Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/09/15 04:42 PM:
> I don't know why your installations were not all upgraded to email
> 2.5.8 when you upgraded to 2.1.9, but they should have been.
I'm just as puzzled ;-)
> Yes. In each installation there are copies of paths.py in the bin,
> cron, scripts a
Bretton Vine wrote:
>Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/09/15 04:42 PM:
>> I don't know why your installations were not all upgraded to email
>> 2.5.8 when you upgraded to 2.1.9, but they should have been.
>
>I'm just as puzzled ;-)
I think I have observed this happening in one way, but I'm
I was surprised to find the Mailman lists not on Gmane, and some
googling revealed some sort of religious flame war I don't really want
to get into. But, I think at the very least, mailman-announce should be
carried on Gmane. I don't see how that would hurt anyone. I'd really
like to just ad
At 6:30 PM + 9/16/06, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
> I was surprised to find the Mailman lists not on Gmane, and some
> googling revealed some sort of religious flame war I don't really want
> to get into.
The reason that they were removed from Gmane is that they tell us
they have a policy of
AFAIK, Gmane has a small group of administrators who add the lists.
It's possible one of them just forgot to notify you guys, or didn't
understand that he had an obligation to. I'd guess that this was an
honest mistake more than anything malicious. Having known Lars Magne
Ingebrigtsen for yea
At 7:40 PM + 9/16/06, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
>Having known Lars
> Magne Ingebrigtsen for years, he's all about being a good net
> citizen, writing software that is aggressively standards
> compliant, and all the other good things. Not to me
I understand what you're saying, but seriously, who cares if the mailman
lists were added without anyone's approval? Gmane is a valuable and
useful service and does no damage to anyone. You could think of it as
someone doing the project a favor rather than something that needs
"forgiveness."
On 9/16/06 8:25 PM, Jason R. Mastaler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I understand what you're saying, but seriously, who cares if the mailman
> lists were added without anyone's approval? Gmane is a valuable and
> useful service and does no damage to anyone. You could think of it as
> someone doi
At 1:25 AM + 9/17/06, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
> I understand what you're saying, but seriously, who cares
> if the mailman lists were added without anyone's approval?
I do. The other listowners do. Lots of other owners of other lists
that I've talked to likewise care what's being done w
On 9/16/06 11:32 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> If the Gmane folks had actually come to us first, we might well have
> approved their request to set up a gateway.
So because you feel personally offended, you choose to punish all
Mailman users by not letting Gmane carry their lists? I think you are
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
> On 9/16/06 11:32 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > If the Gmane folks had actually come to us first, we might well have
> > approved their request to set up a gateway.
> So because you feel personally offended, you choose to punish all
> M
11 matches
Mail list logo
