After struggling for several days to set up a dedicated subdomain for
Mailman, I wrote a howto:
http://www.qnan.org/~pmw/howtos/mailman-virtuals.html
Hopefully it will help someone. If you see ways of improving the howto
(or my setup), please let me know.
--
Philip
pgpvT7s0VEK0B.pgp
D
This is a topic I am interested in. But can someone summarize these codes to
make them simple so most people can following them easily?
-
http://www.FreeGame123.com All the games are free to play online. Playing is
the best way
Darren G Pifer wrote:
>We have been having problems with people unsubscribing messages to one
>of our lists. People on the list have been sending mail to the list, ie.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The
>administrator of the list has been getting these unsubscribes also but
>the
We have been having problems with people unsubscribing messages to one
of our lists. People on the list have been sending mail to the list, ie.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The
administrator of the list has been getting these unsubscribes also but
the list was configured this way
Jim Tittsler wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2005, at 07:29, Doc Schneider wrote:
>
Oct 13 17:12:27 2005 qrunner(20618): time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y',
day + (0,)*6))
Oct 13 17:12:27 2005 qrunner(20618): ValueError : day of year out of
range
And it bombed.
Any ideas
Randy Paries wrote:
>
>I have got my list working , but the one thing i can not figure out is
>that when i am testing the original poster does not get a copy of the
>message they posted back through the list
>
>please can someone tell me where i set that
It is a per subscriber option. The default
Philip M. White wrote:
>
>I think there is confusion here. Originally, my virtuals file looks
>like:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] cs1234
Yes, I didn't look carefully enough at the code the first time. I see
it now.
The only way to fix this so the entries look like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have got my list working , but the one thing i can not figure out is
that when i am testing the original poster does not get a copy of the
message they posted back through the list
please can someone tell me where i set that
Thanks
Randy
-
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:47:15AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Philip M. White wrote:
> >
> >So I wonder, is there any clean way of getting Mailman to append
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to every virtuals line?
>
> I'm a little confused here. If you have MTA = 'Postfix' in mm_cfg.py,
> Mailman uses the M
micah milano wrote:
>
>I put it in and restarted everything, doesn't seem to have changed
>anything... still waiting for my test message to be delivered. :(
I looked at your postfix config from your original post, and while I
don't fully understand it, I see "reject_unknown_recipient_domain,".
The
Did you try
DELIVERY_MODULE = 'Sendmail'?
If it is faster, then probably postfix does some unnecessary DNS lookups.
Regards,
Gregory
micah milano wrote:
>
> SMTP_MAX_RCPTS = 10
> DELIVERY_MODULE = 'SMTPDirect'
> DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'postfix.egg.com'
> DEFAULT_URL_HOST = 'mailman.egg.com'
>
On 10/7/05, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 3:57 PM -0700 2005-10-07, Svend Sorensen wrote:
>
> > I see. Mailman still lists the *-admin aliases when creating a list,
> > so this behavior is somewhat confusing. If *-admin is depreciated,
> > can all the *-admin aliases be removed?
On 10/14/05, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a shot in the dark, but try
>
> SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION = 1
>
> in mm_cfg.py
I put it in and restarted everything, doesn't seem to have changed
anything... still waiting for my test message to be delivered. :(
Philip M. White wrote:
>
>So I wonder, is there any clean way of getting Mailman to append
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to every virtuals line?
I'm a little confused here. If you have MTA = 'Postfix' in mm_cfg.py,
Mailman uses the Mailman/MTA/Postfix.py to update the 'aliases' and
'virtual-mailman' files w
micah milano wrote:
>
>Mailman's handoff to postfix, on this machine, is hideously slow.
>
>If I run a simple newlist command, the actual delivery of the "Your
>new mailing list" email takes over an hour to be actually sent. If I
>send a normail mail (outside of mailman), it is sent instantly.
>Mes
João Sá Marta wrote:
>
>I have looked for /home/mailman/lists/list_name/request.pck and used =
>dumpbd
>and the results were:
>[- start pickle file -]
><- start object 1 ->
>{'version': (0, 1)}
>[- end pickle file -]
This is exactly what an 'empty' request.pck looks like.
I know I must have something wrong, but no amount of reading
newsgroups, FAQs, googling, asking on IRC, or trying random things has
produced any results.
Mailman's handoff to postfix, on this machine, is hideously slow.
If I run a simple newlist command, the actual delivery of the "Your
new maili
Thanks Mark. That did it. In mm_cfg.py, PUBLIC_ARCHIVE_URL was set to
'/list-archives'. I changed it to:
PUBLIC_ARCHIVE_URL = 'http://%(hostname)s/list-archives/%(listname)s'
since we do not use pipermail. We may do so in the future.
Darren
ODU
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 19:42, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> D
Greetings,
Thanks for your help.
I have looked for /home/mailman/lists/list_name/request.pck and used dumpbd
and the results were:
[- start pickle file -]
<- start object 1 ->
{'version': (0, 1)}
[- end pickle file -]
It seems like all the others empty request.pck
I have
19 matches
Mail list logo
