Mark Sapiro wrote:
Patrick Bogen wrote:
On 5/18/06, Imre Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have some problems with a mailman list.
if i send from user A, to list L, and CC to B and C (where A,B,C are list
members on the same list), the mail i got back from the list (to user A) is
missing
On 5/19/06, Imre Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but the other members of the list do get the mail. they should see in the Cc:
that one person, who didn't get it because of above condition. or am i wrong
here?
I don't know about 'should,' but this is NOT what happens. As Mark
explains, the
Patrick Bogen wrote:
On 5/19/06, Imre Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but the other members of the list do get the mail. they should see in the Cc:
that one person, who didn't get it because of above condition. or am i wrong
here?
I don't know about 'should,' but this is NOT what happens.
John Adamski wrote:
After more research it looks like the issue is between our exchange
server and mailman. Exchange is holding all emails in a queue and
getting error 'The remover server did not respond to a connection
attempt.'
So far I have not found out why exchange can't connect or what
Mark Sapiro wrote:
I'm going to try to find out if anyone remembers why it is this way in
the first place, and if it should be continued.
The log message associated with the change says:
process(): If a member has enabled their DontReceiveDuplicates option,
we'll also strip their addresses
Jeff DeReus wrote:
It seems that adding the filter_types has one effect. When the list
subscribers get a message that has been PGP signed, the signature is
no longer valid.
I assume here that content filtering is On. There is not much Mailman
can do in these cases. I'm not sure what the
This depends on what language your internal application is written in,
and whether or not you have access to the source code.
On 5/19/06, Fabiano Breves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick,
Ok. Sorry about my next question. :-)
How can I do that? I'm not getting the header part. The header
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Regarding the original problem of the message body and attached patch
not being in the archive, I have done some testing with the latest
Scrubber, and it works properly with all the test messages Todd sent me.
I note that the annotation Skipped content of type
ASP has several different mechanisms for sending EMail, so I still
can't give a definite answer. That said, this is pretty far outside
the scope of the mailman-users list.
Also, please try to post replies to the list, also, since that frees
me from having to manually add the CC and top-post.
-
Hello!
I am very sorry to ask for help, but I run into a big problem with
mailman 2.18.
Everytime I try to call an admin-pages of mailman or a user calls his
personal admittance to his mailman-subscription I get the following
error-message:
==
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.8
I think you're misinterpreting that post. I think she is saying her
problem was caused by a footer which consisted of only a blank line
and when she removed the footer completely, the problem went away.
That's not hard for me to believe (that I'm misinterpretting, I mean).
Maybe the footer
Sorry, about the reply issue. Usually when I click on reply the address that
appears is the list... So I didn't check it.
thanks anyway...
On 5/19/06, Patrick Bogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASP has several different mechanisms for sending EMail, so I still
can't give a definite answer. That
in order to check what servers are used in the mail adresses. Is there any
way to do that?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
Markus Schanovsky wrote:
Now my question:
Who is setting the file-permissions back?
Every time Mailman saves the list, it saves it to a new, temporary
config.pck.host_name.pid file with permissions 0660. Then it
removes the config.pck.last, renames the config.pck to config.pck.last
and finally
negocios_online wrote:
in order to check what servers are used in the mail adresses. Is there any
way to do that?
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.062.htp.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California
Ulf Markwardt wrote:
I would like to automatically invite every new user of our computing center to
our mailing list. But I need an adapted text for the invitation/confirmation
request. This is, to decrease the possibility that this e-Mail might be
considered an spam by the receiver.
* Is it
Hello.
I'm new to mailman. I've used it to setup an announce-only list for a
friend who has over 1300 addresses. Up to this point, she's been simply
sending to her entire AOL address book (as this user/account is setup
specifically for people who want to receive announcements about her
Lori Christensen wrote:
None of the sub-lists that are members receive their email from umbrella
list.
Example: umbrella list name- campusfac-l
Membership for this list is
Hum-l
Soc-l
Sci-l
(these all have campusfac-l under recipient filter- Alias names
(regexps) which qualify as explicit to
Nathan wrote:
Any advice as to why this is happening? I'm assuming the problem is NOT
with mailman itself, but possibly with her webhost (maybe flagged as a
spammer by other hosts?).
That's one possibility.
For what it's worth, one other address to
which the email did get through was my
19 matches
Mail list logo
