I changed the domain on my mail list. When I log into the admin site all
the links still show the old domain. Anybody know what i need to do to
change this.
Thanks
Troy
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
I have a number of Mailman lists on my server. I want to retain control
of the list configuration settings centrally (and not give out the
administrator password to others), but allow each list owner to moderate
and manage the subscriptions. Mailman does not seem to allow for the
moderator to
Dear Mailman users,
I've been trying to get mailman 2.1.5 to work on my OS X (10.3.8, not
server) machine for some time. I have root access. My postfix mail
agent is working correctly (I can send email from my box and receive
mail). I've used Larry Stone's archive posting to guide my
Dan,
Thanks! That seems to have taken care of the bug problem.
Jason
On Mar 25, 2005, at 9:25 AM, Dan Phillips wrote:
On Mar 25, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Jason Miller wrote:
-rw-r- 1 mailman mailman 16384 25 Mar 08:47 aliases.db
alaises.db must be group writable. See
At 9:25 AM -0800 2005-03-24, Peter McCarroll wrote:
I have a number of Mailman lists on my server. I want to retain control
of the list configuration settings centrally (and not give out the
administrator password to others), but allow each list owner to moderate
and manage the subscriptions.
On 3/25/2005 10:35, Ross Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been struggling with a delivery error on mailman that I could
use some help with. I'm using postfix w/ amavis-new and cyrus for local
users. The trouble I'm having is when a local users have exceeded thier
quota, the messages
At 11:00 AM -0800 2005-03-25, John W. Baxter wrote:
Interestingly, the O'Reilly book
Postfix, The Definitive Guide (my copy was printed in Dec 2003...first
edition) does not mention quota in its index.
That's because quotas like this don't actually
John W. Baxter wrote:
On 3/25/2005 10:35, Ross Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been struggling with a delivery error on mailman that I could
use some help with. I'm using postfix w/ amavis-new and cyrus for local
users. The trouble I'm having is when a local users have exceeded thier
I've been using Mailman with exim on Mac OSX. I started with
sendmail (because it comes with OSX and I'm somewhat familiar
with it), but soon got tired of having to wrestle it into submission
all the time and switched to exim. I've been very pleased with exim's
performance and integration with
At 1:46 PM -0600 2005-03-25, Ross Anderson wrote:
Well the confusion I seem to be having here is cyrus-mailman related
since it is the program handling local quota's. Cyrus bounces mail when
single mail is recieved from local or outside mail accounts.
What LDA do you have configured for use
At 11:55 AM -0800 2005-03-25, Heather Madrone wrote:
The OSX setup, however, is only a stopgap while I get my permanent
server set up. I've been looking for an open source operating system
that will run well on our Ultra 5 (sparc). We were going with Debian,
which then announced that it's
On 3/25/2005 13:08, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've got Exim 3.x and you want to use Mailman 2.1.x,
you're screwed.
Debian woody notwithstanding, no one should be installing and running Exim 3
these days. There is essentially no one readily available (eg, on the
exim-users
Thanks for your detailed answer, Brad. I appreciate your
opinion on this subject. If Postfix will do a better job than
exim, I don't mind switching at all.
At 10:08 PM +0100 3/25/05, Brad Knowles wrote:
In terms of providing good support for UltraSPARC, Solaris is
going to be best, and I
On 3/25/2005 14:25, Heather Madrone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, I've never tried Postfix, so my only point of comparison is
sendmail. I am fairly confident that any MTA would look simple and
friendly next to sendmail.
You probably shouldn't say any in that context. Exchange lurks
At 1:48 PM -0800 2005-03-25, John W. Baxter wrote:
Debian woody notwithstanding, no one should be installing and running Exim 3
these days. There is essentially no one readily available (eg, on the
exim-users mailing list) who remembers much about it.
Think someone who already has Exim 3 on
On 3/25/2005 14:14, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian woody notwithstanding, no one should be installing and running Exim 3
these days. There is essentially no one readily available (eg, on the
exim-users mailing list) who remembers much about it.
Think someone who already
At 2:25 PM -0800 2005-03-25, Heather Madrone wrote:
FreeBSD works great if you don't need a keyboard, a mouse, or a monitor.
They are oriented towards the serial console at the moment, but
I'm sure that the rest will come along. I've got four UltraSPARC 10
clones that I plan on using under
At 4:02 PM -0800 2005-03-25, John W. Baxter wrote:
And I have no way to help them. I could probably manage to configure the
old Exim to work with the new Mailman, but I have no interest in doing so.
Therein lies a big part of the problem. If you're not willing to
help, and the rest of the
-Original Message-
From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John W. Baxter; Mailman Users; Ross Anderson
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] temporary delivery error
At 1:46 PM -0600 2005-03-25, Ross Anderson wrote:
Well
On Mar 26, 2005, at 10:12, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 4:02 PM -0800 2005-03-25, John W. Baxter wrote:
And I have no way to help them. I could probably manage to
configure the
old Exim to work with the new Mailman, but I have no interest in
doing so.
Therein lies a big part of the problem. If
On 3/25/2005 16:37, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this situation, *BSD with softupdates will be your best bet on
the filesystem side. The cool thing about softupdates is that it
re-orders the disk I/O operations in a safe manner, and if the file
is created and goes away quickly
On 3/25/2005 17:12, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This whole Exim 3/Exim 4 thing is not a problem with postfix.
Don't get me wrong, postfix isn't perfect. But what flaws it has
tend to be less visible than this, and the issue of upgrading from
one version to another usually has more
At 6:21 PM -0800 2005-03-25, John W. Baxter wrote:
Unless softupdates sees power outages and hustles the data onto disk
(which is probably feasible) it would not be considered MTA-suitable (and
Exim does what it can to prevent it, using whatever force to disk calls are
available to it).
The
At 6:31 PM -0800 2005-03-25, John W. Baxter wrote:
But at any rate, Exim 3 to ?? Is a very good opportunity to consider Postfix
rather than Exim 4 as the ??. Mailman 2.x to 3.0 will likely present a
similar opportunity to look around at what else there is.
I suspect that Mailman 2.x to 3.x
I suspect that Mailman 2.x to 3.x will not be that rough. Yes, the
Hi again,
Just out of interest, on Postfix, there is a simple option to
upgrade a running system like so (as most here will know):
make
stop postfix
make upgrade
start postfix
I have never had to upgrade Mailman, as I started
I am trying to move my heretofore working mailman installation from one
server (FreeBSD/Sendmail) to another (RedHat/Exim). I can access my
lists at my main url, but I get Page not found on the domains I host.
The error log says premature end of script headers. None of the
lists have
I am trying to move my heretofore working mailman installation from
one server (FreeBSD/Sendmail) to another (RedHat/Exim). I can access
my lists at my main url, but I get Page not found on the domains I
host. The error log says premature end of script headers. None
of the lists have
On Mar 25, 2005, at 8:04 PM, Terry Allen wrote:
I am trying to move my heretofore working mailman installation from
one server (FreeBSD/Sendmail) to another (RedHat/Exim). I can access
my lists at my main url, but I get Page not found on the domains I
host. The error log says premature end of
Lynn Siprelle wrote:
But why would it work on the main url but not the virtual ones? Here's
what I mean.
This works:
http://lsiprelle.simpli.biz/mailman/listinfo
This doesn't:
http://www.democracyfororegon.com/mailman/listinfo
Same server, same mailman installation. The first one runs fine,
On 3/25/2005 19:05, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 6:31 PM -0800 2005-03-25, John W. Baxter wrote:
But at any rate, Exim 3 to ?? Is a very good opportunity to consider Postfix
rather than Exim 4 as the ??. Mailman 2.x to 3.0 will likely present a
similar opportunity to look
On 3/25/2005 19:32, Terry Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that Mailman 2.x to 3.x will not be that rough. Yes, the
Hi again,
Just out of interest, on Postfix, there is a simple option to
upgrade a running system like so (as most here will know):
make
stop postfix
make upgrade
This works:
http://lsiprelle.simpli.biz/mailman/listinfo
This doesn't:
http://www.democracyfororegon.com/mailman/listinfo
Same server, same mailman installation. The first one runs fine, the
second one throws premature end of script headers.
What is your web server? What's in the VirtualHost (or
I should also have added that I'm using the current beta.
What is your web server? What's in the VirtualHost (or whatever)
section of the web server config for the www.democracyfororegon.com
domain?
Apache 1.3.33
VirtualHost 208.185.251.142:80
ScriptAlias /mailman/ /usr/local/mailman/cgi-bin/
33 matches
Mail list logo
