Eric Oye wrote:
>
>But wat if i have lots of list in my
>server. Is impossible for me to remove the members by entering the list name
>one by one.
>
>bin/remove_members -f /path/to/textfile -n -N listname
#!/bin/sh
for list in `ls lists`
do bin/remove_members -f /path/to/textfile -n -N $list
done
Try something like this:
bin/remove_members -f /path/to/file --fromall -n -N
That will remove members listed in the "/path/to/file" from "all
lists" without sending user or admin acknowledgements.
Hint1: Backup your lists.
Hint2: Don't put your text file inside your /bin directory. You can
Thanks for the help, i had try the remove command you provide. It do help for
removing members from list to list. But wat if i have lots of list in my
server. Is impossible for me to remove the members by entering the list name
one by one.
bin/remove_members -f /path/to/textfile -n -N listname
At 10:22 PM -0400 2006-07-26, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> They've done whatever they've done and didn't ask for any
>> involvement from us.
>
> That doesn't seem entirely fair to the Red Hat/Fedora folks. John
> Dennis of Red Hat very clearly solicited comment on these changes on
> mailman-deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 7:21 PM + 2006-07-26, Jon Loose wrote:
[...]
>> Second, my previous install of mailman was 2.1.x running under
>> /usr/local/mailman. I note that the fedora installation already
>> seems to have mailman files distribute
At 3:00 PM +0100 2006-07-26, Stuart Wyles wrote:
> how do you preserve html formatting in the original message, and at the
> same time scrub any attachments, without the html being escaped? ie. I'm
> wanting messages arriving both at a subscribers inbox, and in the archive,
> to look like the
At 7:21 PM + 2006-07-26, Jon Loose wrote:
> The new project is a fedora core based server, purchased on a subscription.
> It runs qmail by default,
Ouch.
>and has plesk running to give some web-based
> admin.
Double ouch.
> Given the constraint that
Jon Loose wrote:
>
>First off, I've read that there are some unique issues with qmail/mailman.
>Does this make installation significantly harder than with a postfix system
>(it was as much as I could do to get the postfix/mailman system going - but
>I'm willing to persevere!) What are the main
Chris Lawson wrote:
>
>This is a good start, but you also have to read /usr/share/doc/
>mailman-2.1.8/INSTALL.REDHAT which tells you the directories mailman
>uses in FC5 have changed. Where once they were installed in /usr/
>local/mailman, the binaries and what not are now in /usr/lib/mailman
>
Dave Stern wrote:
>I have a several thousand files in $MM/data/held-msg-LISTNAME-XXX.pck
>I presume these are spam or messages that have otherwise ended up
>queued, perhaps waiting for admin approval.
Not 'perhaps', definitely they are (or at least once were) held
messages waiting for admin act
Stuart Wyles wrote:
>
>I'm
>wanting messages arriving both at a subscribers inbox, and in the archive,
>to look like the original message (html intact) with only difference from
>the original being url's replacing attachments. I'm using Mailman 2.1.6 +
>mhonarc.
>
>Is it possible? I can't seem
Hi,
I'm contemplating using mailman in a new system setup, and am hoping I could
get a "heads up" warning about potential problems from the list before killing
too much time on it.
I have installed mailman before, using postfix on a redhat (ClarkConnect)
server. It took a bit of fiddling with
Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere
how do you preserve html formatting in the original message, and at the
same time scrub any attachments, without the html being escaped? ie. I'm
wanting messages arriving both at a subscribers inbox, and in the archive,
to look like the origina
At 9:00 AM -0500 2006-07-26, Catherine Maxwell wrote:
> I would like to hear feedback about any issues that may be caused by
> using SpamAssassin on a Mailman server. Spam is getting out of
> control and the spammers are hitting the listname-owner and
> listname-request addresses hard. We need
I have a several thousand files in $MM/data/held-msg-LISTNAME-XXX.pck
I presume these are spam or messages that have otherwise ended up
queued, perhaps waiting for admin approval. I want to delete them so I
> $MM/bin/discard $MM/data/heldmsg-somelist-4586.pck
Discarded held msg #4586 for list som
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Aaron Oliver wrote:
> Hopefully someone can help me out. The list server that is currently in
>use in our organization has completely stopped sending e-mails. It has been
>restarted several times and will no longer function like it should.
What doesn't work
On Jul 26, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Todd wrote:
> This isn't really an rpm issue. It's a difference between sendmail
> and postfix. Postfix will execute the wrapper script using the group
> of the alias file where the wrapper command is defined.
Thank you for taking the trouble to explain something ev
The difference in the number of subscribers you retrieved may be that
you only got the regular subscribers and not the digest, bounced,
etc. addresses. You need to run the command again for them. The
bounced addressed are separated as byuser, byadmin and bybounce (or
something like that). The t
Hopefully someone can help me out. The list server that is currently in use in
our organization has completely stopped sending e-mails. It has been restarted
several times and will no longer function like it should.
I need to export the e-mail lists to move to a more reliable and stable
John Clement wrote:
>If I browse to that URL on our current server it shows a list of lists. If
>I go to the equivalent url on the new server (where I've already created
>some lists) I'm setting up I get
>
>There currently are no publicly-advertised Mailman mailing lists on.
>
>however if I
Michael Menge wrote:
>
>I hit one smale mistake. The last , must not be there
>
>>
>> mlist.language = { '[EMAIL PROTECTED]': 'll',
>> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]': 'll',
>> ...
>> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]': 'll'},
>
>mlist.language = { '[EMAIL PROT
I would like to hear feedback about any issues that may be caused by
using SpamAssassin on a Mailman server. Spam is getting out of
control and the spammers are hitting the listname-owner and
listname-request addresses hard. We need to get this under control
but we are getting mixed reviews her
If I browse to that URL on our current server it shows a list of lists. If
I go to the equivalent url on the new server (where I've already created
some lists) I'm setting up I get
There currently are no publicly-advertised Mailman mailing lists on.
however if I then add a list name to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
