Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Blatter, Nicholas wrote: > >Every message is taking almost exactly 80.1 seconds, with no derivation. >Postfix's mailq is empty, and all other mail is getting through just >fine. > >Anyone have any suggestions? Why is it taking so long for it to send >each message? Because it takes Postfix that l

[Mailman-Users] Mailman performance

2006-10-19 Thread Blatter, Nicholas
Hello, I'm using Mailman 2.1.5 and Postfix to manage a small (~500) member list and I recently went through and removed everyone from the list, and then added them back in. After doing so I was watching the progress of sending the Welcome message, and noticed that Mailman is taking an exceptionall

Re: [Mailman-Users] Personalization Question

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > >I'm helping a customer set up three new lists and am running against >a small issue. I have OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION turned on and >when we send a message to the list address, the message has: > >Subject: [whatever subject] >From: >Sender: <

[Mailman-Users] Personalization Question

2006-10-19 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
I'm helping a customer set up three new lists and am running against a small issue. I have OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION turned on and when we send a message to the list address, the message has: Subject: [whatever subject] From: Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Auto-deleting mail from outside .no?

2006-10-19 Thread John W. Baxter
On 10/17/06 9:00 AM, "Thomas Gramstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have many small lists in Norwegian and they're all being > hit by a lot of spam. Yes, the spam filter holds them back -- > but then I get a /lot/ of mail about new messages waiting, > and it's a big job moderating them. > > Wha

Re: [Mailman-Users] can't get mailman and exim4 talking on my debian 3.1

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dr. Scott S. Jones wrote: > >For some reason, after a recent nightmare with a hosed partition table, my >system which had a working Mailman 2.1.5 version on it, now refuses to >connect to exim4 and get my mail out to my lists. > >Here's a snippted from /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure. I have no idea

[Mailman-Users] can't get mailman and exim4 talking on my debian 3.1

2006-10-19 Thread Dr. Scott S. Jones
For some reason, after a recent nightmare with a hosed partition table, my system which had a working Mailman 2.1.5 version on it, now refuses to connect to exim4 and get my mail out to my lists. Here's a snippted from /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure. I have no idea what these things mean but hopin

Re: [Mailman-Users] What is them max subject length?

2006-10-19 Thread Lindsay Haisley
Are you sure this isn't happening in a mail system component other than Mailman? RFC 2822 specifies that "Each line of characters MUST be no more than 998 characters, and SHOULD be no more than 78 characters, excluding the CRLF." This includes headers. My understanding of this is that an MTA is

Re: [Mailman-Users] What is them max subject length?

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Nathaniel Nolet wrote: > >it looks like sometimes a subject is too long >and gets turned into "(No Subject)", while the real subject becomes >the first line of the email. I'd like to either change this setting >or let my end users know how long is too long, but I can't find the >max subjec

Re: [Mailman-Users] Outgoing Lists

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Roman Hultay wrote: >How would one go about changing the To: field in received mailings? > >i.e. it currently says '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' but is it possible for it >to say the recipient? This would mean that each message is different for >each recipient atleast in the header. This is called Full pe

[Mailman-Users] What is them max subject length?

2006-10-19 Thread Nathaniel Nolet
Hello Mailman Users, I recently rolled out a new mailserver and decided to use Mailman as the mailing list software. Everything has been going smoothly except for one minor issue: it looks like sometimes a subject is too long and gets turned into "(No Subject)", while the real subject becom

Re: [Mailman-Users] external web interface

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
BRAVAL François wrote: > >If I remove the VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = Off and set the >DEFAULT_URL_HOST to machine2.domain.com. I get a 'bug' error. > >See my error log. > >Oct 19 13:32:48 2006 (10276) command failed: /usr/sbin/postalias >/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases (status: 127, Unknown error 127

[Mailman-Users] Outgoing Lists

2006-10-19 Thread Roman Hultay
How would one go about changing the To: field in received mailings? i.e. it currently says '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' but is it possible for it to say the recipient? This would mean that each message is different for each recipient atleast in the header. -

Re: [Mailman-Users] external web interface

2006-10-19 Thread BRAVAL François
Err.. No In fact, it doesn't seem to work. The URL is machine2.domain.com but the title of the page is machine1.domain.com When I create a new list, it uses the machine1.domain.com domain If I remove the VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = Off and set the DEFAULT_URL_HOST to machine2.domain.com. I get a 'b

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman-Users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 43

2006-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merci pour vos messages! mais je ne comprends pas bien l'anglais. Largement informé de vos activités, je vous suggère de supprimer mon adresse. Tous mes bons voeux, Patrice Rossel Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Datum: 19.10.2006 12:00 An: Betreff: Mailman-Users Digest, Vo

Re: [Mailman-Users] external web interface

2006-10-19 Thread BRAVAL François
Hi again I will use the first solution for the moment as I want 2 web servers: an internal one and one in our dmz for testing purpose. The VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = Off setting works great and I got no longer a 'bug' error on list creation. I keep the second way in mind for future usage Continue t