At 12:15 PM +0800 11/28/06, Stanley Chen wrote:
> Can you elaborate more? How to seperate the mail queues and drop the
> filter scans?
The easiest way is to configure your MTA so that it has a different
and customized configuration that it uses for listening to a
particular numbered port on t
At 12:46 PM +0800 11/28/06, Stanley Chen wrote:
> When I read on the logs/smtp, many of the records said "All recipients
> refused: (452, '4.4.5 Insufficient disk space; try again later')", but
> there are actually plenty of the disk space left in the server, why?
Again, that's likely to be a
Hi,
I setup mailman to manage lists at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The mailinglists works, but the admininterface gives me a headache.
The Webserver is not accessible from the outsite, so I have to use a
SSH-Tunnel like
ssh -L 8080:localhost:80 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Going to, for example,
http://localhost:80
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Dark Servant wrote:
> The mailinglists works, but the admininterface gives me a headache.
>
> The Webserver is not accessible from the outsite, so I have to use a
> SSH-Tunnel like
> ssh -L 8080:localhost:80 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Going to, for example,
> http://localho
On Nov 27, 2006, at 10:57 PM, Brian Parish wrote
>> Brian Parish wrote:
>>
>>> I have a number of lists running happily, but a couple of new
>>> ones don't
>>> want to play. For testing purposes I subscribe myself to them and a
>>> couple of other addresses. All message sent to them from subsc
Dan Phillips wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2006, at 10:57 PM, Brian Parish wrote
>
>>> Brian Parish wrote:
>>>
I have a number of lists running happily, but a couple of new ones
don't
want to play. For testing purposes I subscribe myself to them and a
couple of other addresses. All mess
On 11/28/06, Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there really no way of having mailman indicate a reason for
> discarding a message? It would be really helpful to know what criteria
> are in play here.
In fact, Mailman normally does give a reason in the vette log, except
in a few limited
On 11/28/06, Dark Servant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I setup mailman to manage lists at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The mailinglists works, but the admininterface gives me a headache.
>
> The Webserver is not accessible from the outsite, so I have to use a
> SSH-Tunnel like
> ssh -L 8080:localhost:80 [
On 11/28/06, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Dark Servant wrote:
>
> > The mailinglists works, but the admininterface gives me a headache.
> >
> > The Webserver is not accessible from the outsite, so I have to use a
> > SSH-Tunnel like
> > ssh -L 8080
On 11/28/06, Dark Servant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm.. what exactly does the fix_url script do? Changing the URLs on the
> interface as I want?
It changes the URLs on the pages to match the current config.
> Am I right that setting the DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN to something like "
> http://localhos
I've installed mailman using Yum. I'll create a list which sends out the email
that
the list has been created. When I subcribe using the email it works fine,
however if I
click on the link back to the server I get a 500 Internal Server Error.
I look in my Apache logs and get the following erro
Somehow, a user has gotten himself subscribed to one of my lists with
an address of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED]@hotmail.com. How do I get rid of this
subscription?
The various web interface options just give an error that this address
is not subscribed (even while showing it on the list of subscri
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 3:03 PM +1100 11/27/06, Guy Waugh quoted Kim Hawtin:
>
>>> How/where do you share the incoming mail list aliases that sendmail
>>> checks?
>>>
>>> Also when you create a new list, how to you update the other hosts
>>> aliases?
>>>
>> On each server, in the sendmail ali
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:08 PM, Guy Waugh wrote:
> I'm still wondering whether I should be NFS-sharing the qfiles
> directory. I haven't delved into the Mailman source code to try to
> figure this out, but...
You should be able to NFS share the qfiles d
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:08 PM, Guy Waugh wrote:
>
>> I'm still wondering whether I should be NFS-sharing the qfiles
>> directory. I haven't delved into the Mailman source code to try to
>> figure this out, but...
>
> You should
At 10:08 AM +1100 11/29/06, Guy Waugh wrote:
> I'm still wondering whether I should be NFS-sharing the qfiles
> directory. I haven't delved into the Mailman source code to try to
> figure this out, but...
In theory, it should work. I wouldn't do it myself, because of the
contention and locki
At 6:30 PM -0500 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Of course, if machine 1 went down, all the messages in its hash
> slices would sit unprocessed, but it would be a fairly simple matter
> to reconfigure machine 2 to handle machine 1's slices, or to bring up
> a fallback machine to handle those s
Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 6:30 PM -0500 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > Of course, if machine 1 went down, all the messages in its hash
> > slices would sit unprocessed, but it would be a fairly simple matter
> > to reconfigure machine 2 to
At 6:10 PM -0600 11/28/06, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
Searching the FAQ wizard for "NFS" doesn't turn up any hits, so I
would venture a guess to say that this issue is not addressed
anywhere. I'll summarize Barry's response and put in a link.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL P
At 6:14 PM -0600 11/28/06, Brad Knowles quoted Gadi Evron:
>> Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
>
> Searching the FAQ wizard for "NFS" doesn't turn up any hits, so I
> would venture a guess to say that this issue is not addressed anywhere.
> I'll summarize Barry's response and put in a link.
Okay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:32 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> I believe that you are correct -- if the post is held on only one
> server, and you happen to log into the other server to approve the
> post, then the second machine would not see that post to approv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 6:10 PM -0600 11/28/06, Gadi Evron wrote:
>
>> Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
>
> Searching the FAQ wizard for "NFS" doesn't turn up any hits, so I
> would venture a guess to say that this issue i
22 matches
Mail list logo
