Hi,
I want to use virtual domains on my mailman server. Though the problem
I'm having at the moment is that any email sent out from the second virtual
domain the resulting address matches that of the server itself and not the
individual list (domain).
For example the mailman server's
Frank Cusack wrote:
I looked over the patch and didn't see any umask changes. Maybe
it was another patch that did something. Anyway ... I changed
the MHONARC_ARCHIVER_PATH option to include '-umask 002' and
it works. That's good enough for me.
So it seems that with the patch installed and
Saxvik, Ben wrote:
For example the mailman server's FQDN is listserv.testdomain.com.au and the
new virtual domain that has been added to this server is
listserv.anotherdomain.com.au. So any email sent out from
listserv.anotherdomain.com.au the domain name gets replaced with
I run plenty of lists on my server and on many of them the moderator-requests
are piling up over time.
Mostly when there is a spam-flood or when I'm on vacation or cause the people
that moderate the list dont do their job.
Is there a way to delete the moderator-requests with a command on the
peter pilsl wrote:
Is there a way to delete the moderator-requests with a command on the server
instead of going to the moderator-request-page for each list?
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.012.htp
and
When viewing the archive through the web interface
for an archived HTML message, the HTML MIME
attachment is separated (scrubbed) to a separate
webpage.
A link is provided to view that webpage but the
HTML content, tags and all, has been modified to
display as plain text. This is not very
Hi all,
We're using Mailman 2.1 (in fact, our control.com site was the impetus for
v. 2.1) and appear to have suffered a severe problem in connection with a
system crash over the weekend.
Attempting to access our more important email list via the web interface
results in the following traceback:
I'm running Mailman 2.1.5
I've looked through the archives and have yet to find an answer to this.
I'm running an anonymous discussion list. The list is setup so replies
are by directed back to the list.
I would like to be able to add the senders/posters name (the
(optional) name that is in
Greetings.
I'm a bit new to Mailman, as I've yet to actually install it on anything.
We currently have a majordomo server that's aging, and I'd prefer to
replace it with Mailman for a number of reasons.
Is there any reason I can't run Mailman on our outbound SMTP server, or
would I want to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Mailman 2.1.5
I've looked through the archives and have yet to find an answer to this.
I'm running an anonymous discussion list. The list is setup so replies
are by directed back to the list.
I would like to be able to add the senders/posters name
I have personalization turn on but I didn't think it had a variable
for the poster/senders name (not that I found). Am I missing some
thing? I know it has the TO: username variable. But thats not what I'm
looking for.
Jeff
Quoting Ashley M. Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have personalization turn on but I didn't think it had a variable
for the poster/senders name (not that I found). Am I missing some
thing? I know it has the TO: username variable. But thats not what I'm
looking for.
Log in to your admin site, go under the
Hi, all.
I find that I'm not able to post to a specific Mailman list running
Mailman 2.1B2. If I post from an address at Utoronto.ca, using a rogers.com
SMTP server, everything is fine. If I post from a Gmail address using the
Gmail SMTP server, I get headers in the message body and
Jay Rogers wrote:
How does one change/configure Mailman to get these
archived HTML attachments to display as expected?
Set
ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER = 3
in mm_cfg.py, but first read the comments about this setting in
Defaults.py, and perhaps also google 'xss' and read some of the
relevant hits.
At 4:29 PM -0500 1/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running an anonymous discussion list. The list is setup so replies
are by directed back to the list.
I would like to be able to add the senders/posters name (the
(optional) name that is in the system) to the header, message or footer.
At 1:13 PM -0800 1/8/07, Jay Chandler wrote:
Is there any reason I can't run Mailman on our outbound SMTP server, or
would I want to locate it somewhere else? I'd like to avoid giving it
its own dedicated box if at all possible, but I also don't want it to
complicate the sending of
At 2:19 PM -0500 1/8/07, Jay Rogers wrote:
How does one change/configure Mailman to get these
archived HTML attachments to display as expected?
That sounds like a web server MIME type issue, in that the web server
is not telling the web client the appropriate information regarding
the
Mark Sapiro wrote:
All of the personalization substitutions are for the RECIPIENT, not the
SENDER.
Ah yes, I did overlook that part. My bad.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Ken Crater wrote:
Attempting to access our more important email list via the web interface
results in the following traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /var/mailman/scripts/driver, line 87, in run_main
main()
File /var/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/admin.py, line 70, in main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Normally, if the config.pck is corrupt, we should fall back to the
config.pck.last which should be OK. It is difficult to see how the
logic could result in both files being corrupt, but strange things
Aman Singer wrote:
I find that I'm not able to post to a specific Mailman list running
Mailman 2.1B2.
Over 4 years old. Current release is 2.1.9. Is there some reason why
you can't upgrade?
If I post from an address at Utoronto.ca, using a rogers.com
SMTP server, everything is fine. If
Thanks, Barry and Mark, I'm resigned to my fate.
Just as additional info on the circumstances:
- The system crash seems to have been caused by disk errors on an alleged
RAID array (still working on that problem), so that may account for the file
corruption.
- We were running Mailman 2.1, so the
22 matches
Mail list logo