[Mailman-Users] disabling delivery of emails and yet be able to post

Hi, I did not find an answer to this question in the FAQ. It beats me as to why this feature has been ignored all this while. I am an infrequent poster to many mailing lists powered by mailman. In most cases, I am not interested in receiving neither digests nor individual emails from the list, bu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Load-balancing mailman between two servers

At 3:03 PM +1100 11/27/06, Guy Waugh quoted Kim Hawtin: >> How/where do you share the incoming mail list aliases that sendmail checks? >> >> Also when you create a new list, how to you update the other hosts aliases? >> > On each server, in the sendmail aliases file. So, when adding or > remov

Re: [Mailman-Users] disabling delivery of emails and yet be able to post

At 1:12 AM -0700 11/27/06, Krishna Mohan Gundu wrote: > Turning off the delivery of emails unfortunately disables posting. So > I will have enable/disable each time before/after I want to post. Is > there a better way? This is not the way it works with any version of Mailman I have ever encou

Re: [Mailman-Users] New Mailman Installation - Can't Send Email toaNewList (reformatted)

Mark Sapiro wrote: > mcjathan wrote: > >> In reading your instructions through what I discovered was that >> POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS was set to false like this: >> >> POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS = [] >> >> I'm assuming this may be the entire problem. Should this be set thusly?: >> >>

[Mailman-Users] Old lists are working. New lists discard all messages. How to debug?

I have a number of lists running happily, but a couple of new ones don't want to play. For testing purposes I subscribe myself to them and a couple of other addresses. All message sent to them from subscribed addresses get automatically discarded. I can see the discards in the vette log, but tha

Re: [Mailman-Users] New Mailman Installation - Can't Send Email toaNewList (reformatted)

On 11/27/06, mcjathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact, POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS was set in mm_cfg.py, but was not > set in Defaults.py. Should POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS not be set in > Defaults.py? Any settings in mm_cfg.py override the identical setting in Defaults.py. So, if POSTF

Re: [Mailman-Users] New Mailman Installation - Can't Send Email toaNewList (reformatted)

mcjathan sent the message below at 04:16 11/27/2006: >Mark Sapiro wrote: > > mcjathan wrote: > > > >> In reading your instructions through what I discovered was that > >> POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS was set to false like this: > >> > >> POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS = [] > >> > >> I'm assuming

Re: [Mailman-Users] New Mailman Installation - Can't Send Email toaNewList(reformatted)

mcjathan wrote: > >In fact, POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS was set in mm_cfg.py, but was not >set in Defaults.py. Should POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS not be set in >Defaults.py? You should not make any changes in Defaults.py (see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old lists are working. New lists discard allmessages. How to debug?

Brian Parish wrote: >I have a number of lists running happily, but a couple of new ones don't >want to play. For testing purposes I subscribe myself to them and a >couple of other addresses. All message sent to them from subscribed >addresses get automatically discarded. I can see the discards

[Mailman-Users] ics / iCalendar attachments?

Has anyone configured Mailman to allow ICS / iCalendar attachments? I've added text/calendar to the pass_mime_types setting in content filtering, but the ICS attachment was removed. The full content of pass_mime_types is: multipart/mixed multipart/alternative multipart/related text/plain text/ht

[Mailman-Users] trying to access archives - access denied

Hello, I am the manger for a couple of different lists that are relatively new. It has come to my attention in the last few days that our members are unable to access the archives when they click on the archives link (http://lists.genuinecontact.info/pipermail/genuinecontact/). When you clic

Re: [Mailman-Users] trying to access archives - access denied

On 11/27/06, Rachel Assuncao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am the manger for a couple of different lists that are relatively new. It > has come to my attention in the last few days that our members are unable to > access the archives when they click on the archives link > (http://lists.genuinecon

Re: [Mailman-Users] trying to access archives - access denied

Thanks for the quick response Patrick. I didn't install Mailman. Our web host (Blue Genesis) offers Mailman as part of their independent server package. We create the mailing list through their host control panel (Pleask) and then do all of the management of it through the Mailman online mailing

Re: [Mailman-Users] ics / iCalendar attachments?

David Gibbs wrote: > >The full content of pass_mime_types is: > >multipart/mixed >multipart/alternative >multipart/related >text/plain >text/html >text/calendar >application/pdf > > >Here's how the mime attachment was included for the ICS file (I mangled >it a bit to make sure it didn't get parsed)

Re: [Mailman-Users] ics / iCalendar attachments?

Mark Sapiro wrote: > That should do it. What are your other content filtering settings? filter_content = yes filter_mime_types = blank pass_mime_types = "multipart/mixed multipart/alternative multipart/related text/plain text/html text/calendar application/pdf" filter_filename_extensions = "exe

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman has just stopped sending out mail to allmailing lists

I have reinstalled over the top of my installation. Doing a diff -u of the source directory after a make and /usr/local/mailman produced nothing of interest. The make install has a large number of "pointers differ in signedness warnings" I did an 'unshunt' and here are some results Some extracts

Re: [Mailman-Users] ics / iCalendar attachments?

David Gibbs wrote: > >Here's the a full message that has the calendar attachment ... > >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Content-class: urn:content-classes:calendarmessage >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C711C7.683876B5" >X-MimeOLE

Re: [Mailman-Users] ics / iCalendar attachments?

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Since your content filtering options include "collapse_alternatives = > yes", Mailman selects only the first alternative of those that remain > after initial filtering for delivery to the list. Thus the > text/calendar alternative is dropped in favor of the text/plain > alterna

Re: [Mailman-Users] trying to access archives - access denied

Rachel Assuncao wrote: > >I didn't install Mailman. Our web host (Blue Genesis) offers Mailman as >part of their independent server package. We create the mailing list >through their host control panel (Pleask) and then do all of the management >of it through the Mailman online mailing list admin

Re: [Mailman-Users] ics / iCalendar attachments?

David Gibbs wrote: > >Two words: Brick-wall & Head (as in: hitting one against the other ... >I'll accomplish the same whichever I do). > >Although I don't think it's a M$ Exchange problem ... when I sent a >event attachment with GMail, I get the same behavior. If all the MUA's send the text/cale

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

Thank you for all your comments, next time I'll RTFM a bit more :) I'll let you know how it goes, Mathias On 11/25/06, Jack Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As one stat, one of my lists of 10,000 is usually completed within 24 mins. > I usually drop all filter scans during that time, plus I u

Re: [Mailman-Users] ics / iCalendar attachments?

Mark Sapiro wrote: > If all the MUA's send the text/calendar part with a text/plain > alternative, then what you need to do is 2). Yep, figured that. > The potentially unwanted effects I had in mind are that your current > settings accept both text/plain and text/html, but if a text/html > part

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman has just stopped sending out mail toallmailing lists

Dirk Koopman wrote: >The make install has a large number of "pointers differ in signedness >warnings" I think the only things that would produce this are the compilations of the wrappers, and I don't see that wrapper issues could cause the problem you're having. Did you do any kind of Python up

Re: [Mailman-Users] trying to access archives - access denied

Hello Mark, Thanks for the follow up. I checked the link you provided, and yes, I can access the archives that way. So, it is good to know that the archives are OK! I've also been talking with our web host, who tried to help, couldn't, and has now referred me to Pleask's service team for furthe

[Mailman-Users] Change the Webinterface url

Hi, how can I change the url to the webinterface of an already existing list setup? Because I wanted to switch to https, but I don't see the option for an existing setup. Every new list is working fine with the new configuration in the mm_cfg.py but the old once doesn't care about the changes. st

Re: [Mailman-Users] Change the Webinterface url

Stephan Jennewein wrote: > >how can I change the url to the webinterface of an already existing >list setup? Because I wanted to switch to https, but I don't see the >option for an existing setup. Every new list is working fine with the >new configuration in the mm_cfg.py but the old once doesn't c

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

Can you elaborate more? How to seperate the mail queues and drop the filter scans? Mathias Andre wrote: >Thank you for all your comments, next time I'll RTFM a bit more :) > >I'll let you know how it goes, > >Mathias > >On 11/25/06, Jack Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>As one stat, on

Re: [Mailman-Users] I sent out a mailing, how can I know it's done or not?

When I read on the logs/smtp, many of the records said "All recipients refused: (452, '4.4.5 Insufficient disk space; try again later')", but there are actually plenty of the disk space left in the server, why? Mark Sapiro wrote: >Jack Stone wrote: > > > >>I usually look in ~mailman/qfiles/o

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old lists are working. New lists discard allmessages. How to debug?

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Brian Parish wrote: > > >> I have a number of lists running happily, but a couple of new ones don't >> want to play. For testing purposes I subscribe myself to them and a >> couple of other addresses. All message sent to them from subscribed >> addresses get automatically