* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Can anyone tell me what "unsupported map type: db" could mean?
postalias doesn't support the maptype db.
postconf -m
tells you the supported maptypes.
Usually, the maptype must be hash (files with suffix .db) or btree
(files also with suffix .db). There
Is there some way to turn on bounce notification to the admin in version
2.1b4?
Thanks
Thomas
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw
hey,
I am my wits end here. I have followed the faq to the letter on my debian
woody box.
this is the main problem:
gymaware:~# exim -bt gymaware-users
user "gymaware-users" for file existence test not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is undeliverable:
unknown local-part "gymaware-users" in domain "gy
Hi everybody!
First of all, I'd like to say that Mailman is a really impressive
collection of software. I can't believe how much functionality has
been put into this, and I just needed to congratulate the authors for
making this available for the world, and for free!
That said, I think I found a
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Jon Carnes wrote:
JC>Version 2.1 automatically creates the aliases in ~mailman/data/aliases so
JC>you can include that in your MTA's alias checks and from that point on the
JC>aliases are created automagically. Read the INSTALL file. What could be
JC>better than that?
Ah ex
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 04:30:40PM -0600, Jon Carnes wrote:
> It's in the FAQ's,
> - delete the heldmsg-... files in ~mailman/data/.. (these are the actual
> messages)
> - in version 2.1 simply delete the request.db file
> ~mailman/lists//..
>in version 2.0 copy a request.db from another lis
Since upgrading to 2.1, I've been receiving this "Uncaught Bounce
Notification".
It says:
The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce
format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted
from it. This mailing list has been configured to send all
unrecogn
We just created a list that we compiled from other lists, and I've sent one
message to it, and our Sun Netra X1 with 512 meg RAM is having a very tough
time. What really concerns me when I do a "top" is how much RAM the
various mailman processes are taking up right now:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NI
On 26 Jan 2003 13:27:03 -0500
Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recommend that you front-end your mail servers with something like
> Spam Assassin. If you really want to be thorough you can use
> Mailscanner with an anti-virus application that runs on
> Linux. Mailscanner will then use th
Hello there,
I have a problem that seems similar to the one described in http://www.mail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10128.html
My setup: Mac OS X 10.2.3, postfix installed via fink and the latest mailman 2.1
release.
Executing the commands newlist, list_lists or rmlist gives me the error you can see
The cross-site scripting bug in Mailman 2.1.0 that was reported on
Bugtraq has been fixed. My thanks to all who reported this (except
unfortunately the person who posted it to bugtraq before contacting me
first. :/ ). Special thanks to Tokio Kikuchi who worked out the
essential fix.
The patch i
Hello all,
I have MM2.1 installed in combination with qmail.
The MM list that I am setting up right now is as a replacement for a majordomo
one.
One question still remains (and should be solved urgently, as I'm preparing
everything to move my list once DNS updates are done) is: how do I set the
As for the list names being mined for spam, I've found that the biggest
worry is the web-enabled archives.
It doesn't seem very likely to me that spammers would find the list
addresses in the archives. Obviously, the addresses of posters are
there (these can be obscured in 2.1, right?), but
I looked through all the docs and list archives for an answer to this, but
didn't find one, so here goes.
I have several large & active lists on Host A that's running Mailman 1.1.
I have a new server, Host B, that's more powerful and the new home, etc,
etc, and already has a few active lists ru
I recommend that you front-end your mail servers with something like
Spam Assassin. If you really want to be thorough you can use
Mailscanner with an anti-virus application that runs on Linux.
Mailscanner will then use the local anti-virus application to scan all
messages for viruses and then pum
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 00:57, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Often the programmers and the development team overlook things in upgrading
> because they don't have the same experience as the end user. I want to point out
> such a case to you so you can fix 2.1.
>
> As a 2.0.11 user I did not need the list "
Hello Mailman folk,
I work with a group that provides services to student groups at a
university, and we're concerned that a lot of the lists have been
picking up spam lately. The prime suspect, at this point, is Mailman's
publishing of list names. If you can provide any input on how to
alle
17 matches
Mail list logo
