email to get a list of subscribers to a list? Christopher Adams Library Systems Analyst Oregon State Library 503-378-4243 x258 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman

[Mailman-Users] 'advertised' setting being ignored (problem in 2.1?)

2003-01-02 Thread Bob Franklin
Hi, I'm trying out version 2.1 and am having problems with the 'advertised' option. This can be changed by a list administrator and 'list_lists -a' will show or not show it, depending on the current setting. However, on the 'listinfo' page at 'http://.../mailman/listinfo/', it doesn't show up; I

[Mailman-Users] aliases in README.QMAIL

2003-01-02 Thread Stanton Schell
I am running qmail as my MTA and I just installed 2.1 final and was getting deferrals based on "Illegal_command:_mailcmd/" and "Illegal_command:_mailowner/". I changed the aliases for the list to use the commands "request" and "owner" instead of "mailcmd" and "mailowner" and that fixed things.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Install issue on Mac OS 10.2.3

2003-01-02 Thread Jean-Michel Biraghi
Glen, Charles, I forgot to install the Developer Tools indeed. Thank's a lot. Jean-Michel Biraghi 4D Hispano El Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:54:00 -0500, Glen Foster escribió : > Jean-Michel. > > You need to install the OS X Developer Tools to build software. > > Glen Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Je

[Mailman-Users] Chaning users' e-mail addy

2003-01-02 Thread Bob Sully
Greetings: Using 2.0.8 under RedHat Linux 7.3 with no problems. Is there an easy way to change a user's e-mail address in the database without having to unsubscribe/resubscribe them? Failing that, how can I do it while preserving their existing password?? I have noted the announcement of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman rpm for RedHat 7.3?

2003-01-02 Thread Rich West
I rolled an RPM earlier today. If anyone finds it useful, feel free to use it. ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/i386/mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/SRPMS/mailman-2.1-1.src.rpm Now the idea of "own responsibility" might be a little shaky. :) -Rich > > "DKP" == David K Pa

[Mailman-Users] Lotus Notes

2003-01-02 Thread John_Minkle
All the messages I get from the mailman-users list have no body. I am using the Lotus Notes client accessing mail on a lotus notes server. I can only see the message body if I use Notes webmail. Any ideas? -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PRO

[Mailman-Users] features or bugs ?

2003-01-02 Thread jorge.becerra
Hi: I upgrade to Mailman 2.1 and found two things : 1-I have .mbox older than one year with archivers configured to one month. I recreate the files and bin/arch seems to know not much about the years, he mixes january from 2002 and 2003. Is there any way to avoid that if a have more that a year

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman rpm for RedHat 7.3?

2003-01-02 Thread Grant
> Is there a packaged rpm for RedHat 7.3 for Mailman 2.1? > I'm sure that once 2.1 has been released for a bit an RPM will be created based on RedHat 8.0. Grant -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/li

[Mailman-Users] Archive and web link problems with 2.1

2003-01-02 Thread John Swartzentruber
I just installed Mailman 2.1 this morning. I'm discovering a couple problems and I'm not sure if they are mine or mailman's. 1. When I go to the private archive for a list at http://mcswartz.org.swartz/mailman/private/listname, I see the usual possibilities. Unfortunately the links do not work. Fo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman rpm for RedHat 7.3?

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "DKP" == David K Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DKP> Is there a packaged rpm for RedHat 7.3 for Mailman 2.1? If someone wants to build and contribute one, and own responsibility for it, I'll be happy to add it as a file download on SF. -Barry -

[Mailman-Users] Mailman rpm for RedHat 7.3?

2003-01-02 Thread Parker, David K
Is there a packaged rpm for RedHat 7.3 for Mailman 2.1? David Parker Systems/Network Administrator Information Technology Services City of Bryan, Bryan Texas -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1b3+/CVS --> 2.1 Upgrade

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "KJ" == Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KJ> Any different/special procedures/"gotchas" to be aware of when KJ> upgrading from a CVS (2.1b3+) distribution? Shouldn't be. -Barry -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

[Mailman-Users] Thank you for MM2.1!

2003-01-02 Thread Kaja P. Christiansen
To Barry and the development team: Thank you for MM2.1 final, your efforts and time (and a great Christmas gift as well!) Kaja -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ:

[Mailman-Users] 2.1b3+/CVS --> 2.1 Upgrade

2003-01-02 Thread Kenneth Jacker
Most of the "upgrading" suggestions relate to previous, non-CVS releases. Any different/special procedures/"gotchas" to be aware of when upgrading from a CVS (2.1b3+) distribution? Thanks, -Kenneth -- Prof Kenneth H Jacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Science Dept www.cs.appstate.ed

[Mailman-Users] Upgrade to 2.1 with Sendmail not mailing to list?

2003-01-02 Thread Rich West
This is probably a quick one, but I thought I would mail it out to the list. I did check the archives, but didn't have much luck. We are running 2.0.13 and I took on the task of upgrading to 2.1. Our RH-based server is running Sendmail (8.12.7) and happily chugging along managing a few dozen lis

Re: [Mailman-Users] Full personalization

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "GD" == Guillaume Duteil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GD> Is there a way to set "Full personalization" as default for GD> all mailing lists ? Nope. -Barry -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM 2.1 compatible MM-htdig integration patchesavailable

2003-01-02 Thread Kaja P. Christiansen
Hello Richard, > I have posted on sourceforge MM 2.1 compatible versions of my patches to > support integration of MM with htdig. Many thanks for making the patches so quickly. > The order in which the patches should be applied is as follows: > > >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.p

[Mailman-Users] Full personalization

2003-01-02 Thread Guillaume Duteil
Hello Is there a way to set "Full personalization" as default for all mailing lists ? I looked in Mailman/Default.py but I didn't find anything about it... Guizmo -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: [Mailman-Users] No module named korean

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "chaim" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: chaim> Thank you. I downloaded the package from list.org and they chaim> didn't mention anything about it being pre-2.1 beta. Can chaim> you suggest where I can find the 2.1 final and what the chaim> exact size of the file should be?

Re: [Mailman-Users] No module named korean

2003-01-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "chaim" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: chaim> Thank you for your help so far on this issue. Have you chaim> found anything new since your last email? This was resolved in 2.1 final. You must have the python -devel package installed, but the test for this was broken in the pre-2.

Re: [Mailman-Users] No module named korean

2003-01-02 Thread chaim
On 2 Jan 2003 at 11:27, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > > "chaim" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > chaim> Thank you for your help so far on this issue. Have you > chaim> found anything new since your last email? > > This was resolved in 2.1 final. You must have the python -devel > p

[Mailman-Users] MM 2.1 compatible MM-htdig integration patchesavailable

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Barrett
I have posted on sourceforge MM 2.1 compatible versions of my patches to support integration of MM with htdig. There is now a third precursor patch that needs to be applied to correct some defects in some HTML templates in the MM 2.1 distribution. The order in which the patches should be applie

Re: [Mailman-Users] No module named korean

2003-01-02 Thread chaim
Thank you for your help so far on this issue. Have you found anything new since your last email? thanx, chaim -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.o

Re: [Mailman-Users] Install issue on Mac OS 10.2.3

2003-01-02 Thread Charles Sebold
On 28 Teveth 5763, Jean-Michel Biraghi wrote: > I use the very useful Kathleen Webb's step guide to install mailman > 2.1 on Jaguar 10.2.3. I know nothing about Unix... > > Everything is OK till step 4 with the permissions. The two commands > "make" and "bin/check_perms" are not found... and I ca

[Mailman-Users] Install issue on Mac OS 10.2.3

2003-01-02 Thread Jean-Michel Biraghi
Hi all, I use the very useful Kathleen Webb's step guide to install mailman 2.1 on Jaguar 10.2.3. I know nothing about Unix... Everything is OK till step 4 with the permissions. The two commands "make" and "bin/check_perms" are not found... and I can't go on... I've tried as administrator and

[Mailman-Users] sync_members traceback errors still there -- anyone using itsuccessfully?

2003-01-02 Thread NOW Website Coordinator
I upgraded to the very latest release of 2.1 and I still can't get sync_members to work. I get either: If I use: sync_members -f /home/lists/testing.txt list-name I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/sync_members", line 286, in ? main() File "/usr/loc

[Mailman-Users] MM2.1 No posting.

2003-01-02 Thread Marco Trevisan | Bazzmann.Com
Hi there! I'm sorry but I'm still in trouble... I modified the .qmail-* files regarding alias to mailman wrapper but I'm continuing to have problem on posting messages and get help from *-request (and some other problem). I have a RedHat 7.2, QMail using Plesk Control Panel 2.5. So, last version 2

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with aliases

2003-01-02 Thread Gary Frederick
He has it up and running. Thanks for the input. It was an oops with the two aliases tables. Thanks all. Gary Steve Burling wrote: --On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 2:06 PM -0600 Gary Frederick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to help someone set up a Mailman list. He has Debian, Mailman v

[Mailman-Users] "Invite" vs. autoresponders

2003-01-02 Thread Stonewall Ballard
I've recently discovered that vacation autoresponders will subscribe recipients to Mailman lists when they get "invited". This is not good. It makes the feature dangerous if you've promised to not subscribe anyone without their assent. Is there any way to avoid this problem, other than not using

[Mailman-Users] Converting 2.0 to 2.1

2003-01-02 Thread Matthias Jänichen
Hi! We just downloaded 2.1 (congratulations!) Some questions came up: 1.) we have a problem with missing lists in the lists overview, while they appear in the admin overview. Will this be fixed in 2.1, if not, what might be wrong (settings already checked, same for all lists) 2.) can we switc

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with aliases

2003-01-02 Thread Steve Burling
--On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 2:06 PM -0600 Gary Frederick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to help someone set up a Mailman list. He has Debian, Mailman version: 2.0.13-2 and Postfix's version: 1.1.11-2. He looked over the web and the archives here and is stuck. The problem: >After ru

[Mailman-Users] Signup problems with MM2.0.13

2003-01-02 Thread Christoph Wille
I get lots of such error messages: ** An unexpected Mailman error has occurred in MailCommandHandler.ParseMailCommands(). Here is the traceback: Traceback (innermost last): File "/home/mailman/Mailman/MailCommandHandler.py", line 235, in ParseMailCommands self.__dispatch[cmd](